📄 rfc2299.txt
字号:
RFC 2299 Summary of 2200-2299 January 19992221 Gahrns Oct 1997 IMAP4 Login ReferralsWhen dealing with large amounts of users and many IMAP4 [RFC-2060]servers, it is often necessary to move users from one IMAP4 server toanother. Login referrals allow clients to transparently connect to analternate IMAP4 server, if their home IMAP4 server has changed.[STANDARDS-TRACK]2220 Guenther Oct 1997 The Application/MARC Content- typeThis memorandum provides a mechanism for representing objects which arefiles of Machine-Readable Cataloging records (MARC). The MARC formatsare standards for the representation and communication of bibliographicand related information. A MARC record contains metadata for aninformation resource following MARC format specifications. This memoprovides information for the Internet community. It does not specify anInternet standard of any kind.2219 Hamilton Oct 1997 Use of DNS Aliases for Network ServicesIt has become a common practice to use symbolic names (usually CNAMEs)in the Domain Name Service (DNS - [RFC-1034, RFC-1035]) to refer tonetwork services such as anonymous FTP [RFC-959] servers, Gopher [RFC-1436] servers, and most notably World-Wide Web HTTP [RFC-1945] servers.This is desirable for a number of reasons. It provides a way of movingservices from one machine to another transparently, and a mechanism bywhich people or agents may programmatically discover that anorganization runs, say, a World-Wide Web server. Although this approachhas been almost universally adopted, there is no standards document orsimilar specification for these commonly used names. This documentseeks to rectify this situation by gathering together the extant'folklore' on naming conventions, and proposes a mechanism foraccommodating new protocols. This document specifies an Internet BestCurrent Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussionand suggestions for improvements.2218 Genovese Oct 1997 A Common Schema for the Internet White Pages ServiceThis document specifies the minimum set of core attributes of a WhitePages entry for an individual and describes how new objects with thoseattributes can be defined and published. [STANDARDS-TRACK]Ramos Informational [Page 19]RFC 2299 Summary of 2200-2299 January 19992217 Clark Oct 1997 Telnet Com Port Control OptionThis memo proposes a protocol to allow greater use of modems attached toa network for outbound dialing purposes. This memo defines anExperimental Protocol for the Internet community.2216 Shenker Sep 1997 Network Element Service Specification TemplateThis document defines a framework for specifying services provided bynetwork elements, and available to applications, in an internetworkwhich offers multiple qualities of service. The document first providessome necessary context -- including relevant definitions and suggesteddata formats -- and then specifies a "template" which servicespecification documents should follow. This memo provides informationfor the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard ofany kind.2215 Shenker Sep 1997 General Characterization Parameters for Integrated Service Network ElementsThis memo defines a set of general control and characterizationparameters for network elements supporting the IETF integrated servicesQoS control framework. [STANDARDS-TRACK]2214 Baker Sep 1997 Integrated Services Management Information Base Guaranteed Service Extensions using SMIv2This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) foruse with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. Inparticular, it defines objects for managing the the interface attributesdefined in the Guaranteed Service of the Integrated Services Model.[STANDARDS-TRACK]2213 Baker Sep 1997 Integrated Services Management Information Base using SMIv2This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) foruse with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. Inparticular, it defines objects for managing the the interface attributesdefined in the Integrated Services Model. [STANDARDS-TRACK]Ramos Informational [Page 20]RFC 2299 Summary of 2200-2299 January 19992212 Shenker Sep 1997 Specification of Guaranteed Quality of ServiceThis memo describes the network element behavior required to deliver aguaranteed service (guaranteed delay and bandwidth) in the Internet.[STANDARDS-TRACK]2211 Wroclawski Sep 1997 Specification of the Controlled-Load Network Element ServiceThis memo specifies the network element behavior required to deliverControlled-Load service in the Internet. [STANDARDS-TRACK]2210 Wroclawski Sep 1997 The Use of RSVP with IETF Integrated ServicesThis note describes the use of the RSVP resource reservation protocolwith the Controlled-Load and Guaranteed QoS control services.[STANDARDS-TRACK]2209 Braden Sep 1997 Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1 Message Processing RulesThis memo contains an algorithmic description of the rules used by anRSVP implementation for processing messages. It is intended to clarifythe version 1 RSVP protocol specification. This memo providesinformation for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internetstandard of any kind.2208 Mankin Sep 1997 Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) Version 1 Applicability Statement Some Guidelines on DeploymentThis document describes the applicability of RSVP along with theIntegrated Services protocols and other components of resourcereservation and offers guidelines for deployment of resource reservationat this time. This memo provides information for the Internet community.It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.Ramos Informational [Page 21]RFC 2299 Summary of 2200-2299 January 19992207 Berger Sep 1997 RSVP Extensions for IPSEC Data FlowsThis document presents extensions to Version 1 of RSVP. Theseextensions permit support of individual data flows using RFC 1826, IPAuthentication Header (AH) or RFC 1827, IP Encapsulating SecurityPayload (ESP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]2206 Baker Sep 1997 RSVP Management Information This memo defines a portion ofThis memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) foruse with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. Inparticular, it defines objects for managing the Resource ReservationProtocol (RSVP) within the interface attributes defined in theIntegrated Services Model. [STANDARDS-TRACK]2205 Braden Sep 1997 Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP)--Version 1 Functional SpecificationThis memo describes version 1 of RSVP, a resource reservation setupprotocol designed for an integrated services Internet. RSVP providesreceiver-initiated setup of resource reservations for multicast orunicast data flows, with good scaling and robustness properties.[STANDARDS-TRACK]2204 Nash Sep 1997 ODETTE File Transfer ProtocolThis memo describes a file transfer protocol to facilitate electronicdata interchange between trading partners. This memo providesinformation for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internetstandard of any kind.2203 Eisler Sep 1997 RPCSEC_GSS Protocol SpecificationThis memo describes an ONC/RPC security flavor that allows RPC protocolsto access the Generic Security Services Application ProgrammingInterface (referred to henceforth as GSS-API). [STANDARDS-TRACK]Ramos Informational [Page 22]RFC 2299 Summary of 2200-2299 January 19992202 Cheng Sep 1997 Test Cases for HMAC-MD5 and HMAC-SHA-1This document provides two sets of test cases for HMAC-MD5 and HMAC-SHA-1, respectively. HMAC-MD5 and HMAC-SHA-1 are two constructs of theHMAC [HMAC] message authentication function using the MD5 [MD5] hashfunction and the SHA-1 [SHA] hash function. This memo providesinformation for the Internet community. This memo does not specify anInternet standard of any kind.2201 Ballardie Sep 1997 Core Based Trees (CBT) Multicast Routing ArchitectureCBT is a multicast routing architecture that builds a single deliverytree per group which is shared by all of the group's senders andreceivers. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internetcommunity.2200 IAB Jun 1997 INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDSA discussion of the standardization process and the RFC document seriesis presented first, followed by an explanation of the terms. Sections6.2 - 6.10 contain the lists of protocols in each stage ofstandardization. Finally are pointers to references and contacts forfurther information. [STANDARDS-TRACK]Security Considerations There are no security issues in this Informational RFC.Author's Address Alegre Ramos University of Southern California Information Sciences Institute 4676 Admiralty Way Marina del Rey, CA 90292 Phone: (310) 822-1511 EMail: ramos@isi.eduRamos Informational [Page 23]RFC 2299 Summary of 2200-2299 January 1999Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Ramos Informational [Page 24]
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -