📄 malloc.h
字号:
Automatic trimming is mainly useful in long-lived programs. Because trimming via sbrk can be slow on some systems, and can sometimes be wasteful (in cases where programs immediately afterward allocate more large chunks) the value should be high enough so that your overall system performance would improve by releasing. The trim threshold and the mmap control parameters (see below) can be traded off with one another. Trimming and mmapping are two different ways of releasing unused memory back to the system. Between these two, it is often possible to keep system-level demands of a long-lived program down to a bare minimum. For example, in one test suite of sessions measuring the XF86 X server on Linux, using a trim threshold of 128K and a mmap threshold of 192K led to near-minimal long term resource consumption. If you are using this malloc in a long-lived program, it should pay to experiment with these values. As a rough guide, you might set to a value close to the average size of a process (program) running on your system. Releasing this much memory would allow such a process to run in memory. Generally, it's worth it to tune for trimming rather tham memory mapping when a program undergoes phases where several large chunks are allocated and released in ways that can reuse each other's storage, perhaps mixed with phases where there are no such chunks at all. And in well-behaved long-lived programs, controlling release of large blocks via trimming versus mapping is usually faster. However, in most programs, these parameters serve mainly as protection against the system-level effects of carrying around massive amounts of unneeded memory. Since frequent calls to sbrk, mmap, and munmap otherwise degrade performance, the default parameters are set to relatively high values that serve only as safeguards. The default trim value is high enough to cause trimming only in fairly extreme (by current memory consumption standards) cases. It must be greater than page size to have any useful effect. To disable trimming completely, you can set to (unsigned long)(-1);*/#ifndef DEFAULT_TOP_PAD#define DEFAULT_TOP_PAD (0)#endif/* M_TOP_PAD is the amount of extra `padding' space to allocate or retain whenever sbrk is called. It is used in two ways internally: * When sbrk is called to extend the top of the arena to satisfy a new malloc request, this much padding is added to the sbrk request. * When malloc_trim is called automatically from free(), it is used as the `pad' argument. In both cases, the actual amount of padding is rounded so that the end of the arena is always a system page boundary. The main reason for using padding is to avoid calling sbrk so often. Having even a small pad greatly reduces the likelihood that nearly every malloc request during program start-up (or after trimming) will invoke sbrk, which needlessly wastes time. Automatic rounding-up to page-size units is normally sufficient to avoid measurable overhead, so the default is 0. However, in systems where sbrk is relatively slow, it can pay to increase this value, at the expense of carrying around more memory than the program needs.*/#ifndef DEFAULT_MMAP_THRESHOLD#define DEFAULT_MMAP_THRESHOLD (128 * 1024)#endif/* M_MMAP_THRESHOLD is the request size threshold for using mmap() to service a request. Requests of at least this size that cannot be allocated using already-existing space will be serviced via mmap. (If enough normal freed space already exists it is used instead.) Using mmap segregates relatively large chunks of memory so that they can be individually obtained and released from the host system. A request serviced through mmap is never reused by any other request (at least not directly; the system may just so happen to remap successive requests to the same locations). Segregating space in this way has the benefit that mmapped space can ALWAYS be individually released back to the system, which helps keep the system level memory demands of a long-lived program low. Mapped memory can never become `locked' between other chunks, as can happen with normally allocated chunks, which menas that even trimming via malloc_trim would not release them. However, it has the disadvantages that: 1. The space cannot be reclaimed, consolidated, and then used to service later requests, as happens with normal chunks. 2. It can lead to more wastage because of mmap page alignment requirements 3. It causes malloc performance to be more dependent on host system memory management support routines which may vary in implementation quality and may impose arbitrary limitations. Generally, servicing a request via normal malloc steps is faster than going through a system's mmap. All together, these considerations should lead you to use mmap only for relatively large requests.*/#ifndef DEFAULT_MMAP_MAX#if HAVE_MMAP#define DEFAULT_MMAP_MAX (64)#else#define DEFAULT_MMAP_MAX (0)#endif#endif/* M_MMAP_MAX is the maximum number of requests to simultaneously service using mmap. This parameter exists because: 1. Some systems have a limited number of internal tables for use by mmap. 2. In most systems, overreliance on mmap can degrade overall performance. 3. If a program allocates many large regions, it is probably better off using normal sbrk-based allocation routines that can reclaim and reallocate normal heap memory. Using a small value allows transition into this mode after the first few allocations. Setting to 0 disables all use of mmap. If HAVE_MMAP is not set, the default value is 0, and attempts to set it to non-zero values in mallopt will fail.*//* USE_DL_PREFIX will prefix all public routines with the string 'dl'. Useful to quickly avoid procedure declaration conflicts and linker symbol conflicts with existing memory allocation routines.*//* #define USE_DL_PREFIX *//* Special defines for linux libc Except when compiled using these special defines for Linux libc using weak aliases, this malloc is NOT designed to work in multithreaded applications. No semaphores or other concurrency control are provided to ensure that multiple malloc or free calls don't run at the same time, which could be disasterous. A single semaphore could be used across malloc, realloc, and free (which is essentially the effect of the linux weak alias approach). It would be hard to obtain finer granularity.*/#ifdef INTERNAL_LINUX_C_LIB#if __STD_CVoid_t * __default_morecore_init (ptrdiff_t);Void_t *(*__morecore)(ptrdiff_t) = __default_morecore_init;#elseVoid_t * __default_morecore_init ();Void_t *(*__morecore)() = __default_morecore_init;#endif#define MORECORE (*__morecore)#define MORECORE_FAILURE 0#define MORECORE_CLEARS 1#else /* INTERNAL_LINUX_C_LIB */#if __STD_Cextern Void_t* sbrk(ptrdiff_t);#elseextern Void_t* sbrk();#endif#ifndef MORECORE#define MORECORE sbrk#endif#ifndef MORECORE_FAILURE#define MORECORE_FAILURE -1#endif#ifndef MORECORE_CLEARS#define MORECORE_CLEARS 1#endif#endif /* INTERNAL_LINUX_C_LIB */#if defined(INTERNAL_LINUX_C_LIB) && defined(__ELF__)#define cALLOc __libc_calloc#define fREe __libc_free#define mALLOc __libc_malloc#define mEMALIGn __libc_memalign#define rEALLOc __libc_realloc#define vALLOc __libc_valloc#define pvALLOc __libc_pvalloc#define mALLINFo __libc_mallinfo#define mALLOPt __libc_mallopt#pragma weak calloc = __libc_calloc#pragma weak free = __libc_free#pragma weak cfree = __libc_free#pragma weak malloc = __libc_malloc#pragma weak memalign = __libc_memalign#pragma weak realloc = __libc_realloc#pragma weak valloc = __libc_valloc#pragma weak pvalloc = __libc_pvalloc#pragma weak mallinfo = __libc_mallinfo#pragma weak mallopt = __libc_mallopt#else#ifdef USE_DL_PREFIX#define cALLOc dlcalloc#define fREe dlfree#define mALLOc dlmalloc#define mEMALIGn dlmemalign#define rEALLOc dlrealloc#define vALLOc dlvalloc#define pvALLOc dlpvalloc#define mALLINFo dlmallinfo#define mALLOPt dlmallopt#else /* USE_DL_PREFIX */#define cALLOc calloc#define fREe free#define mALLOc malloc#define mEMALIGn memalign#define rEALLOc realloc#define vALLOc valloc#define pvALLOc pvalloc#define mALLINFo mallinfo#define mALLOPt mallopt#endif /* USE_DL_PREFIX */#endif/* Public routines */#if __STD_CVoid_t* mALLOc(size_t);void fREe(Void_t*);Void_t* rEALLOc(Void_t*, size_t);Void_t* mEMALIGn(size_t, size_t);Void_t* vALLOc(size_t);Void_t* pvALLOc(size_t);Void_t* cALLOc(size_t, size_t);void cfree(Void_t*);int malloc_trim(size_t);size_t malloc_usable_size(Void_t*);void malloc_stats(void);int mALLOPt(int, int);struct mallinfo mALLINFo(void);#elseVoid_t* mALLOc();void fREe();Void_t* rEALLOc();Void_t* mEMALIGn();Void_t* vALLOc();Void_t* pvALLOc();Void_t* cALLOc();void cfree();int malloc_trim();size_t malloc_usable_size();void malloc_stats();int mALLOPt();struct mallinfo mALLINFo();#endif#ifdef __cplusplus}; /* end of extern "C" */#endif
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -