📄 joinrels.c
字号:
* If we already joined IN's RHS to any other rels in either input * path, then this join is not constrained (the necessary work was * done at the lower level where that join occurred). */ if (bms_is_subset(ininfo->righthand, rel1->relids) && !bms_equal(ininfo->righthand, rel1->relids)) continue; if (bms_is_subset(ininfo->righthand, rel2->relids) && !bms_equal(ininfo->righthand, rel2->relids)) continue; /* * JOIN_IN technique will work if outerrel includes LHS and innerrel * is exactly RHS; conversely JOIN_REVERSE_IN handles RHS/LHS. * * JOIN_UNIQUE_OUTER will work if outerrel is exactly RHS; conversely * JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER will work if innerrel is exactly RHS. * * But none of these will work if we already found an OJ or another IN * that needs to trigger here. */ if (jointype != JOIN_INNER) return false; if (bms_is_subset(ininfo->lefthand, rel1->relids) && bms_equal(ininfo->righthand, rel2->relids)) jointype = JOIN_IN; else if (bms_is_subset(ininfo->lefthand, rel2->relids) && bms_equal(ininfo->righthand, rel1->relids)) jointype = JOIN_REVERSE_IN; else if (bms_equal(ininfo->righthand, rel1->relids)) jointype = JOIN_UNIQUE_OUTER; else if (bms_equal(ininfo->righthand, rel2->relids)) jointype = JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER; else return false; /* invalid join path */ } /* Join is valid */ *jointype_p = jointype; return true;}/* * make_join_rel * Find or create a join RelOptInfo that represents the join of * the two given rels, and add to it path information for paths * created with the two rels as outer and inner rel. * (The join rel may already contain paths generated from other * pairs of rels that add up to the same set of base rels.) * * NB: will return NULL if attempted join is not valid. This can happen * when working with outer joins, or with IN clauses that have been turned * into joins. */RelOptInfo *make_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2){ Relids joinrelids; JoinType jointype; RelOptInfo *joinrel; List *restrictlist; /* We should never try to join two overlapping sets of rels. */ Assert(!bms_overlap(rel1->relids, rel2->relids)); /* Construct Relids set that identifies the joinrel. */ joinrelids = bms_union(rel1->relids, rel2->relids); /* Check validity and determine join type. */ if (!join_is_legal(root, rel1, rel2, joinrelids, &jointype)) { /* invalid join path */ bms_free(joinrelids); return NULL; } /* * Find or build the join RelOptInfo, and compute the restrictlist that * goes with this particular joining. */ joinrel = build_join_rel(root, joinrelids, rel1, rel2, jointype, &restrictlist); /* * If we've already proven this join is empty, we needn't consider * any more paths for it. */ if (is_dummy_rel(joinrel)) { bms_free(joinrelids); return joinrel; } /* * Consider paths using each rel as both outer and inner. Depending * on the join type, a provably empty outer or inner rel might mean * the join is provably empty too; in which case throw away any * previously computed paths and mark the join as dummy. (We do it * this way since it's conceivable that dummy-ness of a multi-element * join might only be noticeable for certain construction paths.) */ switch (jointype) { case JOIN_INNER: if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) || is_dummy_rel(rel2)) { mark_dummy_join(joinrel); break; } add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2, JOIN_INNER, restrictlist); add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel2, rel1, JOIN_INNER, restrictlist); break; case JOIN_LEFT: if (is_dummy_rel(rel1)) { mark_dummy_join(joinrel); break; } add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2, JOIN_LEFT, restrictlist); add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel2, rel1, JOIN_RIGHT, restrictlist); break; case JOIN_FULL: if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) && is_dummy_rel(rel2)) { mark_dummy_join(joinrel); break; } add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2, JOIN_FULL, restrictlist); add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel2, rel1, JOIN_FULL, restrictlist); break; case JOIN_RIGHT: if (is_dummy_rel(rel2)) { mark_dummy_join(joinrel); break; } add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2, JOIN_RIGHT, restrictlist); add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel2, rel1, JOIN_LEFT, restrictlist); break; case JOIN_IN: if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) || is_dummy_rel(rel2)) { mark_dummy_join(joinrel); break; } add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2, JOIN_IN, restrictlist); /* REVERSE_IN isn't supported by joinpath.c */ add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2, JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER, restrictlist); add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel2, rel1, JOIN_UNIQUE_OUTER, restrictlist); break; case JOIN_REVERSE_IN: if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) || is_dummy_rel(rel2)) { mark_dummy_join(joinrel); break; } /* REVERSE_IN isn't supported by joinpath.c */ add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel2, rel1, JOIN_IN, restrictlist); add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2, JOIN_UNIQUE_OUTER, restrictlist); add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel2, rel1, JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER, restrictlist); break; case JOIN_UNIQUE_OUTER: if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) || is_dummy_rel(rel2)) { mark_dummy_join(joinrel); break; } add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2, JOIN_UNIQUE_OUTER, restrictlist); add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel2, rel1, JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER, restrictlist); break; case JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER: if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) || is_dummy_rel(rel2)) { mark_dummy_join(joinrel); break; } add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2, JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER, restrictlist); add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel2, rel1, JOIN_UNIQUE_OUTER, restrictlist); break; default: elog(ERROR, "unrecognized join type: %d", (int) jointype); break; } bms_free(joinrelids); return joinrel;}/* * have_join_order_restriction * Detect whether the two relations should be joined to satisfy * a join-order restriction arising from outer joins or IN clauses. * * In practice this is always used with have_relevant_joinclause(), and so * could be merged with that function, but it seems clearer to separate the * two concerns. We need these tests because there are degenerate cases where * a clauseless join must be performed to satisfy join-order restrictions. * * Note: this is only a problem if one side of a degenerate outer join * contains multiple rels, or a clauseless join is required within an IN's * RHS; else we will find a join path via the "last ditch" case in * join_search_one_level(). We could dispense with this test if we were * willing to try bushy plans in the "last ditch" case, but that seems much * less efficient. */boolhave_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2){ bool result = false; ListCell *l; /* * It's possible that the rels correspond to the left and right sides of a * degenerate outer join, that is, one with no joinclause mentioning the * non-nullable side; in which case we should force the join to occur. * * Also, the two rels could represent a clauseless join that has to be * completed to build up the LHS or RHS of an outer join. */ foreach(l, root->oj_info_list) { OuterJoinInfo *ojinfo = (OuterJoinInfo *) lfirst(l); /* ignore full joins --- other mechanisms handle them */ if (ojinfo->is_full_join) continue; /* Can we perform the OJ with these rels? */ if (bms_is_subset(ojinfo->min_lefthand, rel1->relids) && bms_is_subset(ojinfo->min_righthand, rel2->relids)) { result = true; break; } if (bms_is_subset(ojinfo->min_lefthand, rel2->relids) && bms_is_subset(ojinfo->min_righthand, rel1->relids)) { result = true; break; } /* * Might we need to join these rels to complete the RHS? We have to * use "overlap" tests since either rel might include a lower OJ that * has been proven to commute with this one. */ if (bms_overlap(ojinfo->min_righthand, rel1->relids) && bms_overlap(ojinfo->min_righthand, rel2->relids)) { result = true; break; } /* Likewise for the LHS. */ if (bms_overlap(ojinfo->min_lefthand, rel1->relids) && bms_overlap(ojinfo->min_lefthand, rel2->relids)) { result = true; break; } } /* * Similarly, we need to allow a join that completes a degenerate * IN-clause, or one that builds up its LHS or RHS. */ foreach(l, root->in_info_list) { InClauseInfo *ininfo = (InClauseInfo *) lfirst(l); /* Can we perform the IN with these rels? */ if (bms_is_subset(ininfo->lefthand, rel1->relids) && bms_is_subset(ininfo->righthand, rel2->relids)) { result = true; break; } if (bms_is_subset(ininfo->lefthand, rel2->relids) && bms_is_subset(ininfo->righthand, rel1->relids)) { result = true; break; } /* * Might we need to join these rels to complete the RHS? It's * probably overkill to test "overlap", since we never join part of an * IN's RHS to anything else, but may