📄 rule_parser.hpp
字号:
/*==============================================================================
Copyright (c) 2006 Tobias Schwinger
http://spirit.sourceforge.net/
Use, modification and distribution is subject to the Boost Software
License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at
http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
==============================================================================*/
// The comment below contains a unnamed 'namespace {', which is flagged by the
// Boost inspect tool as a violation of common C++ programming rules. Since it's
// in a comment, well, we switch it off :-P
// boostinspect:nounnamed
//
// About:
// =====
//
// Using a typeof operator or Boost.Typeof to automatically set the type of
// variables (as done in the Spirit example demonstrating typeof) is by far not
// all we can do to tighten up our grammars as there are some significant
// drawbacks of this approach:
// - the types complexity scales with the complexity of the grammar (sooner or
// later hitting the limits of the compiler),
// - recursive grammars are not possible, and
// - all parser objects are embedded by value.
//
// The Spirit documentation therefore recommends creating custom parser classes
// (derived from the a sub_grammar template):
//
// http://www.boost.org/libs/spirit/doc/techniques.html#no_rules
// http://www.boost.org/libs/spirit/doc/techniques.html#typeof
//
// In practice manually applying this technique leads to rather lengthy code and
// overthis requires the user to have a solid understanding of Spirit details.
//
// Here is a generalized, macro-based approach to easily create typeof-based
// grammars that can be recursive and arbitrarily complex.
//
//
// Quick manual:
// ============
//
// 1. Setup
//
// Before the rule parser macro (the protagonist of the facility) can be used
// the the user must define the macro BOOST_SPIRIT__NAMESPACE (note the double
// underscore characeter) and setup a registration group for Boost.Typeof.
//
// Examples:
//
// // should come after regular #includeS
// #include BOOST_TYPEOF_INCREMENT_REGISTRATION_GROUP()
//
// // [...]
//
// #define BOOST_SPIRIT__NAMESPACE (2,(my_project, my_module))
// // | | +- outer +- inner
// // ! space ! -+ | namespace namespace
// // |
// // +--- number of nested namespaces
//
// namespace my_project { namespace my_module {
//
// // [...]
//
// ---
//
// // should come after regular #includeS
// #include BOOST_TYPEOF_INCREMENT_REGISTRATION_GROUP()
//
// // [...]
//
// #define BOOST_SPIRIT__NAMESPACE (2,(my_project, (anonymous) ))
//
// namespace my_project { namespace {
//
// // [...]
//
// ---
//
// // should come after regular #includeS
// #include BOOST_TYPEOF_INCREMENT_REGISTRATION_GROUP()
//
// // [...]
//
//
// #define BOOST_SPIRIT__NAMESPACE -
// // we're working at root namespace
//
//
// Why do I have to do this?
//
// Boost.Typeof needs to assign a unique ID for each registration. This ID is
// created composed of the line number and the registration group. The
// facility performs Typeof registration and thus requires the source file to
// have its own registration group. Further Boost.Typeof requires registration
// to happen at root namespace so we have to close and reopen the namespace
// we're in.
//
//
// 2. The rule parser macro
//
// A simple rule parser definition looks like that:
//
// // we're at namespace scope here
//
// // Skip parser for C/C++ comments and whitespace
// BOOST_SPIRIT_RULE_PARSER(skipper,
// -,-,-,
//
// +( confix_p("//",*anychar_p,eol_p)
// | confix_p("/*",*anychar_p,"*/")
// | space_p
// )
// )
//
// Now we can use 'skipper' in other Spirit expressions.
//
// The code above creates a parser (template) class 'skpper_t' and (in this
// case, because there are no parameters) a static const instance 'skipper' of
// that class. The class is automatically registered with Boost.Typeof. The type
// name our parser is skipper_t here.
//
//
// 2.1. Parametrized rule parsers
//
// Rule parser definitions can have parameters.
//
// Parameters are passed to the BOOST_SPIRIT_RULE_PARSER macro as its second
// argument (just pass '-' if there are no parameters) with the following
// format:
//
// (N,( param1,param2, / ... / paramN ))
// +-- number of parameters
//
// Example of a whole rule parser:
//
// BOOST_SPIRIT_RULE_PARSER(new_name,
// (1,( symbol_table )),-,-,
//
// lexeme_d[ (alpha_p >> *alnum_p)[ symbol_table.add ] ]
// )
//
// The expression 'new_name(my_symbols)' parses a string literal and adds it to
// the symbol table 'my_symbols'.
//
// The rule parser macro creates a function template as called 'new_name' that
// takes one parameter of deduced reference type and returns a specialization of
// 'new_name_t' in this case.
//
// Since parsers that require to be fast and lightweight often also require to
// be reentrant, it's quite common to pass in some semantic controller (the
// symbol table in the example above).
// However, parameters are templated so they can be anything (including parsers
// of course) so refactoring tasks can be abstracted with rule parsers as well.
//
// BOOST_SPIRIT_RULE_PARSER(enumeration_parser,
// (2,( element_parser, delimiter_parser )),-,-,
//
// element_parser >> *(delimiter_parser >> element_parser)
// )
//
// The expression 'enumeration_parser(int_p[ some_action ], ',')' creates a
// parser for a comma-separated list of integers.
//
//
// 2.2. Rule parsrs and semantic actions
//
// While semantic actions can be globally attached to a rule parser or passed
// to a parametrized rule parser as (part of) an argument, even more control is
// possible by using action placeholders. E.g:
//
// BOOST_SPIRIT_ACTION_PLACEHOLDER(int_action)
//
// BOOST_SPIRIT_RULE_PARSER(int_list,
// -,(1,( int_action )),-,
//
// int_p[ int_action ] >> *(',' >> int_p[ int_action ])
// )
//
// The expression 'int_list[ my_action ]' parses a comma separated list of
// integers and calls 'my_action' for every integer parsed therein.
//
// Of course multiple actions can be attached to one placeholder as usual (in
// this case 'int_list[ my_action1 ][ my_action2 ] would call two actions).
//
// Further there can be multiple action placeholders for a single rule parser:
//
// BOOST_SPIRIT_ACTION_PLACEHOLDER(feed_int)
// BOOST_SPIRIT_ACTION_PLACEHOLDER(next_int)
//
// BOOST_SPIRIT_RULE_PARSER(int_list,
// -,(2,( feed_int, next_int )),-,
//
// int_p[ feed_int ] >> *(',' >> int_p[ next_int ][ feed_int ])
// )
//
// The expression 'int_list[ (feed_int = my_action1), (next_int = my_action2) ]'
// creates a parser for a comma separated list of integers with the actions
// attached appropriately.
//
// int_list[ feed_int = my_action1,my_action2, next_int = my_action3 ]
//
// works too (in this case the action placeholder 'feed_int' has two actions
// attached to it).
//
// You can both override and append actions associated with an action
// placeholder:
//
// var = int_list[ feed_int = my_action1, next_int = my_action2 ]
//
// // [...]
//
// ... var[ feed_int = another_action ]
// // 'another_action' overrides the actions previously attached to 'feed_int'
//
// ... var[ next_int += another_action ]
// // 'another_action' is appended to the list of actions attached to
// // 'next_int'
//
// Action placeholders are not entirely for free -- they add to the size and the
// initialization time of the rule parser. However, the impact on an already
// initialized rule parser instance should be quite small.
//
//
// 2.3. Member variables
//
// You can add member variables to the rule parser class using the third
// parameter of the rule parser macro:
//
// BOOST_SPIRIT_RULE_PARSER( calc,
// -,
// -,
// (3,( ((subrule<0>),expression,()),
// ((subrule<1>),term,()),
// ((subrule<2>),factor,() )) ),
//
// // [...]
//
// adds three subrules to the rule parser.
// Each parameter must have the following type to allow commas to be handled
// safely from within the preprocessing code:
//
// ((type)),name,(constructor argument(s)))
//
//
// 2.4. The opaque rule parser
//
// Rule parsers usually are templates. Building large grammars pushes the
// compiler really hard (and eventually to its limits) because of the
// metafunction complexity involved.
// If a rule parser without parameters and action placeholders is defined, a
// non-template class is created. Non-templated rule parsers can also be created
// explicitly by using BOOST_SPIRIT_OPAQUE_RULE_PARSER.
// Opaque rule parsers can have parameters and member variables (note: no action
// placeholders are possible). The parameters of an opaque rule parsers are
// strictly typed, e.g:
//
// BOOST_SPIRIT_OPAQUE_RULE_PARSER(new_identifier,
// (1,( ((my_symbol_table_t &),symbol_table) ))
// ,-,
// (alpha_p >> *alnum_p) [ symbol_table.add ]
// )
//
// Note it's also possible to have opaque rule parsers accept parameters of
// non-const reference types which is not possible with regular rule parsers.
//
//
// 3. Utilities for by-reference embedding
//
// When using parsers mutiple times or recursively it can be helpful to embed
// them by-reference into the final parser expression.
// For this purpose the library provides a wrapper template 'parser_reference'.
// There is also a function template to create a wrapped parser which can deduce
// the parser's type from its argument.
//
// --- --- - - --- - - --- - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#if !defined(BOOST_SPIRIT_UTILITY_RULE_PARSER_HPP_INCLUDED)
# define BOOST_SPIRIT_UTILITY_RULE_PARSER_HPP_INCLUDED
//==============================================================================
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -