dispatchservlettest.java

是离开的肌肤了卡机是离开的就富利卡及是了的开发及拉考试及的福利科技阿斯利康的肌肤莱卡及时的离开福建阿斯顿发

// ========================================================================
// Copyright 2009 Webtide LLC
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at 
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
// ========================================================================
package com.acme;

import junit.framework.TestCase;

import org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.DefaultServlet;
import org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder;
import org.mortbay.jetty.testing.ServletTester;

/**
 * Simple tests against DispatchServlet.
 */
public class DispatchServletTest extends TestCase
{
    /**
     * As filed in JETTY-978.
     * 
     * Security problems in demo dispatch servlet.
     * 
     * <blockquote>
     * <p>
     * The dispatcher servlet (com.acme.DispatchServlet) is prone to a Denial of
     * Service vulnerability.
     * </p>
     * <p>
     * This example servlet is meant to be used as a resources dispatcher,
     * however a malicious aggressor may abuse this functionality in order to
     * cause a recursive inclusion. In details, it is possible to abuse the
     * method com.acme.DispatchServlet.doGet(DispatchServlet.java:203) forcing
     * the application to recursively include the "Dispatch" servlet.
     * </p>
     * <p>
     * Dispatch com.acme.DispatchServlet 1 Dispatch /dispatch/* As a result, it
     * is possible to trigger a "java.lang.StackOverflowError" and consequently
     * an internal server error (500).
     * </p>
     * <p>
     * Multiple requests may easily affect the availability of the servlet
     * container. Since this attack can cause the server to consume resources in
     * a non-linear relationship to the size of inputs, it should be considered
     * as a server flaw.
     * </p>
     * <p>
     * The vulnerability seems confined to the example servlet and it does not
     * afflict the Jetty's core."
     * </p>
     * </blockquote>
     * 
     * @throws Exception
     */
    public void testSelfRefForwardDenialOfService() throws Exception
    {
        ServletTester tester = new ServletTester();
        tester.setContextPath("/tests");
      
        ServletHolder dispatch = tester.addServlet(DispatchServlet.class,"/dispatch/*");
        tester.addServlet(DefaultServlet.class,"/");
        tester.start();
        
        StringBuffer req1 = new StringBuffer();
        req1.append("GET /tests/dispatch/includeN/"+dispatch.getName()+" HTTP/1.1\n");
        req1.append("Host: tester\n");
        req1.append("Connection: close\n");
        req1.append("\n");

        String response = tester.getResponses(req1.toString());
        
        String msg = "Response code on SelfRefDoS";

        assertFalse(msg + " should not be code 500.",response.startsWith("HTTP/1.1 500 "));
        assertTrue(msg + " should return error code 403 (Forbidden)", response.startsWith("HTTP/1.1 403 "));
    }
    
    public void testSelfRefDeep() throws Exception
    {
        ServletTester tester = new ServletTester();
        tester.setContextPath("/tests");
        tester.addServlet(DispatchServlet.class,"/dispatch/*");
        tester.addServlet(DefaultServlet.class,"/");
        tester.start();
        
        String selfRefs[] =
        { "/dispatch/forward", "/dispatch/includeS", "/dispatch/includeW", "/dispatch/includeN", };

        /*
         * Number of nested dispatch requests. 220 is a good value, as it won't
         * trigger an Error 413 response (Entity too large). Anything larger
         * than 220 will trigger a 413 response.
         */
        int nestedDepth = 220;

        for (int sri = 0; sri < selfRefs.length; sri++)
        {
            String selfRef = selfRefs[sri];

            StringBuffer req1 = new StringBuffer();
            req1.append("GET /tests");
            for (int i = 0; i < nestedDepth; i++)
            {
                req1.append(selfRef);
            }

            req1.append("/ HTTP/1.1\n");
            req1.append("Host: tester\n");
            req1.append("Connection: close\n");
            req1.append("\n");

            String response = tester.getResponses(req1.toString());

            StringBuffer msg = new StringBuffer();
            msg.append("Response code on nested \"").append(selfRef).append("\"");
            msg.append(" (depth:").append(nestedDepth).append(")");

            assertFalse(msg + " should not be code 413 (Request Entity Too Large)," + 
                    "the nestedDepth in the TestCase is too large (reduce it)",
                    response.startsWith("HTTP/1.1 413 "));

            assertFalse(msg + " should not be code 500.",response.startsWith("HTTP/1.1 500 "));
            
            assertTrue(msg + " should return error code 403 (Forbidden)", response.startsWith("HTTP/1.1 403 "));
        }
    }
}