📄 rpl_insert_ignore.test
字号:
# Testcase for BUG#6287 "Slave skips auto_increment values in Replication with InnoDB"# The bug was that if on master, INSERT IGNORE ignored some# rows, and the table was InnoDB with auto_inc column, then on slave# some rows received an auto_inc bigger than on master.# Slave needs to be started with --innodb to store table in InnoDB.# Same test for MyISAM (which had no bug).-- source include/have_innodb.inc-- source include/master-slave.incCREATE TABLE t1 ( a int unsigned not null auto_increment primary key, b int unsigned, unique (b)) ENGINE=innodb;CREATE TABLE t2 ( a int unsigned, # to force INSERT SELECT to have a certain order b int unsigned) ENGINE=innodb;INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (NULL, 1);INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (NULL, 2);INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (NULL, 3);INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (NULL, 4);# An alternation of values which will conflict in t1 and will not.INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (1, 1);INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (2, 2);INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (3, 5);INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (4, 3);INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (5, 4);INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (6, 6);INSERT IGNORE INTO t1 SELECT NULL, t2.b FROM t2 ORDER BY t2.a;# Compare resultsSELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY a;sync_slave_with_master;SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY a;# Now do the same for MyISAMconnection master;drop table t1;CREATE TABLE t1 ( a int unsigned not null auto_increment primary key, b int unsigned, unique (b)) ENGINE=myisam;INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1, 1);INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (2, 2);INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (3, 3);INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (4, 4);INSERT IGNORE INTO t1 SELECT NULL, t2.b FROM t2 ORDER BY t2.a;SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY a;sync_slave_with_master;SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY a;connection master;drop table t1, t2;sync_slave_with_master;# End of 4.1 tests
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -