⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc1250.txt

📁 中、英文RFC文档大全打包下载完全版 .
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 5 页
字号:
   in response to notifications (5) to the RFC Editor.  Documents from   Area Directors or Working Group Chairs may be considered in the same   way as documents from "other".5.2.  The Standards Track Diagram   There is a part of the STATUS and STATE categorization that is called   the standards track.  Actually, only the changes of state are   significant to the progression along the standards track, though the   status assignments may be changed as well.   The states illustrated by single line boxes are temporary states,   those illustrated by double line boxes are long term states.  A   protocol will normally be expected to remain in a temporary state for   several months (minimum four months for proposed standard, minimum   six months for draft standard).  A protocol may be in a long term   state for many years.   A protocol may enter the standards track only on the recommendation   of the IESG and by action of the IAB; and may move from one state to   another along the track only on the recommendation of the IESG and by   action of the IAB.  That is, it takes both the IESG and the IAB to   either start a protocol on the track or to move it along.   Generally, as the protocol enters the standards track a decision is   made as to the eventual STATUS, requirement level or applicability   (elective, recommended, or required) the protocol will have, although   a somewhat less stringent current status may be assigned, and it then   is placed in the the proposed standard STATE with that status.  So   the initial placement of a protocol is into state 1.  At any time the   STATUS decision may be revisited.Internet Activities Board                                      [Page 12]RFC 1250                     IAB Standards                   August 1991         |         +<----------------------------------------------+         |                                               ^         V    0                                          |    4   +-----------+                                   +===========+   |   enter   |-->----------------+-------------->|experiment |   +-----------+                   |               +=====+=====+                                   |                     |                                   V    1                |                             +-----------+               V                             | proposed  |-------------->+                        +--->+-----+-----+               |                        |          |                     |                        |          V    2                |                        +<---+-----+-----+               V                             | draft std |-------------->+                        +--->+-----+-----+               |                        |          |                     |                        |          V    3                |                        +<---+=====+=====+               V                             | standard  |-------------->+                             +=====+=====+               |                                                         |                                                         V    5                                                   +=====+=====+                                                   | historic  |                                                   +===========+   The transition from proposed standard (1) to draft standard (2) can   only be by action of the IAB on the recommendation of the IESG and   only after the protocol has been proposed standard (1) for at least   four months.   The transition from draft standard (2) to standard (3) can only be by   action of the IAB on the recommendation of the IESG and only after   the protocol has been draft standard (2) for at least six months.   Occasionally, the decision may be that the protocol is not ready for   standardization and will be assigned to the experimental state (4).   This is off the standards track, and the protocol may be resubmitted   to enter the standards track after further work.  There are other   paths into the experimental and historic states that do not involve   IAB action.   Sometimes one protocol is replaced by another and thus becomes   historic, or it may happen that a protocol on the standards track is   in a sense overtaken by another protocol (or other events) and   becomes historic (state 5).Internet Activities Board                                      [Page 13]RFC 1250                     IAB Standards                   August 19916.  The Protocols   Subsection 6.1 lists recent RFCs and other changes.  Subsections 6.2   - 6.9 list the standards in groups by protocol state.6.1.  Recent Changes6.1.1.  New RFCs:      1252 - OSPF Version 2 MIB             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1251 - Who's Who in the Internet             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1250 - This memo.      1249 - DIXIE Protocol Specification             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1248 - OSPF Version 2 MIB             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1247 - OSPF Version 2             A Draft Standard protocol.      1246 - Experience with the OSPF Protocol             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1245 - OSPF Protocol Analysis             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1244 - Site Security Handbook             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.Internet Activities Board                                      [Page 14]RFC 1250                     IAB Standards                   August 1991      1243 - AppleTalk Management Information Base             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1242 - Benchmarking Terminology for Network Interconnection             Devices             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1241 - A Scheme for an Internet Encapsulation Protocol: Version 1             This is a new Experimental protocol.      1240 - OSI Connectionless Transport Services             on top of UDP - Version: 1             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1239 - Reassignment of Experimental MIBs to Standard MIBs             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1238 - CLNS MIB - for use with Connectionless Network             Protocol (ISO 8473) and End System to Intermediate             System (ISO 9542)             This is a new Experimental protocol.      1237 - Guidelines for OSI NSAP Allocation in the Internet             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1236 - IP to X.121 Address Mapping for DDN             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1235 - The Coherent File Distribution Protocol             This is a new Experimental protocol.      1234 - Tunneling IPX Traffic through IP Networks             A Proposed Standard protocol.Internet Activities Board                                      [Page 15]RFC 1250                     IAB Standards                   August 1991      1233 - Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS3 Interface Type             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1232 - Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS1 Interface Type             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1231 - IEEE 802.5 Token Ring MIB             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1230 - IEEE 802.4 Token Bus MIB             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1229 - Extensions to the Generic-Interface MIB             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1228 - SNMP-DPI - Simple Network Management Protocol Distributed             Program Interface             This is a new Experimental protocol.      1227 - SNMP MUX Protocol and MIB             This is a new Experimental protocol.      1226 - Internet Protocol Encapsulation of AX.25 Frames             This is a new Experimental protocol.      1225 - Post Office Protocol - Version 3             A Draft Standard protocol.      1224 - Techniques for Managing Asynchronously Generated Alerts             This is a new Experimental protocol.      1223 - OSI CLNS and LLC1 Protocols on Network Systems HYPERchannel             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.Internet Activities Board                                      [Page 16]RFC 1250                     IAB Standards                   August 1991      1222 - Advancing the NSFNET Routing Architecture             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1221 - Host Access Protocol (HAP) Specification - Version 2             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.      1220 - Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions for Bridging             A Proposed Standard protocol.      1219 - On the Assignment of Subnet Numbers             This is an information document and does not specify any             level of standard.6.1.2.  Other Changes:   The following are changes to protocols listed in the previous   edition.      1213 - Management Information Base for Network Management             of TCP/IP-based internets: MIB-II             Advanced to Standard protocol.      1212 - Concise MIB Definitions             Advanced to Draft Standard protocol.      Section 6.6 on Telnet Options has been added.

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -