代码搜索结果

// g++ 1.36.1 bug 900220_02 // g++ treats plain `char' and `unsigned char' as different types, however // it fails to treat `signed char' as being a different type from plain // `char' as called for

// g++ 1.37.1 bug 900520_05 // The following legal code gets syntax errors from g++. // keywords: syntax, unimplemented, operator new, initialization, pointer types struct struct_0 { }; char *cp;

// g++ 1.37.1 bug 900428_01 // g++ fails to issue error messages for cases where an incomplete type // object must be evaluated if the value of such an evaluation is not // actually used in the given

// g++ 1.36.1 bug 900210_05 // Section 18.3 of the 2.0 Reference Manual says "An implementation // providing { anachronistic features } should also provide a way for // the user to ensure that they d

// g++ bug 900406_02 // g++ fails to correctly parse some type specifications within casts. // This results in incorrect errors being issued. // These errors are not issued for identical code by ei

// g++ 1.37.1 bug 900404_04 // [dcl.dcl] explains that simple-declarations may omit the // init-declarator-list only if the decl-specifier-seq declares a // class, i.e. if it contains a class-specifi

// g++ 1.37.1 bug 900321_01 // cfront flags ERRORs on each of the lines indicated below. g++ does not // flag either ERRORs or warnings. // Although I cannot find where in the current C++ Reference

// g++ 1.37.1 bug 900330_02 // The C++ Reference Manual says in section 13.1: // "Two function declarations of the same name refer to the same function // if they are in the same scope and have iden

// g++ should not complain about anonymous bitfields. // Build don't link: struct A { int : 2; };

// g++ ought to warn about casting a base pointer to a derived reference. // Build don't link: struct A { virtual void f () = 0; }; struct B: public A { void f () { } }; int main() { B* bp; A