rfc2224.txt

来自「中、英文RFC文档大全打包下载完全版 .」· 文本 代码 · 共 620 行 · 第 1/2 页

TXT
620
字号
   filehandle, then the client should attempt to resolve the <url-path>   to a filehandle using the MOUNT protocol.   Version 1 of the MOUNT protocol is described in Appendix A of RFC   1094 and version 3 in Appendix I of RFC 1813. Version 2 of the MOUNT   protocol is identical to version 1 except for the addition of a   procedure MOUNTPROC_PATHCONF which returns POSIX pathconf information   from the server.   Note that the pathname sent to the server in the MOUNTPROC_MNT   request is assumed to be a server native path, rather than a slash-   separated path described by RFC 1738.  Hence, the MOUNT protocol can   reasonably be expected to map a <url-path> to a filehandle only on   servers that support slash-separated ASCII native paths.  In general,   servers that do not support WebNFS access or slash-separated ASCII   native paths should not advertise NFS URLs.   At this point the client must already have some indication as to   which version of the NFS protocol is supported on the server.  Since   the filehandle format differs between NFS versions 2 and 3, the   client must select the appropriate version of the MOUNT protocol.   MOUNT versions 1 and 2 return only NFS version 2 filehandles, whereas   MOUNT version 3 returns NFS version 3 filehandles.Callaghan                    Informational                      [Page 6]RFC 2224                     NFS URL Scheme                 October 1997   Unlike the NFS service, the MOUNT service is not registered on a   well-known port.  The client must use the PORTMAP service to locate   the server's MOUNT port before it can transmit a MOUNTPROC_MNT   request to retrieve the filehandle corresponding to the requested   path.       Client                                       Server       ------                                       ------       -------------- MOUNT port ? -------------->  Portmapper       <-------------- Port=984 ------------------       ------- Filehandle for /export/foo ?  ---->  Mountd @ port 984       <--------- Filehandle=0xf82455ce0..  ------   NFS servers commonly use a client's successful MOUNTPROC_MNT request   request as an indication that the client has "mounted" the filesystem   and may maintain this information in a file that lists the   filesystems that clients currently have mounted.  This information is   removed from the file when the client transmits an MOUNTPROC_UMNT   request.  Upon receiving a successful reply to a MOUNTPROC_MNT   request, a WebNFS client should send a MOUNTPROC_UMNT request to   prevent an accumulation of "mounted" records on the server.8.0 Bibliography   [RFC1738]       Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L. and M. McCahill,                   "Uniform Resource Locators (URL)," RFC 1738,                   December 1994.   [RFC1808]       Fielding, R., "Relative Uniform Resource Locators,"                   RFC 1808, June 1995.   [RFC1831]       Srinivasan, R., "RPC: Remote Procedure Call                   Protocol Specification Version 2," RFC 1831,                   August 1995.   [RFC1832]       Srinivasan, R., "XDR: External Data Representation                   Standard," RFC 1832, August 1995.   [RFC1833]       Srinivasan, R., "Binding Protocols for ONC RPC                   Version 2," RFC 1833, August 1995.   [RFC1094]       Sun Microsystems, Inc., "Network Filesystem                   Specification," RFC 1094, March 1989.Callaghan                    Informational                      [Page 7]RFC 2224                     NFS URL Scheme                 October 1997   [RFC1813]       Callaghan, B., Pawlowski, B. and P. Staubach,                   "NFS Version 3 Protocol Specification," RFC 1813,                   June 1995.   [RFC2054]       Callaghan, B., "WebNFS Client Specification,"                   RFC 2054, October 1996.   [RFC2055]       Callaghan, B., "WebNFS Server Specification,"                   RFC 2055, October 1996.   [Sandberg]      Sandberg, R., D. Goldberg, S. Kleiman, D. Walsh,                   B.  Lyon, "Design and Implementation of the Sun                   Network Filesystem," USENIX Conference                   Proceedings, USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA,                   Summer 1985.  The basic paper describing the                   SunOS implementation of the NFS version 2                   protocol, and discusses the goals, protocol                   specification and trade-offs.   [X/OpenNFS]     X/Open Company, Ltd., X/Open CAE Specification:                   Protocols for X/Open Internetworking: XNFS,                   X/Open Company, Ltd., Apex Plaza, Forbury Road,                   Reading Berkshire, RG1 1AX, United Kingdom,                   1991.  This is an indispensable reference for                   the NFS and accompanying protocols, including                   the Lock Manager and the Portmapper.   [X/OpenPCNFS]   X/Open Company, Ltd., X/Open CAE Specification:                   Protocols for X/Open Internetworking: (PC)NFS,                   Developer's Specification, X/Open Company, Ltd.,                   Apex Plaza, Forbury Road, Reading Berkshire, RG1                   1AX, United Kingdom, 1991.  This is an                   indispensable reference for NFS protocol and                   accompanying protocols, including the Lock Manager                   and the Portmapper.9. Security Considerations   Since the WebNFS server features are based on NFS protocol versions 2   and 3, the RPC based security considerations described in RFC 1094,   RFC 1831, and RFC 1832 apply here also.   Server implementors should be careful when implementing multi-   component lookup that the client cannot obtain unauthorized access to   files or directories. For example: a path that includes multiple   occurrences of "../" may locate a filesystem outside of the exported   filesystem associated with the public filehandle.Callaghan                    Informational                      [Page 8]RFC 2224                     NFS URL Scheme                 October 1997   Clients and servers may separately negotiate secure connection   schemes for authentication, data integrity, and privacy.10. BNF for NFS URL Scheme   The syntax of the NFS URL is a subset of the Generic URL syntax   described in RFC 1738.  An NFS URL does not include user or password   components, nor does it recognize "?" query or "#" fragment   components.      nfsURL        = "nfs" ":" relativeURL      relativeURL   = net_path | abs_path | rel_path      net_path      = "//" hostport [ abs_path ]      abs_path      = "/"  rel_path      rel_path      = [ path_segments ]      hostport      = host [ ":" port ]      host          = hostname | hostnumber      hostname      = *( domainlabel "." ) toplabel      domainlabel   = alphanum | alphanum *( alphanum | "-" ) alphanum      toplabel      = alpha | alpha *( alphanum | "-" ) alphanum      hostnumber    = 1*digit "." 1*digit "." 1*digit "." 1*digit      port          = *digit      url-path      = [ "/" ] path_segments      path_segments = segment *( "/" segment )      segment       = *pchar      pchar         = unreserved | escaped | ":" | "@" | "&" | "=" | "+"      reserved      = ";" | "/" | "?" | ":" | "@" | "&" | "=" | "+"      unreserved    = alpha | digit | mark      mark          = "$" | "-" | "_" | "." | "!" | "~" |                      "*" | "'" | "(" | ")" | ","      escaped       = "%" hex hex      hex           = digit | "A" | "B" | "C" | "D" | "E" | "F" |                              "a" | "b" | "c" | "d" | "e" | "f"      alphanum      = alpha | digit      alpha         = lowalpha | upalpha      lowalpha = "a" | "b" | "c" | "d" | "e" | "f" | "g" | "h" | "i" |                 "j" | "k" | "l" | "m" | "n" | "o" | "p" | "q" | "r" |                 "s" | "t" | "u" | "v" | "w" | "x" | "y" | "z"      upalpha  = "A" | "B" | "C" | "D" | "E" | "F" | "G" | "H" | "I" |                 "J" | "K" | "L" | "M" | "N" | "O" | "P" | "Q" | "R" |                 "S" | "T" | "U" | "V" | "W" | "X" | "Y" | "Z"      digit    = "0" | "1" | "2" | "3" | "4" | "5" | "6" | "7" |                 "8" | "9"Callaghan                    Informational                      [Page 9]RFC 2224                     NFS URL Scheme                 October 199711. Acknowledgements   This specification was extensively reviewed by the NFS group at   SunSoft and brainstormed by Michael Eisler.12. Author's Address   Address comments related to this RFC to:      brent@eng.sun.com   Brent Callaghan   Sun Microsystems, Inc.   Mailstop Mpk17-201,   901 San Antonio Road,   Palo Alto, California 94303   Phone: 1-415-786-5067   EMail: brent.callaghan@eng.sun.com   Fax:   1-415-786-5896Callaghan                    Informational                     [Page 10]RFC 2224                     NFS URL Scheme                 October 199713.  Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1997).  All Rights Reserved.   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it   or assist in its implmentation may be prepared, copied, published   andand distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than   English.   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE."Callaghan                    Informational                     [Page 11]

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?