wholecontrol.m

f-xlms算法程序 非常有用的消噪用的程序

Fs = 8000;
N = 800;
delayS = 7;
[B,A] = cheby2(4,20,[0.04 0.5]);
Hd = dfilt.df2t(B,A);
H = filter(Hd,[zeros(1,delayS) log(0.99*rand(1,N-delayS)+0.01).*sign(randn(1,N-delayS)).*exp(-0.01*(1:N-delayS))]);
H = H/norm(H);
t = 1/Fs:1/Fs:N/Fs;
plot(t,H,'b');
xlabel('Time [sec]');
ylabel('Coefficient value');
title('True Secondary Path Impulse Response');
hold;

%% Estimating the Secondary Propagation Path
% The first task in active noise control is to estimate the impulse
% response of the secondary propagation path.  This step is usually 
% performed prior to noise control using a synthetic random signal played 
% through the output loudspeaker while the unwanted noise is not present. 
% The following commands generate 3.75 seconds of this random noise as well 
% as the measured signal at the error microphone.  

ntrS = 30000;
s = randn(1,ntrS);
dS = filter(H,1,s) + 0.01*randn(1,ntrS);

%% Designing the Secondary Propagation Path Estimate
% Typically, the length of the secondary path filter estimate is not as
% long as the actual secondary path and need not be for adequate control
% in most cases.  We shall use a secondary path filter length of 250
% taps, corresponding to an impulse response length of 31 msec. 
% While any adaptive FIR filtering algorithm could be used for this 
% purpose, the normalized LMS algorithm is often used due to its 
% simplicity and robustness. Plots of the output and error signals show
% that the algorithm converges after about 10000 iterations.

M = 250;
muS = 0.1; offsetS = 0.1;
h = adaptfilt.nlms(M,muS,1,offsetS);
[yS,eS] = filter(h,s,dS);

n = 1:ntrS;
plot(n,dS,n,yS,n,eS);
xlabel('Number of iterations');
ylabel('Signal value');
title('Secondary Identification Using the NLMS Adaptive Filter');
legend('Desired Signal','Output Signal','Error Signal');


%% Accuracy of the Secondary Path Estimate
% How accurate is the secondary path impulse response estimate?  This
% plot shows the coefficients of both the true and estimated path.
% Only the tail of the true impulse response is not estimated 
% accurately.  This residual error does not significantly harm the
% performance of the active noise control system during its operation
% in the chosen task. 

Hhat = h.Coefficients;
plot(t,H,t(1:M),Hhat,t,[H(1:M)-Hhat(1:M) H(M+1:N)]);
xlabel('Time [sec]');
ylabel('Coefficient value');
title('Secondary Path Impulse Response Estimation');
legend('True','Estimated','Error');

%% The Primary Propagation Path
% The propagation path of the noise to be cancelled can also be
% characterized by a linear filter.  The following commands
% generate an input-to-error microphone impulse response that is
% bandlimited to the range 200 - 800 Hz and has a filter length of 
% 0.1 seconds.

delayW = 15;
[B,A] = cheby2(5,20,[0.05 0.2]);
Hd2 = dfilt.df2t(B,A);
G = filter(Hd2,[zeros(1,delayW) log(0.99*rand(1,N-delayW)+0.01).*sign(randn(1,N-delayW)).*exp(-0.01*(1:N-delayW))]);
G = G/norm(G);
plot(t,G,'b');
xlabel('Time [sec]');
ylabel('Coefficient value');
title('Primary Path Impulse Response');


%% The Noise to be Cancelled
% Typical active noise control pplications involve the sounds of
% rotating machinery due to their annoying characteristics.  Here,
% we have synthetically generated 7.5 seconds of a noise that 
% might come from a typical electric motor.  Listening to its sound 
% at the error microphone before cancellation, it has the characteristic 
% industrial "whine" of such motors.  The spectrum of the sound
% is also plotted.  

ntrW = 60000;
F0 = 60;
n = 1:ntrW;
A = [0.01 0.01 0.02 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.07 0.02 0.01];
x = zeros(1,ntrW);
for k=1:length(A);
    x = x + A(k)*sin(2*pi*(F0*k/Fs*n+rand(1)));
end
d = filter(G,1,x) + 0.1*randn(1,ntrW);
% [Pd,F] = spectrum(d(ntrW-20000:ntrW),2048,[],[],Fs);
[Pd,F] = pwelch(d(ntrW-20000:ntrW),[],[],2048,Fs);
plot(F,10*log10(Pd(:,1)*Fs));
axis([0 2000 -25 30]);
xlabel('Frequency [Hz]');
% ylabel('Amplitude [dB]');
ylabel('Power Spectrum Estimate [dB]');
title('Spectrum of the Noise to be Cancelled');
sound(d/max(abs(d)),Fs);


%% Active Noise Control using the filtered-X LMS Algorithm
% The most popular adaptive algorithm for active noise control is
% the filtered-X LMS algorithm.  This algorithm uses the secondary
% path estimate to calculate an output signal whose contribution
% at the error sensor destructively interferes with the undesired
% noise.  The reference signal is a noisy version of the undesired
% sound measured near its source.  We shall use a controller filter
% length of about 44 msec and a step size of 0.0001 for these
% signal statistics.  The resulting algorithm converges after about
% 5 seconds of adaptation. Listening to the error signal, the 
% annoying "whine" is reduced considerably.  

xhat = x + 0.1*randn(1,ntrW);
L = 350;
muW = 0.0001;
h = adaptfilt.filtxlms(L,muW,1,Hhat);
[y,e] = filter(h,xhat,d);

%plot(n,d,'b',n,r,'g',n,e,'r');
plot(n,d,'b',n,y,'g',n,e,'r');
xlabel('Number of iterations');
ylabel('Signal value');
title('Active Noise Control Using the Filtered-X LMS Adaptive Controller');
legend('Original Noise','Anti-Noise','Residual Noise');
sound(e/max(abs(e)),Fs);


%% Residual Error Signal Spectrum
% Comparing the spectrum of the residual error signal with that of the
% original noise signal, we see that most of the periodic components 
% have been attenuated considerably.  The steady-state cancellation 
% performance may not be uniform across all frequencies, however.  
% Such is often the case for real-world systems appled to active noise 
% control tasks.

% [Pe,F] = spectrum(e(ntrW-20000:ntrW),2048,[],[],Fs);
[Pe,F] = pwelch(e(ntrW-20000:ntrW),[],[],2048,Fs);
plot(F,10*log10(Pd(:,1)*Fs),'b',F,10*log10(Pe(:,1)*Fs),'r');
axis([0 2000 -25 30]);
xlabel('Frequency [Hz]');
% ylabel('Amplitude [dB]');
ylabel('Power Spectrum Estimate [dB]');
title('Spectra of the Original and Attenuated Noise');