📄 rfc2249.txt
字号:
RFC 2249 Mail Monitoring MIB January 1998 "The entry holding information regarding accumulated errors for each MTA group." INDEX {applIndex, mtaGroupIndex, mtaStatusCode} ::= {mtaGroupErrorTable 1}MtaGroupErrorEntry ::= SEQUENCE { mtaGroupInboundErrorCount Counter32, mtaGroupInternalErrorCount Counter32, mtaGroupOutboundErrorCount Counter32}mtaGroupInboundErrorCount OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter32 MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Count of the number of errors of a given type that have been accumulated in assocation with a particular group while processing incoming messages. In the case of SMTP these will typically be errors reporting by an SMTP server to the remote client; in the case of X.400 these will typically be errors encountered while processing an incoming message." ::= {mtaGroupErrorEntry 1}mtaGroupInternalErrorCount OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter32 MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Count of the number of errors of a given type that have been accumulated in assocation with a particular group during internal MTA processing." ::= {mtaGroupErrorEntry 2}mtaGroupOutboundErrorCount OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter32 MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Count of the number of errors of a given type that have been accumulated in assocation with a particular group's outbound connection activities. In the case of an SMTP client these will typically be errors reported whileFreed & Kille Standards Track [Page 22]RFC 2249 Mail Monitoring MIB January 1998 attempting to contact or while communicating with the remote SMTP server. In the case of X.400 these will typically be errors encountered while constructing or attempting to deliver an outgoing message." ::= {mtaGroupErrorEntry 3}-- Conformance informationmtaConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mta 4}mtaGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mtaConformance 1}mtaCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mtaConformance 2}-- Compliance statementsmtaCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMPv2 entities which implement the Mail Monitoring MIB for basic monitoring of MTAs." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS {mtaGroup} ::= {mtaCompliances 1}mtaAssocCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMPv2 entities which implement the Mail Monitoring MIB for monitoring of MTAs and their associations." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS {mtaGroup, mtaAssocGroup} ::= {mtaCompliances 2}mtaErrorCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMPv2 entities which implement the Mail Monitoring MIB for monitoring of MTAs and detailed errors." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS {mtaGroup, mtaErrorGroup} ::= {mtaCompliances 3}mtaFullCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTIONFreed & Kille Standards Track [Page 23]RFC 2249 Mail Monitoring MIB January 1998 "The compliance statement for SNMPv2 entities which implement the full Mail Monitoring MIB for monitoring of MTAs, associations, and detailed errors." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS {mtaGroup, mtaAssocGroup, mtaErrorGroup} ::= {mtaCompliances 4}-- Units of conformancemtaGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { mtaReceivedMessages, mtaStoredMessages, mtaTransmittedMessages, mtaReceivedVolume, mtaStoredVolume, mtaTransmittedVolume, mtaReceivedRecipients, mtaStoredRecipients, mtaTransmittedRecipients, mtaSuccessfulConvertedMessages, mtaFailedConvertedMessages, mtaGroupReceivedMessages, mtaGroupRejectedMessages, mtaGroupStoredMessages, mtaGroupTransmittedMessages, mtaGroupReceivedVolume, mtaGroupStoredVolume, mtaGroupTransmittedVolume, mtaGroupReceivedRecipients, mtaGroupStoredRecipients, mtaGroupTransmittedRecipients, mtaGroupOldestMessageStored, mtaGroupInboundAssociations, mtaGroupOutboundAssociations, mtaLoopsDetected, mtaGroupAccumulatedInboundAssociations, mtaGroupAccumulatedOutboundAssociations, mtaGroupLastInboundActivity, mtaGroupLastOutboundActivity, mtaGroupLastOutboundAssociationAttempt, mtaGroupRejectedInboundAssociations, mtaGroupFailedOutboundAssociations, mtaGroupInboundRejectionReason, mtaGroupOutboundConnectFailureReason, mtaGroupScheduledRetry, mtaGroupMailProtocol, mtaGroupName, mtaGroupSuccessfulConvertedMessages, mtaGroupFailedConvertedMessages, mtaGroupDescription, mtaGroupURL, mtaGroupCreationTime, mtaGroupHierarchy, mtaGroupOldestMessageId, mtaGroupLoopsDetected} STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A collection of objects providing basic monitoring of MTAs." ::= {mtaGroups 1}mtaAssocGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { mtaGroupAssociationIndex} STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A collection of objects providing monitoring of MTA associations."Freed & Kille Standards Track [Page 24]RFC 2249 Mail Monitoring MIB January 1998 ::= {mtaGroups 2}mtaErrorGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { mtaGroupInboundErrorCount, mtaGroupInternalErrorCount, mtaGroupOutboundErrorCount} STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A collection of objects providing monitoring of detailed MTA errors." ::= {mtaGroups 3}END7. Changes made since RFC 1566 The only changes made to this document since it was issued as RFC 1566 [11] are the following: (1) A number of DESCRIPTION fields have been reworded, hopefully making them clearer. (2) mtaGroupDescription and mtaGroupURL fields have been added. These fields are intended to identify and describe the MTA and the various MTA groups. (3) The time since the last outbound association attempt is now distinct from the time since the last successfuol outbound association attempt. (4) Conversion operation counters have been added. (5) A mechanism to explicitly describe group hierarchies has been added. (6) A mechanism to count specific sorts of errors has been added. (7) A field for the ID of the oldest message in a group's queue has been added. (8) Per-MTA and per-group message loop counters have been added. (9) A new table has been added to keep track of any errors an MTA encounters.Freed & Kille Standards Track [Page 25]RFC 2249 Mail Monitoring MIB January 19988. Acknowledgements This document is a work product of the Mail and Directory Management (MADMAN) Working Group of the IETF. It is based on an earlier MIB designed by S. Kille, T. Lenggenhager, D. Partain, and W. Yeong. The Electronic Mail Association's TSC committee was instrumental in providing feedback on and suggesting enhancements to RFC 1566 [11] that have led to the present document.9. References [1] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1902, January 1996. [2] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1903, January 1996. [3] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1904, January 1996. [4] SNMPv2 Working Grou, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996. [5] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1906, January 1996. [6] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Management Information Base for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1907, January 1996. [7] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Coexistence between Version 1 and Version 2 of the Internet-standard Network Management Framework", RFC 1908, January 1996. [8] Freed, N., and S. Kille, "The Network Services Monitoring MIB", RFC 2248, January 1998. [9] Kille, S., "A String Representation of Distinguished Names", RFC 1779, March 1995.Freed & Kille Standards Track [Page 26]RFC 2249 Mail Monitoring MIB January 1998 [10] Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L. and M. McCahill, Uniform Resource Locators (URL)", RFC 1738, December 1994. [11] Freed, N. and S. Kille, "Mail Monitoring MIB", RFC 1566, January 1994. [12] Kille, S., "Mapping between X.400(1988) / ISO 10021 and RFC 822", RFC 1327, May 1992. [13] Crocker, D., "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text Message", RFC 822, August 1982. [14] Vaudreuil, G., "Enhanced Mail System Status Codes", RFC 1893, January 1996.10. Security Considerations This MIB does not offer write access, and as such cannot be used to actively attack a system. However, this MIB does provide passive information about the existance, type, and configuration of applications on a given host that could potentially indicate some sort of vulnerability. Finally, the information MIB provides about network usage could be used to analyze network traffic patterns.11. Author and Chair Addresses Ned Freed Innosoft International, Inc. 1050 Lakes Drive West Covina, CA 91790 USA Phone: +1 626 919 3600 Fax: +1 626 919 3614 EMail: ned.freed@innosoft.com Steve Kille, MADMAN WG Chair ISODE Consortium The Dome, The Square Richmond TW9 1DT UK Phone: +44 181 332 9091 EMail: S.Kille@isode.comFreed & Kille Standards Track [Page 27]RFC 2249 Mail Monitoring MIB January 199812. Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. RPOFreed & Kille Standards Track [Page 28]
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -