⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc2156.txt

📁 著名的RFC文档,其中有一些文档是已经翻译成中文的的.
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 5 页
字号:
Kille                       Standards Track                    [Page 20]RFC 2156                         MIXER                      January 1998   Auto-forwarded Indication      Supported as new RFC 822 header (Auto-Forwarded:).   Basic Physical Rendition      N/A (PDAU).   Blind Copy Recipient Indication      Supported.   Body Part Encryption Indication      Supported by use of a new RFC 822 header (Original-Encoded-      Information-Types:), although in most cases it will not be      possible to map the body part in question.   Content Confidentiality      Not supported.   Content Integrity      Not supported.   Conversion Prohibition      Supported. Operation defined in RFC 2157.   Conversion Prohibition in Case of Loss of Information      Supported.  Operation defined in RFC 2157.   Counter Collection      N/A (PDAU).   Counter Collection with Advice      N/A (PDAU).   Cross Referencing Indication      Supported.   Deferred Delivery      N/A (prior).  This service shall always be provided by the MTS      prior to the gateway.  A new RFC 822 header (Deferred-Delivery:)      is provided to transfer information on this service to the      recipient.   Deferred Delivery Cancellation      N/A (local).   Delivery Notification      Supported.  This is performed at the gateway, but may be performed      at the end system if the end system supports NOTARY.  Thus, a      notification is sent by the gateway to the originator.Kille                       Standards Track                    [Page 21]RFC 2156                         MIXER                      January 1998   Delivery via Bureaufax Service      N/A (PDAU).   Designation of Recipient by Directory Name      N/A (local).   Disclosure of Other Recipients      Supported by use of a new RFC 822 header (X400-Recipients:).  This      is descriptive information for the RFC 822 recipient, and is not      reverse mappable.   DL Expansion History Indication      Supported by use of a new RFC 822 header (DL-Expansion-History:).   DL Expansion Prohibited      Distribution List means MTS supported distribution list, in the      manner of X.400.  This service does not exist in the RFC 822      world, although RFC 822 supports distribution list functionality.      There is no SMTP leve control to prohibit distribution list      expansion.   A MIXER gateway has two conformant options.  The      first is not to gateway a message requesting DL expansion      prohibition, as this control cannot be guaranteed.  This option      supports the service, but may cause unacceptable level of message      rejections. The second is to gateway the message on the basis that      there is no distribution list service in RFC 822. RFC 1327 allowed      only the second option.   If the first option is shown to be      operationally effective, it may be the only option in future      versions of MIXER.   Express Mail Service      N/A (PDAU).   Expiry Date Indication      Supported as new RFC 822 header (Expires:).  In general, no      automatic action can be expected.   Explicit Conversion      N/A (prior).   Forwarded IP Message Indication      Supported.   Grade of Delivery Selection      Not Supported.  There is no equivalent service in RFC 822.   Importance Indication      Supported as new RFC 822 header (Importance:).Kille                       Standards Track                    [Page 22]RFC 2156                         MIXER                      January 1998   Incomplete Copy Indication      Supported as new RFC 822 header (Incomplete-Copy:).   Language Indication      Supported as new RFC 822 header (Content-Language:).   Latest Delivery Designation      Not supported.  A new RFC 822 header (Latest-Delivery-Time:) is      provided, which may be used by the recipient for general      information, but will not be acted on by the SMTP infrastrucuture.   Message Flow Confidentiality      Not supported.   Message Origin Authentication      N/A (reception).   Message Security Labelling      Not supported.   Message Sequence Integrity      Not supported.   Multi-Destination Delivery Supported.   Multi-part Body      Supported.   Non Receipt Notification Request      Not supported.   Non Repudiation of Delivery      Not supported.   Non Repudiation of Origin      N/A (reception).   Non Repudiation of Submission      N/A (local).   Obsoleting Indication      Supported as new RFC 822 header (Supersedes:).   Ordinary Mail      N/A (PDAU).   Originator Indication      Supported.Kille                       Standards Track                    [Page 23]RFC 2156                         MIXER                      January 1998   Originator Requested Alternate Recipient      Not supported, but is placed as comment next to address (X400-      Recipients:).   Physical Delivery Notification by MHS      N/A (PDAU).   Physical Delivery Notification by PDS      N/A (PDAU).   Physical Forwarding Allowed      Supported by use of a comment in a new RFC 822 header (X400-      Recipients:), associated with the recipient in question.   Physical Forwarding Prohibited      Supported by use of a comment in a new RFC 822 header (X400-      Recipients:), associated with the recipient in question.   Prevention of Non-delivery notification      Supported where SMTP and NOTARY are available.  In other cases      formally supported, as delivery notifications cannot be generated      by RFC 822.  In practice, errors will be returned as IP Messages,      and so this service may appear not to be supported (see Non-      delivery Notification).   Primary and Copy Recipients Indication      Supported   Probe      Supported at the gateway (i.e., the gateway services the probe).   Probe Origin Authentication      N/A (reception).   Proof of Delivery      Not supported.   Proof of Submission      N/A (local).   Receipt Notification Request Indication      Not supported.Kille                       Standards Track                    [Page 24]RFC 2156                         MIXER                      January 1998   Redirection Disallowed by Originator      Redirection means MTS supported redirection, in the manner of      X.400.  This service does not exist in the RFC 822 world.  RFC 822      redirection (e.g., aliasing) is regarded as an informal      redirection mechanism, beyond the scope of this control.  Messages      will be sent to RFC 822, irrespective of whether this service is      requested. In practice, control of this service is not supported.   Registered Mail      N/A (PDAU).   Registered Mail to Addressee in Person      N/A (PDAU).   Reply Request Indication      Supported as comment next to address.   Replying IP Message Indication      Supported.   Report Origin Authentication      N/A (reception).   Request for Forwarding Address      N/A (PDAU).   Requested Delivery Method      N/A (local).   The service request is dealt with at submission      time.  Any such request is made available through the gateway by      use of a comment associated with the recipient in question.   Return of Content      Supported where SMTP and NOTARY are used. In principle for other      situations, this is N/A, as non-delivery notifications are not      supported.  In practice, most RFC 822 systems will return part or      all of the content along with the IP Message indicating an error      (see Non-delivery Notification).   Sensitivity Indication      Supported as new RFC 822 header (Sensitivity:).   Special Delivery      N/A (PDAU).   Stored Message Deletion      N/A (MS).Kille                       Standards Track                    [Page 25]RFC 2156                         MIXER                      January 1998   Stored Message Fetching      N/A (MS).   Stored Message Listing      N/A (MS).   Stored Message Summary      N/A (MS).   Subject Indication      Supported.   Undeliverable Mail with Return of Physical Message      N/A (PDAU).   Use of Distribution List      In principle this applies only to X.400 supported distribution      lists (see DL Expansion Prohibited).  Theoretically, this service      is N/A (prior).  In practice, because of informal RFC 822 lists,      this service can be regarded as supported.   Auto-Submitted Indication      Supported2.3.2.  Reception by X.4002.3.2.1.  Standard Mandatory Services   The following standard IPM mandatory user facilities are required for   reception of RFC 822 originated mail by an X.400 UA.   Content Type Indication   Delivery Time Stamp Indication   IP Message Identification   Message Identification   Non-delivery Notification   Original Encoded Information Types Indication   Submission Time Stamp Indication   Typed BodyKille                       Standards Track                    [Page 26]RFC 2156                         MIXER                      January 19982.3.2.2.  Standard Optional Services   The following standard IPM optional user facilities are required for   reception of RFC 822 originated mail by an X.400 UA.   Authorising User's Indication   Blind Copy Recipient Indication   Cross Referencing Indication   Originator Indication   Primary and Copy Recipients Indication   Replying IP Message Indication   Subject Indication2.3.2.3.  New Services   A new X.400 service "RFC 822 Header Field" is defined using the   extension facilities.  This allows for any RFC 822 header field to be   represented.  It may be present in RFC 822 originated messages which   are received by an X.400 UA.Chapter 3 Basic Mappings3.1.  Notation

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -