rfc1850.txt
来自「RFC 的详细文档!」· 文本 代码 · 共 2,006 行 · 第 1/5 页
TXT
2,006 行
Network Working Group F. Baker
Request For Comments: 1850 Cisco Systems
Obsoletes: 1253 R. Coltun
Category: Standards Track RainbowBridge Communications
November 1995
OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets.
In particular, it defines objects for managing the Open Shortest Path
First Routing Protocol.
Table of Contents
1. The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework .............. 2
1.1 Object Definitions .................................. 3
2. Overview ............................................. 3
2.1 Changes from RFC 1253 ............................... 3
2.2 Textual Conventions ................................. 6
2.3 Structure of MIB .................................... 6
2.3.1 General Variables ................................. 6
2.3.2 Area Data Structure and Area Stub Metric Table .... 7
2.3.3 Link State Database and External Link State
Database .......................................... 7
2.3.4 Address Table and Host Tables ..................... 7
2.3.5 Interface and Interface Metric Tables ............. 7
2.3.6 Virtual Interface Table ........................... 7
2.3.7 Neighbor and Virtual Neighbor Tables .............. 7
2.4 Conceptual Row Creation ............................. 7
2.5 Default Configuration ............................... 8
3. Definitions .......................................... 10
3.1 OSPF General Variables .............................. 13
3.2 OSPF Area Table ..................................... 17
Baker & Coltun Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 1850 OSPF MIB November 1995
3.3 OSPF Area Default Metrics ........................... 21
3.4 OSPF Link State Database ............................ 25
3.5 OSPF Address Range Table ............................ 27
3.6 OSPF Host Table ..................................... 29
3.7 OSPF Interface Table ................................ 32
3.8 OSPF Interface Metrics .............................. 39
3.9 OSPF Virtual Interface Table ........................ 42
3.10 OSPF Neighbor Table ................................ 46
3.11 OSPF Virtual Neighbor Table ........................ 51
3.12 OSPF External Link State Database .................. 54
3.13 OSPF Route Table Use ............................... 57
3.14 OSPF Area Aggregate Table .......................... 58
4. OSPF Traps ........................................... 66
4.1 Format Of Trap Definitions .......................... 67
4.2 Approach ............................................ 67
4.3 Ignoring Initial Activity ........................... 67
4.4 Throttling Traps .................................... 67
4.5 One Trap Per OSPF Event ............................. 68
4.6 Polling Event Counters .............................. 68
5. OSPF Trap Definitions ................................ 69
5.1 Trap Support Objects ................................ 69
5.2 Traps ............................................... 71
6. Acknowledgements ...................................... 78
7. References ............................................ 78
8. Security Considerations ............................... 80
9. Authors' Addresses .................................... 80
1. The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework
The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework consists of four major
components. They are:
o RFC 1441 which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for
describing and naming objects for the purpose of
management.
o STD 17, RFC 1213 defines MIB-II, the core set of managed objects
for the Internet suite of protocols.
o RFC 1445 which defines the administrative and other
architectural aspects of the framework.
o RFC 1448 which defines the protocol used for network
access to managed objects.
The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of
experimentation and evaluation.
Baker & Coltun Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 1850 OSPF MIB November 1995
1.1. Object Definitions
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are
defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1)
defined in the SMI. In particular, each object object type is named
by an OBJECT IDENTIFIER, an administratively assigned name. The
object type together with an object instance serves to uniquely
identify a specific instantiation of the object. For human
convenience, we often use a textual string, termed the descriptor, to
refer to the object type.
2. Overview
2.1. Changes from RFC 1253
The changes from RFC 1253 are the following:
(1) The textual convention PositiveInteger was changed from
1..'FFFFFFFF'h to 1..'7FFFFFFF'h at the request of
Marshall Rose.
(2) The textual convention TOSType was changed to reflect the
TOS values defined in the Router Requirements Draft, and
in accordance with the IP Forwarding Table MIB's values.
(3) The names of some objects were changed, conforming to the
convention that an acronym (for example, LSA) is a single
word ("Lsa") in most SNMP names.
(4) textual changes were made to make the MIB readable by
Dave Perkins' SMIC MIB Compiler in addition to Mosy.
This involved changing the case of some characters in
certain names and removing the DEFVAL clauses for
Counters.
(5) The variables ospfAreaStatus and ospfIfStatus were added,
having been overlooked in the original MIB.
(6) The range of the variable ospfLsdbType was extended to
include multicastLink (Group-membership LSA) and
nssaExternalLink (NSSA LSA).
(7) The variable ospfIfMetricMetric was renamed
ospfIfMetricValue, and the following text was removed
from its description:
"The value FFFF is distinguished to mean 'no route via
Baker & Coltun Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 1850 OSPF MIB November 1995
this TOS'."
(8) The variable ospfNbmaNbrPermanence was added, with the
values 'dynamic' and 'permanent'; by this means,
dynamically learned and configured neighbors can be
distinguished.
(9) The DESCRIPTION of the variable ospfNbrIpAddr was changed
from
"The IP address of this neighbor."
to
"The IP address this neighbor is using in its IP Source
Address. Note that, on addressless links, this will not
be 0.0.0.0, but the address of another of the neighbor's
interfaces."
This is by way of clarification and does not change the
specification.
(10) The OSPF External Link State Database was added. The
OSPF Link State Database used to display all LSAs stored;
in this MIB, it displays all but the AS External LSAs.
This is because there are usually a large number of
External LSAs, and they are relicated in all non-Stub
Areas.
(11) The variable ospfAreaSummary was added to control the
import of summary LSAs into stub areas. If it is
noAreaSummary (default) the router will neither originate
nor propagate summary LSAs into the stub area. It will
rely entirely on its default route. If it is
sendAreaSummary, the router will both summarize and
propagate summary LSAs.
(12) The general variables ospfExtLsdbLimit and
ExitOverflowInterval were introduced to help handle LSDB
overflow.
(13) The use of the IP Forwarding Table is defined.
(14) The ospfAreaRangeTable was obsoleted and replaced with
the ospfAreaAggregateTable to accommodate two additional
indexes. The ospfAreaAggregateEntry keys now include a
LsdbType (which can be used to differentiate between the
traditional type-3 Aggregates and NSSA Aggregates) and an
Baker & Coltun Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 1850 OSPF MIB November 1995
ospfAreaAggregateMask (which will more clearly express
the range).
(15) The variable ospfAreaAggregateEffect was added. This
permits the network manager to hide a subnet within an
area.
(16) Normally, the border router of a stub area advertises a
default route as an OSPF network summary. An NSSA border
router will generate a type-7 LSA indicating a default
route, and import it into the NSSA. ospfStubMetricType
(ospf internal, type 1 external, or type 2 external)
indicates the type of the default metric advertised.
(17) ospfMulticastExtensions is added to the OSPF General
Group. This indicates the router's ability to forward IP
multicast (Class D) datagrams.
(18) ospfIfMulticastForwarding is added to the Interface
Group. It indicates whether, and if so, how, multicasts
should be forwarded on the interface.
(19) The MIB is converted to SNMP Version 2. Beyond simple
text changes and the addition of the MODULE-IDENTITY and
MODULE-COMPLIANCE macros, this involved trading the
TruthValue Textual Convention for SNMP Version 2's, which
has the same values, and trading the Validation Textual
Convention for SNMP Version 2's RowStatus.
(20) ospfAuthType (area authentication type) was changed to an
interface authentication type to match the key. It also
has an additional value, to indicate the use of MD5 for
authentication.
(21) ospfIfIntfType has a new value, pointToMultipoint.
(22) ospfIfDemand (read/write) is added, to permit control of
Demand OSPF features.
(23) ospfNbrHelloSuppressed and ospfVirtNbrHelloSuppressed
were added, (read only). They indicate whether Hellos are
being suppressed to the neighbor.
(24) ospfDemandExtensions was added to indicate whether the
Demand OSPF extensions have been implemented, and to
disable them if appropriate.
Baker & Coltun Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 1850 OSPF MIB November 1995
2.2. Textual Conventions
Several new data types are introduced as a textual convention in this
MIB document. These textual conventions enhance the readability of
the specification and can ease comparison with other specifications
if appropriate. It should be noted that the introduction of the
these textual conventions has no effect on either the syntax nor the
semantics of any managed objects. The use of these is merely an
artifact of the explanatory method used. Objects defined in terms of
one of these methods are always encoded by means of the rules that
define the primitive type. Hence, no changes to the SMI or the SNMP
are necessary to accommodate these textual conventions which are
adopted merely for the convenience of readers and writers in pursuit
of the elusive goal of clear, concise, and unambiguous MIB documents.
The new data types are AreaID, RouterID, TOSType, Metric, BigMetric,
Status, PositiveInteger, HelloRange, UpToMaxAge, InterfaceIndex, and
DesignatedRouterPriority.
2.3. Structure of MIB
The MIB is composed of the following sections:
General Variables
Area Data Structure
Area Stub Metric Table
Link State Database
Address Range Table
Host Table
Interface Table
Interface Metric Table
Virtual Interface Table
Neighbor Table
Virtual Neighbor Table
External Link State Database
Aggregate Range Table
There exists a separate MIB for notifications ("traps"), which is
entirely optional.
2.3.1. General Variables
The General Variables are about what they sound like; variables which
are global to the OSPF Process.
Baker & Coltun Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 1850 OSPF MIB November 1995
2.3.2. Area Data Structure and Area Stub Metric Table
The Area Data Structure describes the OSPF Areas that the router
participates in. The Area Stub Metric Table describes the metrics
advertised into a stub area by the default router(s).
2.3.3. Link State Database and External Link State Database
The Link State Database is provided primarily to provide detailed
information for network debugging.
2.3.4. Address Table and Host Tables
The Address Range Table and Host Table are provided to view
configured Network Summary and Host Route information.
2.3.5. Interface and Interface Metric Tables
The Interface Table and the Interface Metric Table together describe
the various IP interfaces to OSPF. The metrics are placed in
separate tables in order to simplify dealing with multiple types of
service, and to provide flexibility in the event that the IP TOS
definition is changed in the future. A Default Value specification
is supplied for the TOS 0 (default) metric.
2.3.6. Virtual Interface Table
Likewise, the Virtual Interface Table describe virtual links to the
OSPF Process.
2.3.7. Neighbor and Virtual Neighbor Tables
The Neighbor Table and the Virtual Neighbor Table describe the
neighbors to the OSPF Process.
2.4. Conceptual Row Creation
For the benefit of row-creation in "conceptual" (see [9]) tables,
DEFVAL (Default Value) clauses are included in the definitions in
section 3, suggesting values which an agent should use for instances
of variables which need to be created due to a Set-Request, but which
are not specified in the Set-Request. DEFVAL clauses have not been
specified for some objects which are read-only, implying that they
are zeroed upon row creation. These objects are of the SYNTAX
Counter32 or Gauge32.
For those objects not having a DEFVAL clause, both management
stations and agents should heed the Robustness Principle of the
Baker & Coltun Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 1850 OSPF MIB November 1995
Internet (see RFC-791):
"be liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you
send"
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?