代码搜索:patch

找到约 9,523 项符合「patch」的源代码

代码结果 9,523
www.eeworm.com/read/382594/2633739

readme

James - I found a couple of problems in my original patch, but I believe this one works. In order to use it: 1) Open a Cygwin console and: Unpack the sources: [bash-2.02]$ cd $ACE_
www.eeworm.com/read/372367/2774663

patchfreq solaris.xtra.patchfreq

#!/bin/ksh # # File: patchfreq # Author: Bryan Cantrill (bmc@eng.sun.com), Solaris Performance # Modified: Sat Apr 26 04:00:59 PDT 1997 # # This is a little script to patch a 5.5 or
www.eeworm.com/read/367730/2831975

entries

/README.txt/1.2/Sat Feb 23 14:26:46 2008// /sdcc-2.6.0-asz80-symlen.patch/1.1.1.1/Fri Feb 15 22:10:30 2008// D
www.eeworm.com/read/367730/2832131

entries

/README.txt/1.6/Thu Feb 7 14:41:11 2008// /sdcc-2.6.0-asz80-symlen.patch/1.1/Sun Dec 30 23:34:19 2007// D
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2873198

f90 where20.f90

! Test the dependency checking in simple where. This ! did not work and was fixed as part of the patch for ! pr24519. ! program where_20 integer :: a(4) integer :: b(3) integer :: c(3) int
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2876189

f90 parens_4.f90

! { dg-do compile } ! Fallout from the patch for PR 14771 ! Testcase by Erik Zeek program test call bob(5) contains subroutine bob(n) integer, intent(in) :: n character(len=n)
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2876890

f90 associated_target_1.f90

! { dg-do compile } ! This tests the patch for PR27584, where an ICE would ensue if ! a bad argument was fed for the target in ASSOCIATED. ! ! Contributed by Tobias Burnus
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2877013

f90 nested_modules_6.f90

! { dg-do compile } ! Test the patch for PR30084 in which the reference to SIZE ! in function diag caused a segfault in module.c. ! ! Contributed by Troban Trumsko ! and reduced by
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2877043

f90 error_recovery_4.f90

! { dg-do compile } ! PR33609 ICE on arithmetic overflow ! Before patch, this segfaulted. print *, real(huge(1.0_8),4) ! { dg-error "Arithmetic overflow" } end
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2877221

f90 alloc_alloc_expr_2.f90

! { dg-do compile } ! This tests the fix for PR29343, in which the valid ALLOCATE statement ! below triggered an error following the patch for PR20779 and PR20891. ! ! Contributed by Grigory Zagorodne