📄 rfc2283.txt
字号:
exchanges). Moreover, in IBGP exchanges such a message must also carry the LOCAL_PREF attribute. If such a message is received from an external peer, the local system shall check whether the leftmost AS in the AS_PATH attribute is equal to the autonomous system number of the peer than sent the message. If that is not the case, the local system shall send the NOTIFICATION message with Error Code UPDATE Message Error, and the Error Subcode set to Malformed AS_PATH.5. Multiprotocol Unreachable NLRI - MP_UNREACH_NLRI (Type Code 15): This is an optional non-transitive attribute that can be used for the purpose of withdrawing multiple unfeasible routes from service. The attribute contains one or more triples <Address Family Information, Unfeasible Routes Length, Withdrawn Routes>, where each triple is encoded as shown below: +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Address Family Identifier (2 octets) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Subsequent Address Family Identifier (1 octet) | +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Withdrawn Routes (variable) | +---------------------------------------------------------+Bates, et. al. Standards Track [Page 5]RFC 2283 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 February 1998 The use and the meaning of these fields are as follows: Address Family Identifier: This field carries the identity of the Network Layer protocol associated with the NLRI that follows. Presently defined values for this field are specified in RFC1700 (see the Address Family Numbers section). Subsequent Address Family Identifier: This field provides additional information about the type of the Network Layer Reachability Information carried in the attribute. Withdrawn Routes: A variable length field that lists NLRI for the routes that are being withdrawn from service. When the Subsequent Address Family Identifier field is set to one of the values defined in this document, each NLRI is encoded as specified in the "NLRI encoding" section of this document. An UPDATE message that contains the MP_UNREACH_NLRI is not required to carry any other path attributes.6. NLRI encoding The Network Layer Reachability information is encoded as one or more 2-tuples of the form <length, prefix>, whose fields are described below: +---------------------------+ | Length (1 octet) | +---------------------------+ | Prefix (variable) | +---------------------------+ The use and the meaning of these fields are as follows: a) Length: The Length field indicates the length in bits of the address prefix. A length of zero indicates a prefix that matches all (as specified by the address family) addresses (with prefix, itself, of zero octets).Bates, et. al. Standards Track [Page 6]RFC 2283 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 February 1998 b) Prefix: The Prefix field contains address prefixes followed by enough trailing bits to make the end of the field fall on an octet boundary. Note that the value of trailing bits is irrelevant.7. Subsequent Address Family Identifier This document defines the following values for the Subsequent Address Family Identifier field carried in the MP_REACH_NLRI and MP_UNREACH_NLRI attributes: 1 - Network Layer Reachability Information used for unicast forwarding 2 - Network Layer Reachability Information used for multicast forwarding 3 - Network Layer Reachability Information used for both unicast and multicast forwarding This document reserves values 128-255 for vendor-specific applications. This document reserves value 0. Subsequent Address Family Identifiers (other than those reserved for vendor specific use) are assigned only by the IETF consensus process and IESG approval.8. Security Considerations This extension to BGP does not change the underlying security issues.9. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank members of the IDR Working Group for their review and comments.Bates, et. al. Standards Track [Page 7]RFC 2283 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 February 199810. References [BGP-4] Rekhter, Y., and T. Li, "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 1771, March 1995. [IPv4] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791, September 1981. [RFC1700] Reynolds, J., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers," STD 2, RFC 1700, October 1994. (see also http://www.iana.org/iana/assignments.html)11. Author Information Tony Bates Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134 EMail: tbates@cisco.com Ravi Chandra Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134 EMail: rchandra@cisco.com Dave Katz Juniper Networks, Inc. 3260 Jay St. Santa Clara, CA 95054 EMail: dkatz@jnx.com Yakov Rekhter Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134 EMail: yakov@cisco.comBates, et. al. Standards Track [Page 8]RFC 2283 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 February 199812. Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Bates, et. al. Standards Track [Page 9]
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -