train

pocket_crf_0.45

said	VBD	NNP NNP VBD PRP VBP	O
they	PRP	NNP VBD PRP VBP PRP$	B
expect	VBP	VBD PRP VBP PRP$ JJ	O
their	PRP$	PRP VBP PRP$ JJ ,	B
freight-transport	JJ	VBP PRP$ JJ , NN	I
,	,	PRP$ JJ , NN CC	I
storage	NN	JJ , NN CC NN	I
and	CC	, NN CC NN NNS	I
distribution	NN	NN CC NN NNS TO	I
costs	NNS	CC NN NNS TO VB	I
to	TO	NN NNS TO VB IN	O
rise	VB	NNS TO VB IN CD	O
about	IN	TO VB IN CD NN	B
4	CD	VB IN CD NN DT	I
%	NN	IN CD NN DT NN	I
this	DT	CD NN DT NN .	B
year	NN	NN DT NN .	I
.	.	DT NN .	O

Only	RB	RB CD NN	B
10	CD	RB CD NN IN	I
%	NN	RB CD NN IN DT	I
of	IN	CD NN IN DT CD	O
the	DT	NN IN DT CD NNS	B
250	CD	IN DT CD NNS VBN	I
shippers	NNS	DT CD NNS VBN VBN	I
polled	VBN	CD NNS VBN VBN PRP$	O
expected	VBN	NNS VBN VBN PRP$ JJ	O
their	PRP$	VBN VBN PRP$ JJ NNS	B
freight-transport	JJ	VBN PRP$ JJ NNS TO	I
costs	NNS	PRP$ JJ NNS TO VB	I
to	TO	JJ NNS TO VB ,	O
decrease	VB	NNS TO VB , VBN	O
,	,	TO VB , VBN IN	O
compared	VBN	VB , VBN IN CD	O
with	IN	, VBN IN CD NN	O
30	CD	VBN IN CD NN WP	B
%	NN	IN CD NN WP VBD	I
who	WP	CD NN WP VBD VBN	B
had	VBD	NN WP VBD VBN TO	O
looked	VBN	WP VBD VBN TO VB	O
to	TO	VBD VBN TO VB NN	O
freight	VB	VBN TO VB NN TO	B
transport	NN	TO VB NN TO VB	I
to	TO	VB NN TO VB NNS	O
reduce	VB	NN TO VB NNS IN	O
costs	NNS	TO VB NNS IN JJ	B
in	IN	VB NNS IN JJ NNS	O
past	JJ	NNS IN JJ NNS .	B
years	NNS	IN JJ NNS .	I
.	.	JJ NNS .	O

``	``	`` DT VBZ	O
This	DT	`` DT VBZ DT	B
is	VBZ	`` DT VBZ DT JJ	O
the	DT	DT VBZ DT JJ NN	B
first	JJ	VBZ DT JJ NN IN	I
year	NN	DT JJ NN IN NN	I
since	IN	JJ NN IN NN NN	O
transportation	NN	NN IN NN NN IN	B
deregulation	NN	IN NN NN IN CD	I
in	IN	NN NN IN CD IN	O
1980	CD	NN IN CD IN PRP	B
that	IN	IN CD IN PRP VBP	O
we	PRP	CD IN PRP VBP VBN	B
have	VBP	IN PRP VBP VBN JJ	O
had	VBN	PRP VBP VBN JJ DT	O
such	JJ	VBP VBN JJ DT JJ	B
a	DT	VBN JJ DT JJ CC	I
dramatic	JJ	JJ DT JJ CC JJ	I
and	CC	DT JJ CC JJ NN	I
broad-based	JJ	JJ CC JJ NN IN	I
upturn	NN	CC JJ NN IN VBN	I
in	IN	JJ NN IN VBN NN	O
perceived	VBN	NN IN VBN NN NNS	B
transportation	NN	IN VBN NN NNS ,	I
rates	NNS	VBN NN NNS , ''	I
,	,	NN NNS , '' VBD	O
''	''	NNS , '' VBD NNP	O
said	VBD	, '' VBD NNP NNP	O
Bernard	NNP	'' VBD NNP NNP ,	B
LaLonde	NNP	VBD NNP NNP , DT	I
,	,	NNP NNP , DT NN	O
a	DT	NNP , DT NN NNS	B
transportation	NN	, DT NN NNS NN	I
logistics	NNS	DT NN NNS NN IN	I
professor	NN	NN NNS NN IN NNP	I
at	IN	NNS NN IN NNP NNP	O
Ohio	NNP	NN IN NNP NNP IN	B
State	NNP	IN NNP NNP IN NNP	I
in	IN	NNP NNP IN NNP .	O
Columbus	NNP	NNP IN NNP .	B
.	.	IN NNP .	O

The	DT	DT NN IN	B
deregulation	NN	DT NN IN NNS	I
of	IN	DT NN IN NNS CC	O
railroads	NNS	NN IN NNS CC NN	B
and	CC	IN NNS CC NN NNS	I
trucking	NN	NNS CC NN NNS WDT	I
companies	NNS	CC NN NNS WDT VBD	I
that	WDT	NN NNS WDT VBD IN	B
began	VBD	NNS WDT VBD IN CD	O
in	IN	WDT VBD IN CD VBD	O
1980	CD	VBD IN CD VBD NNS	B
enabled	VBD	IN CD VBD NNS TO	O
shippers	NNS	CD VBD NNS TO VB	B
to	TO	VBD NNS TO VB IN	O
bargain	VB	NNS TO VB IN NN	O
for	IN	TO VB IN NN .	O
transportation	NN	VB IN NN .	B
.	.	IN NN .	O

Carriers	NNP	NNP MD VB	B
could	MD	NNP MD VB PRP$	O
use	VB	NNP MD VB PRP$ NN	O
their	PRP$	MD VB PRP$ NN RBR	B
equipment	NN	VB PRP$ NN RBR RB	I
more	RBR	PRP$ NN RBR RB ,	O
efficiently	RB	NN RBR RB , VBG	O
,	,	RBR RB , VBG TO	O
leading	VBG	RB , VBG TO NN	O
to	TO	, VBG TO NN PRP	O
overcapacity	NN	VBG TO NN PRP VBD	B
they	PRP	TO NN PRP VBD JJ	B
were	VBD	NN PRP VBD JJ TO	O
eager	JJ	PRP VBD JJ TO VB	O
to	TO	VBD JJ TO VB .	O
fill	VB	JJ TO VB .	O
.	.	TO VB .	O

Shippers	NNS	NNS VBP RB	B
cut	VBP	NNS VBP RB $	O
about	RB	NNS VBP RB $ CD	B
$	$	VBP RB $ CD CD	I
35	CD	RB $ CD CD IN	I
billion	CD	$ CD CD IN PRP$	I
from	IN	CD CD IN PRP$ JJ	O
their	PRP$	CD IN PRP$ JJ ,	B
annual	JJ	IN PRP$ JJ , JJ	I
,	,	PRP$ JJ , JJ NN	I
inter-city	JJ	JJ , JJ NN CC	I
truck	NN	, JJ NN CC NN	I
and	CC	JJ NN CC NN NNS	I
rail	NN	NN CC NN NNS ,	I
costs	NNS	CC NN NNS , TO	I
,	,	NN NNS , TO RB	O
to	TO	NNS , TO RB $	O
about	RB	, TO RB $ CD	B
$	$	TO RB $ CD CD	I
150	CD	RB $ CD CD ,	I
billion	CD	$ CD CD , CC	I
,	,	CD CD , CC IN	O
or	CC	CD , CC IN CD	O
about	IN	, CC IN CD NN	B
6.4	CD	CC IN CD NN IN	I
%	NN	IN CD NN IN JJ	I
of	IN	CD NN IN JJ JJ	O
gross	JJ	NN IN JJ JJ NN	B
national	JJ	IN JJ JJ NN ,	I
product	NN	JJ JJ NN , RB	I
,	,	JJ NN , RB IN	O
down	RB	NN , RB IN CD	O
from	IN	, RB IN CD NN	O
8	CD	RB IN CD NN IN	B
%	NN	IN CD NN IN NNP	I
of	IN	CD NN IN NNP IN	O
GNP	NNP	NN IN NNP IN CD	B
in	IN	IN NNP IN CD .	O
1981	CD	NNP IN CD .	B
.	.	IN CD .	O

But	CC	CC IN NN	O
with	IN	CC IN NN IN	O
much	NN	CC IN NN IN DT	B
of	IN	IN NN IN DT NN	O
the	DT	NN IN DT NN VBN	B
inefficiency	NN	IN DT NN VBN IN	I
squeezed	VBN	DT NN VBN IN IN	O
out	IN	NN VBN IN IN DT	O
of	IN	VBN IN IN DT JJ	O
the	DT	IN IN DT JJ NN	B
freight-transport	JJ	IN DT JJ NN ,	I
system	NN	DT JJ NN , VBG	I
,	,	JJ NN , VBG NNS	O
rising	VBG	NN , VBG NNS VBP	B
costs	NNS	, VBG NNS VBP JJ	I
are	VBP	VBG NNS VBP JJ TO	O
likely	JJ	NNS VBP JJ TO VB	O
to	TO	VBP JJ TO VB VBN	O
be	VB	JJ TO VB VBN RB	O
reflected	VBN	TO VB VBN RB IN	O
directly	RB	VB VBN RB IN JJR	O
in	IN	VBN RB IN JJR NN	O
higher	JJR	RB IN JJR NN NNS	B
freight	NN	IN JJR NN NNS .	I
rates	NNS	JJR NN NNS .	I
.	.	NN NNS .	O

``	``	`` NNS VBP	O
Shippers	NNS	`` NNS VBP VBG	B
are	VBP	`` NNS VBP VBG ``	O
saying	VBG	NNS VBP VBG `` DT	O
`	``	VBP VBG `` DT NN	O
the	DT	VBG `` DT NN POS	B
party	NN	`` DT NN POS IN	I
's	POS	DT NN POS IN ,	O
over	IN	NN POS IN , ''	O
,	,	POS IN , '' ''	O
'	''	IN , '' '' VBD	O
''	''	, '' '' VBD NNP	O
said	VBD	'' '' VBD NNP NNP	O
Mr.	NNP	'' VBD NNP NNP .	B
LaLonde	NNP	VBD NNP NNP .	I
.	.	NNP NNP .	O

``	``	`` NNS MD	O
Shippers	NNS	`` NNS MD RB	B
wo	MD	`` NNS MD RB VB	O
n't	RB	NNS MD RB VB JJ	O
be	VB	MD RB VB JJ TO	O
able	JJ	RB VB JJ TO VB	O
to	TO	VB JJ TO VB IN	O
look	VB	JJ TO VB IN JJ	O
for	IN	TO VB IN JJ NNS	O
transportation-cost	JJ	VB IN JJ NNS IN	B
savings	NNS	IN JJ NNS IN PRP	I
as	IN	JJ NNS IN PRP VBP	O
they	PRP	NNS IN PRP VBP IN	B
have	VBP	IN PRP VBP IN DT	O
for	IN	PRP VBP IN DT JJ	O
the	DT	VBP IN DT JJ CD	B
last	JJ	IN DT JJ CD CC	I
eight	CD	DT JJ CD CC CD	I
or	CC	JJ CD CC CD NNS	I
nine	CD	CD CC CD NNS .	I
years	NNS	CC CD NNS .	I
.	.	CD NNS .	O

Transport	NN	NN NNS MD	B
rates	NNS	NN NNS MD RB	I
wo	MD	NN NNS MD RB VB	O
n't	RB	NNS MD RB VB DT	O
be	VB	MD RB VB DT NN	O
an	DT	RB VB DT NN IN	B
opportunity	NN	VB DT NN IN VBG	I
for	IN	DT NN IN VBG NN	O
offsetting	VBG	NN IN VBG NN NNS	O
cost	NN	IN VBG NN NNS IN	B
increases	NNS	VBG NN NNS IN JJ	I
in	IN	NN NNS IN JJ NNS	O
other	JJ	NNS IN JJ NNS IN	B
segments	NNS	IN JJ NNS IN DT	I
of	IN	JJ NNS IN DT NN	O
the	DT	NNS IN DT NN .	B
economy	NN	IN DT NN . ''	I
.	.	DT NN . ''	O
''	''	NN . ''	O

Robert	NNP	NNP NNP ,	B
Delaney	NNP	NNP NNP , DT	I
,	,	NNP NNP , DT NN	O
a	DT	NNP , DT NN IN	B
consultant	NN	, DT NN IN NNP	I
at	IN	DT NN IN NNP NNP	O
Arthur	NNP	NN IN NNP NNP NNP	B
D.	NNP	IN NNP NNP NNP NNP	I
Little	NNP	NNP NNP NNP NNP ,	I
Inc.	NNP	NNP NNP NNP , NNP	I
,	,	NNP NNP , NNP ,	O
Cambridge	NNP	NNP , NNP , NNP	B
,	,	, NNP , NNP ,	O
Mass.	NNP	NNP , NNP , VBD	B
,	,	, NNP , VBD ``	O
said	VBD	NNP , VBD `` PRP	O
``	``	, VBD `` PRP VBP	O
We	PRP	VBD `` PRP VBP VBN	B
've	VBP	`` PRP VBP VBN PDT	O
gotten	VBN	PRP VBP VBN PDT DT	O
all	PDT	VBP VBN PDT DT NNS	B
the	DT	VBN PDT DT NNS IN	I
benefits	NNS	PDT DT NNS IN NN	I
of	IN	DT NNS IN NN IN	O
deregulation	NN	NNS IN NN IN JJ	B
in	IN	IN NN IN JJ NNS	O
freight-cost	JJ	NN IN JJ NNS .	B
reductions	NNS	IN JJ NNS .	I
.	.	JJ NNS .	O

Now	RB	RB PRP VBP	O
we	PRP	RB PRP VBP VBG	B
are	VBP	RB PRP VBP VBG TO	O
starting	VBG	PRP VBP VBG TO VB	O
to	TO	VBP VBG TO VB JJ	O
see	VB	VBG TO VB JJ JJ	O
real	JJ	TO VB JJ JJ NNS	B
freight-rate	JJ	VB JJ JJ NNS IN	I
increases	NNS	JJ JJ NNS IN NNS	I
as	IN	JJ NNS IN NNS VBP	O
carriers	NNS	NNS IN NNS VBP NN	B
replace	VBP	IN NNS VBP NN ,	O
equipment	NN	NNS VBP NN , VB	B
,	,	VBP NN , VB JJR	O
pay	VB	NN , VB JJR NN	O
higher	JJR	, VB JJR NN NNS	B
fuel	NN	VB JJR NN NNS CC	I
costs	NNS	JJR NN NNS CC VB	I
and	CC	NN NNS CC VB JJR	O
pay	VB	NNS CC VB JJR IN	O
more	JJR	CC VB JJR IN NN	B
for	IN	VB JJR IN NN .	O
labor	NN	JJR IN NN .	B
.	.	IN NN .	O

You	PRP	PRP MD VB	B
'll	MD	PRP MD VB NNS	O
see	VB	PRP MD VB NNS VB	O
carriers	NNS	MD VB NNS VB TO	B
try	VB	VB NNS VB TO VB	O
to	TO	NNS VB TO VB DT	O
recoup	VB	VB TO VB DT IN	O
some	DT	TO VB DT IN DT	B
of	IN	VB DT IN DT NN	O
the	DT	DT IN DT NN VBG	B
price	NN	IN DT NN VBG WDT	I
cutting	VBG	DT NN VBG WDT VBD	I
that	WDT	NN VBG WDT VBD RB	B
occurred	VBD	VBG WDT VBD RB .	O
previously	RB	WDT VBD RB . ''	O
.	.	VBD RB . ''	O
''	''	RB . ''	O

Not	RB	RB NN VBZ	B
everyone	NN	RB NN VBZ IN	I
believes	VBZ	RB NN VBZ IN DT	O
that	IN	NN VBZ IN DT JJ	O
the	DT	VBZ IN DT JJ NNS	B
good	JJ	IN DT JJ NNS VBP	I
times	NNS	DT JJ NNS VBP IN	I
are	VBP	JJ NNS VBP IN IN	O
over	IN	NNS VBP IN IN NNS	O
for	IN	VBP IN IN NNS .	O
shippers	NNS	IN IN NNS .	B
.	.	IN NNS .	O

``	``	`` EX VBZ	O
There	EX	`` EX VBZ RB	B
's	VBZ	`` EX VBZ RB DT	O
still	RB	EX VBZ RB DT NN	O
a	DT	VBZ RB DT NN IN	B
lot	NN	RB DT NN IN NN	I
of	IN	DT NN IN NN IN	O
pressure	NN	NN IN NN IN NNS	B
on	IN	IN NN IN NNS IN	O
rates	NNS	NN IN NNS IN DT	B
in	IN	IN NNS IN DT NN	O
both	DT	NNS IN DT NN CC	B
rail	NN	IN DT NN CC NN	I
and	CC	DT NN CC NN ,	I
truck	NN	NN CC NN , ''	I
,	,	CC NN , '' VBD	O
''	''	NN , '' VBD NNP	O
said	VBD	, '' VBD NNP NNP	O
Gerard	NNP	'' VBD NNP NNP ,	B
McCullough	NNP	VBD NNP NNP , NN	I
,	,	NNP NNP , NN IN	O
lecturer	NN	NNP , NN IN NN	B
in	IN	, NN IN NN IN	O
transportation	NN	NN IN NN IN NNP	B
at	IN	IN NN IN NNP NNP	O
Massachusetts	NNP	NN IN NNP NNP IN	B
Institute	NNP	IN NNP NNP IN NNP	I
of	IN	NNP NNP IN NNP .	O
Technology	NNP	NNP IN NNP .	B
.	.	IN NNP .	O

Less-than-truckload	JJ	JJ NNS ,	B
companies	NNS	JJ NNS , WDT	I
,	,	JJ NNS , WDT VBP	O
which	WDT	NNS , WDT VBP DT	B
carry	VBP	, WDT VBP DT NN	O
the	DT	WDT VBP DT NN IN	B
freight	NN	VBP DT NN IN JJ	I
of	IN	DT NN IN JJ NNS	O
several	JJ	NN IN JJ NNS IN	B
shippers	NNS	IN JJ NNS IN DT	I
in	IN	JJ NNS IN DT NN	O
each	DT	NNS IN DT NN NN	B
truck	NN	IN DT NN NN ,	I
trailer	NN	DT NN NN , VBD	I
,	,	NN NN , VBD RB	O
discounted	VBD	NN , VBD RB DT	O
away	RB	, VBD RB DT CD	O
a	DT	VBD RB DT CD NN	B
4.7	CD	RB DT CD NN NN	I
%	NN	DT CD NN NN NN	I
rate	NN	CD NN NN NN VBD	I
increase	NN	NN NN NN VBD JJ	I
implemented	VBD	NN NN VBD JJ NNP	O
last	JJ	NN VBD JJ NNP .	B
April	NNP	VBD JJ NNP .	I
.	.	JJ NNP .	O

The	DT	DT NNS VBD	B
carriers	NNS	DT NNS VBD VBG	I
were	VBD	DT NNS VBD VBG RB	O
competing	VBG	NNS VBD VBG RB IN	O
fiercely	RB	VBD VBG RB IN NN	O
for	IN	VBG RB IN NN NN	O
market	NN	RB IN NN NN .	B
share	NN	IN NN NN .	I
.	.	NN NN .	O

Railroad-rate	JJ	JJ NNS VBP	B
increases	NNS	JJ NNS VBP JJ	I
are	VBP	JJ NNS VBP JJ TO	O
likely	JJ	NNS VBP JJ TO VB	O
to	TO	VBP JJ TO VB VBN	O
be	VB	JJ TO VB VBN IN	O
restrained	VBN	TO VB VBN IN VBG	O
by	IN	VB VBN IN VBG JJ	O
weakening	VBG	VBN IN VBG JJ NNS	B
rail-traffic	JJ	IN VBG JJ NNS CC	I
levels	NNS	VBG JJ NNS CC JJ	I
and	CC	JJ NNS CC JJ NN	O
keen	JJ	NNS CC JJ NN IN	B
competition	NN	CC JJ NN IN NN	I
for	IN	JJ NN IN NN IN	O
freight	NN	NN IN NN IN NNS	B
from	IN	IN NN IN NNS .	O
trucks	NNS	NN IN NNS .	B
.	.	IN NNS .	O

An	DT	DT NN IN	B
official	NN	DT NN IN NNP	I
at	IN	DT NN IN NNP NNP	O
Consolidated	NNP	NN IN NNP NNP NNP	B
Freightways	NNP	IN NNP NNP NNP ,	I
Inc.	NNP	NNP NNP NNP , DT	I
,	,	NNP NNP , DT NNP	O
a	DT	NNP , DT NNP NNP	B
Menlo	NNP	, DT NNP NNP ,	I
Park	NNP	DT NNP NNP , NNP	I
,	,	NNP NNP , NNP ,	I
Calif.	NNP	NNP , NNP , JJ	I
,	,	, NNP , JJ NN	I
less-than-truckload	JJ	NNP , JJ NN ,	I
carrier	NN	, JJ NN , VBD	I
,	,	JJ NN , VBD NN	O
said	VBD	NN , VBD NN NN	O
rate	NN	, VBD NN NN IN	B
discounting	NN	VBD NN NN IN DT	I
in	IN	NN NN IN DT NN	O
that	DT	NN IN DT NN VBZ	B
industry	NN	IN DT NN VBZ VBN	I
has	VBZ	DT NN VBZ VBN TO	O
begun	VBN	NN VBZ VBN TO ``	O
to	TO	VBZ VBN TO `` VB	O
``	``	VBN TO `` VB .	O
stabilize	VB	TO `` VB . ''	O
.	.	`` VB . ''	O
''	''	VB . ''	O

Consolidated	NNP	NNP NNP VBZ	B
Freightways	NNP	NNP NNP VBZ TO	I
plans	VBZ	NNP NNP VBZ TO VB	O
to	TO	NNP VBZ TO VB PRP$	O
raise	VB	VBZ TO VB PRP$ NNS	O
its	PRP$	TO VB PRP$ NNS CD	B
rates	NNS	VB PRP$ NNS CD NN	I
5.3	CD	PRP$ NNS CD NN JJ	B
%	NN	NNS CD NN JJ DT	I
late	JJ	CD NN JJ DT NN	B
this	DT	NN JJ DT NN CC	I
year	NN	JJ DT NN CC JJ	I
or	CC	DT NN CC JJ JJ	O
early	JJ	NN CC JJ JJ NN	B
next	JJ	CC JJ JJ NN ,	I
year	NN	JJ JJ NN , CC	I
,	,	JJ NN , CC IN	O
and	CC	NN , CC IN JJS	O
at	IN	, CC IN JJS CD	B
least	JJS	CC IN JJS CD NNS	I
two	CD	IN JJS CD NNS VBP	I
competitors	NNS	JJS CD NNS VBP VBN	I
have	VBP	CD NNS VBP VBN JJ	O
announced	VBN	NNS VBP VBN JJ NNS	O
similar	JJ	VBP VBN JJ NNS .	B
increases	NNS	VBN JJ NNS .	I
.	.	JJ NNS .	O