as well keep the coding similar * to the OJ case. */ if (bms_overlap(ininfo->righthand, rel1->relids) && bms_overlap(ininfo->righthand, rel2->relids)) { result = true; break; } /* Likewise for the LHS. */ if (bms_overlap(ininfo->lefthand, rel1->relids) && bms_overlap(ininfo->lefthand, rel2->relids)) { result = true; break; } } /* * We do not force the join to occur if either input rel can legally be * joined to anything else using joinclauses. This essentially means that * clauseless bushy joins are put off as long as possible. The reason is * that when there is a join order restriction high up in the join tree * (that is, with many rels inside the LHS or RHS), we would otherwise * expend lots of effort considering very stupid join combinations within * its LHS or RHS. */ if (result) { if (has_legal_joinclause(root, rel1) || has_legal_joinclause(root, rel2)) result = false; } return result;}/* * has_join_restriction * Detect whether the specified relation has join-order restrictions * due to being inside an outer join or an IN (sub-SELECT). * * Essentially, this tests whether have_join_order_restriction() could * succeed with this rel and some other one. It's OK if we sometimes * say "true" incorrectly. (Therefore, we don't bother with the relatively * expensive has_legal_joinclause test.) */static boolhas_join_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel){ ListCell *l; foreach(l, root->oj_info_list) { OuterJoinInfo *ojinfo = (OuterJoinInfo *) lfirst(l); /* ignore full joins --- other mechanisms preserve their ordering */ if (ojinfo->is_full_join) continue; /* ignore if OJ is already contained in rel */ if (bms_is_subset(ojinfo->min_lefthand, rel->relids) && bms_is_subset(ojinfo->min_righthand, rel->relids)) continue; /* restricted if it overlaps LHS or RHS, but doesn't contain OJ */ if (bms_overlap(ojinfo->min_lefthand, rel->relids) || bms_overlap(ojinfo->min_righthand, rel->relids)) return true; } foreach(l, root->in_info_list) { InClauseInfo *ininfo = (InClauseInfo *) lfirst(l); /* ignore if IN is already contained in rel */ if (bms_is_subset(ininfo->lefthand, rel->relids) && bms_is_subset(ininfo->righthand, rel->relids)) continue; /* restricted if it overlaps LHS or RHS, but doesn't contain IN */ if (bms_overlap(ininfo->lefthand, rel->relids) || bms_overlap(ininfo->righthand, rel->relids)) return true; } return false;}/* * has_legal_joinclause * Detect whether the specified relation can legally be joined * to any other rels using join clauses. * * We consider only joins to single other relations in the current * initial_rels list. This is sufficient to get a "true" result in most real * queries, and an occasional erroneous "false" will only cost a bit more * planning time. The reason for this limitation is that considering joins to * other joins would require proving that the other join rel can legally be * formed, which seems like too much trouble for something that's only a * heuristic to save planning time. (Note: we must look at initial_rels * and not all of the query, since when we are planning a sub-joinlist we * may be forced to make clauseless joins within initial_rels even though * there are join clauses linking to other parts of the query.) */static boolhas_legal_joinclause(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel){ ListCell *lc; foreach(lc, root->initial_rels) { RelOptInfo *rel2 = (RelOptInfo *) lfirst(lc); /* ignore rels that are already in "rel" */ if (bms_overlap(rel->relids, rel2->relids)) continue; if (have_relevant_joinclause(root, rel, rel2)) { Relids joinrelids; JoinType jointype; /* join_is_legal needs relids of the union */ joinrelids = bms_union(rel->relids, rel2->relids); if (join_is_legal(root, rel, rel2, joinrelids, &jointype)) { /* Yes, this will work */ bms_free(joinrelids); return true; } bms_free(joinrelids); } } return false;}/* * is_dummy_rel --- has relation been proven empty? * * If so, it will have a single path that is dummy. */static boolis_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel){ return (rel->cheapest_total_path != NULL && IS_DUMMY_PATH(rel->cheapest_total_path));}/* * Mark a joinrel as proven empty. */static voidmark_dummy_join(RelOptInfo *rel){ /* Set dummy size estimate */ rel->rows = 0; /* Evict any previously chosen paths */ rel->pathlist = NIL; /* Set up the dummy path */ add_path(rel, (Path *) create_append_path(rel, NIL)); /* * Although set_cheapest will be done again later, we do it immediately * in order to keep is_dummy_rel as cheap as possible (ie, not have * to examine the pathlist). */ set_cheapest(rel);}
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -