📄 patch-notes.txt
字号:
From roessler@does-not-exist.org Wed Nov 7 11:49:56 2001Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:49:56 +0100From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>To: mutt-dev@mutt.orgSubject: To those shipping patches (v2)MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowedStatus: ROContent-Length: 1273Lines: 34You folks have convinced me that the old patchlist was almost the right way to go for mutt identifying what patches have been applied.Thus, I've implemented this scheme (and will commit it to the CVS in a moment): There's a new file called PATCHES in the source tree, which will be empty in the official distribution.This file's format is one patch ID per line. Patch IDs should be the same as the file names used for distributing patches. The format for these file names should be this: patch-<version>.<initials>.<patch-description>.<patchlevel>That is, Vsevolod's NNTP patch for mutt-1.3.42 could be named like this: patch-1.3.42.vvv.nntp.1 From PATCHES, patchlist.c will be automatically generated. In order to properly construct PATCHES, please include the following chunk with your patch, replacing <your-id-here> by your patch ID.------------------------------snip--------------------------------- PATCHES~ Tue Nov 6 19:59:33 2001+++ PATCHES Tue Nov 6 19:59:42 2001@@ -1,0 +1 @@+<your-id-here>------------------------------snip------------------------------The patch IDs will be displayed when mutt is run with the 'v' command line switch.-- Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -