代码搜索：implicit
找到约 5,250 项符合「implicit」的源代码
代码结果 5,250
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2876988
f90 implicit_11.f90
! { dg-do compile }
!
! PR fortran/34760
! The problem with implict typing is that it is unclear
! whether an existing symbol is a variable or a function.
! Thus it remains long FL_UNKNOWN, which cau
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2877125
f90 implicit_8.f90
! { dg-do compile }
! PR 24748
! The compiler used to crash trying to take a substring of an implicit
! real scalar.
subroutine variant1
ybtable=ylocal(1:2) ! { dg-error "Syntax error in argument
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2877376
f90 implicit_5.f90
! PR fortran/21729
! { dg-do compile }
function f1 () ! { dg-error "has no IMPLICIT type" "f1" }
implicit none
end function f1
function f2 () result (r2) ! { dg-error "has no IMPLICIT type" "r2"
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2877394
f90 implicit_3.f90
! { dg-do compile }
! Verify that INTERFACEs don't inherit the implicit types of the
! surrounding namespace.
implicit complex (i-k)
interface
function f(k,l)
! k should be default INTEGER
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2877399
f90 implicit_6.f90
! { dg-do compile }
! PR 24643
! substring references on implicitly typed CHARACTER variables didn't work
PROGRAM P
IMPLICIT CHARACTER*8 (Y)
YLOCAL='A'
YBTABLE=YLOCAL(1
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2877418
f90 implicit_4.f90
! { dg-do compile }
! Verify error diagnosis for invalid combinations of IMPLICIT statements
IMPLICIT NONE
IMPLICIT NONE ! { dg-error "Duplicate" }
END
SUBROUTINE a
IMPLICIT REAL(b-j) ! { dg-error "c
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2877514
f90 implicit_10.f90
! { dg-do run }
! Check fix for PR24783 where we did try to resolve the implicit type
! from the wrong namespace thus rejecting valid code.
MODULE mod1
IMPLICIT NONE
CONTAINS
S
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2877540
f90 implicit_actual.f90
! { dg-do compile }
! Tests patch for problem that was found whilst investigating
! PR24158. The call to foo would cause an ICE because the
! actual argument was of a type that was not defined. The U
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2877590
f90 implicit_2.f90
! { dg-do compile }
module implicit_2
! This should cause an error if function types are resolved from the
! module namespace.
implicit none
type t
integer i
end type
contains
! This ca
www.eeworm.com/read/366702/2877721
f90 implicit_1.f90
! { dg-do compile }
! PR 13575 -- we used to not see that c0 has no type, and then ICE later
module AHFinder_dat
implicit none
save c0 ! { dg-error "no IMPLICIT type" "no IMPLICIT type" }
end module