54675

神经网络昆斯林的新闻组分类2006

Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.politics.usa.constitution:2042 talk.politics.guns:54675
Nntp-Posting-Host: surt.ifi.uio.no
Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.constitution,talk.politics.guns
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!uunet!mcsun!sunic!ugle.unit.no!trane.uninett.no!nntp.uio.no!ifi.uio.no!thomasp
From: Thomas Parsli <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Rewording the Second Amendment (ideas)
In-Reply-To: [e-mail] (Aaron Ray Clements)'s message of 21 Apr
        1993 12:34:51 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Thomas Parsli)
Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway
References: <1qv87v$[e-mail]>
        <[e-mail]>
        <[e-mail]>
        <[e-mail]>
        <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1993 13:27:30 GMT
Lines: 24
Originator: [e-mail]



Chemical weapons are not concidered a *very* effectiv weapon against
millitary forces. On civillians on the other hand....

That's one GOOD reason for banning it.

You need VAST amounts of chemicals to be affective, so the best reason
to have/use it is price. (that's why it's called The Poor Mans A-bomb)

Any thoughts on Bio-weapons ??	

If this discusion is about civillians having chem-weapons;
What should they use them on?? Rob a bank ??



	This is not a .signature.
	It's merely a computergenerated text to waste bandwith
	and to bring down the evil Internet.


                        Thomas Parsli
                        [e-mail]