54144

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Newsgroups: alt.atheism
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ira.uka.de!news.dfn.de!tubsibr!dbstu1.rz.tu-bs.de!I3150101
From: [e-mail] (Benedikt Rosenau)
Subject: Re: Islam And Scientific Predictions (was Re: Genocide is Caused by Atheism)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Mr. Nntp Inews Entry)
Organization: Technical University Braunschweig, Germany
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1993 15:16:32 GMT
Lines: 46

In article <[e-mail]>
[e-mail] (Fred Rice) writes:
 
>>(Deletion)
>>>"(God is) the One Who created the night, the day, the sun and the moon.
>>>Each is travelling in an orbit with its own motion." (Qur'an :33)
>>>
(Deletion)
>>Well, that is certainly different, but it looks as if there is a translation
>>found for everything. By the way, I am most surprised to hear that night and
>>day move in an orbit.
>
>I thought about this, too -- some translations refer to only the latter
>two objects being in orbit, but Bucaille's translation seems to indicate
>the night and the day travelling in "orbit" too.  Perhaps this can be
>understood when one looks at it from the earth's reference frame -- from
>this reference frame, the day and the night would appear to "orbit" the
>earth (travelling from east to west).  (This is from the reference frame
>when the earth is still.)
>
 
Well, yes, but that belongs in the other group, there is a interpretation
found for everything. However, allowing any form of interpretation reduces
the information of the text so interprteted to zero.
 
By the way, I have checked the quote and I think the lines preceding those
quoted above are more interesting:
 
   21:32 where mountains are set on earth in order to immobilize the earth.
   21:33 where the skies (heavens?) are referred to as well supported.
 
the lines given above are  21:34 after my edition.
 
 
>Maybe this is what is meant by the above....?  It's just a possibility.
>
>>And that the sun travels in an orbit without saying that earth does, too,
>>sounds geocentric to me.
>
>I will see if I can find out more about this.
>
>But it is still not geocentric.
>
 
That sun and moon move and the earth is immobile sounds geocentric to me.
   Benedikt