📄 54697
字号:
Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.politics.guns:54697 soc.culture.usa:13871 alt.rush-limbaugh:23782Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!wupost!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet! ftpbox!mothost!motsrd!white!sapphire.rtsg.mot.com!shale!dusekNewsgroups: talk.politics.guns,soc.culture.usa,alt.rush-limbaughSubject: Re: ATF BURNS DIVIDIAN RANCH! NO SURVIVORS!!!Message-ID: <dusek.735489223@shale>From: dusek@rtsg.mot.com (James P. Dusek)Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1993 14:33:43 GMTSender: news@rtsg.mot.comReferences: <93109.13404334AEJ7D@CMUVM.BITNET> <C5stLG.Fwq@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Apr21.113421.5309@dct.ac.uk>Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure GroupNntp-Posting-Host: shaleLines: 10ccdarg@dct.ac.uk (Alan Greig) writes:>or the cultists...) I think I'll quote the BBC quoting (actually voice>interview) one of the two British survivors. He claimed that the fire>started when the tanks caused an internal wooden wall/roof to collapse>knocking over kerosene lamps and that they had no suicide plan. If the FBI started the fire, why didn`t people flee theburning building?James Dusek
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -