create_cast.sgml

来自「postgresql8.3.4源码,开源数据库」· SGML 代码 · 共 367 行

SGML
367
字号
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_cast.sgml,v 1.26 2007/06/05 21:31:04 tgl Exp $ --><refentry id="SQL-CREATECAST"> <refmeta>  <refentrytitle id="SQL-CREATECAST-TITLE">CREATE CAST</refentrytitle>  <refmiscinfo>SQL - Language Statements</refmiscinfo> </refmeta> <refnamediv>  <refname>CREATE CAST</refname>  <refpurpose>define a new cast</refpurpose> </refnamediv> <indexterm zone="sql-createcast">  <primary>CREATE CAST</primary> </indexterm> <refsynopsisdiv><synopsis>CREATE CAST (<replaceable>sourcetype</replaceable> AS <replaceable>targettype</replaceable>)    WITH FUNCTION <replaceable>funcname</replaceable> (<replaceable>argtypes</replaceable>)    [ AS ASSIGNMENT | AS IMPLICIT ]CREATE CAST (<replaceable>sourcetype</replaceable> AS <replaceable>targettype</replaceable>)    WITHOUT FUNCTION    [ AS ASSIGNMENT | AS IMPLICIT ]</synopsis> </refsynopsisdiv>   <refsect1 id="sql-createcast-description">  <title>Description</title>  <para>   <command>CREATE CAST</command> defines a new cast.  A cast   specifies how to perform a conversion between   two data types.  For example:<programlisting>SELECT CAST(42 AS float8);</programlisting>   converts the integer constant 42 to type <type>float8</type> by   invoking a previously specified function, in this case   <literal>float8(int4)</>. (If no suitable cast has been defined, the   conversion fails.)  </para>  <para>   Two types can be <firstterm>binary compatible</firstterm>, which   means that they can be converted into one another <quote>for   free</quote> without invoking any function.  This requires that   corresponding values use the same internal representation.  For   instance, the types <type>text</type> and <type>varchar</type> are   binary compatible.  </para>  <para>   By default, a cast can be invoked only by an explicit cast request,   that is an explicit <literal>CAST(<replaceable>x</> AS   <replaceable>typename</>)</literal> or   <replaceable>x</><literal>::</><replaceable>typename</>   construct.  </para>  <para>   If the cast is marked <literal>AS ASSIGNMENT</> then it can be invoked   implicitly when assigning a value to a column of the target data type.   For example, supposing that <literal>foo.f1</literal> is a column of   type <type>text</type>, then:<programlisting>INSERT INTO foo (f1) VALUES (42);</programlisting>   will be allowed if the cast from type <type>integer</type> to type   <type>text</type> is marked <literal>AS ASSIGNMENT</>, otherwise not.   (We generally use the term <firstterm>assignment   cast</firstterm> to describe this kind of cast.)  </para>  <para>   If the cast is marked <literal>AS IMPLICIT</> then it can be invoked   implicitly in any context, whether assignment or internally in an   expression.  (We generally use the term <firstterm>implicit   cast</firstterm> to describe this kind of cast.)   For example, consider this query:<programlisting>SELECT 2 + 4.0;</programlisting>   The parser initially marks the constants as being of type <type>integer</>   and <type>numeric</> respectively.  There is no <type>integer</>   <literal>+</> <type>numeric</> operator in the system catalogs,   but there is a <type>numeric</> <literal>+</> <type>numeric</> operator.   The query will therefore succeed if a cast from <type>integer</> to   <type>numeric</> is available and is marked <literal>AS IMPLICIT</> &mdash;   which in fact it is.  The parser will apply the implicit cast and resolve   the query as if it had been written<programlisting>SELECT CAST ( 2 AS numeric ) + 4.0;</programlisting>  </para>  <para>   Now, the catalogs also provide a cast from <type>numeric</> to   <type>integer</>.  If that cast were marked <literal>AS IMPLICIT</> &mdash;   which it is not &mdash; then the parser would be faced with choosing   between the above interpretation and the alternative of casting the   <type>numeric</> constant to <type>integer</> and applying the   <type>integer</> <literal>+</> <type>integer</> operator.  Lacking any   knowledge of which choice to prefer, it would give up and declare the   query ambiguous.  The fact that only one of the two casts is   implicit is the way in which we teach the parser to prefer resolution   of a mixed <type>numeric</>-and-<type>integer</> expression as   <type>numeric</>; there is no built-in knowledge about that.  </para>  <para>   It is wise to be conservative about marking casts as implicit.  An   overabundance of implicit casting paths can cause   <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> to choose surprising   interpretations of commands, or to be unable to resolve commands at   all because there are multiple possible interpretations.  A good   rule of thumb is to make a cast implicitly invokable only for   information-preserving transformations between types in the same   general type category.  For example, the cast from <type>int2</type> to   <type>int4</type> can reasonably be implicit, but the cast from   <type>float8</type> to <type>int4</type> should probably be   assignment-only.  Cross-type-category casts, such as <type>text</>   to <type>int4</>, are best made explicit-only.  </para>  <para>   To be able to create a cast, you must own the source or the target   data type.  To create a binary-compatible cast, you must be superuser.   (This restriction is made because an erroneous binary-compatible cast   conversion can easily crash the server.)  </para> </refsect1> <refsect1>  <title>Parameters</title>   <variablelist>    <varlistentry>     <term><replaceable>sourcetype</replaceable></term>     <listitem>      <para>       The name of the source data type of the cast.      </para>     </listitem>    </varlistentry>    <varlistentry>     <term><replaceable>targettype</replaceable></term>     <listitem>      <para>       The name of the target data type of the cast.      </para>     </listitem>    </varlistentry>    <varlistentry>     <term><replaceable>funcname</replaceable>(<replaceable>argtypes</replaceable>)</term>     <listitem>      <para>       The function used to perform the cast.  The function name can       be schema-qualified.  If it is not, the function will be looked       up in the schema search path.  The function's result data type must       match the target type of the cast.   Its arguments are discussed below.      </para>     </listitem>    </varlistentry>    <varlistentry>     <term><literal>WITHOUT FUNCTION</literal></term>     <listitem>      <para>       Indicates that the source type and the target type are binary       compatible, so no function is required to perform the cast.      </para>     </listitem>    </varlistentry>    <varlistentry>     <term><literal>AS ASSIGNMENT</literal></term>     <listitem>      <para>       Indicates that the cast can be invoked implicitly in assignment       contexts.      </para>     </listitem>    </varlistentry>    <varlistentry>     <term><literal>AS IMPLICIT</literal></term>     <listitem>      <para>       Indicates that the cast can be invoked implicitly in any context.      </para>     </listitem>    </varlistentry>   </variablelist>  <para>   Cast implementation functions can have one to three arguments.   The first argument type must be identical to the cast's source type.   The second argument,   if present, must be type <type>integer</>; it receives the type   modifier associated with the destination type, or <literal>-1</>   if there is none.  The third argument,   if present, must be type <type>boolean</>; it receives <literal>true</>   if the cast is an explicit cast, <literal>false</> otherwise.   (Bizarrely, the SQL spec demands different behaviors for explicit and   implicit casts in some cases.  This argument is supplied for functions   that must implement such casts.  It is not recommended that you design   your own data types so that this matters.)  </para>  <para>   Ordinarily a cast must have different source and target data types.   However, it is allowed to declare a cast with identical source and   target types if it has a cast implementation function with more than one   argument.  This is used to represent type-specific length coercion   functions in the system catalogs.  The named function is used to   coerce a value of the type to the type modifier value given by its   second argument.  </para>  <para>   When a cast has different source and   target types and a function that takes more than one argument, it   represents converting from one type to another and applying a length   coercion in a single step.  When no such entry is available, coercion   to a type that uses a type modifier involves two steps, one to   convert between data types and a second to apply the modifier.  </para> </refsect1> <refsect1 id="sql-createcast-notes">  <title>Notes</title>  <para>   Use <xref linkend="sql-dropcast"   endterm="sql-dropcast-title"> to remove user-defined casts.  </para>  <para>   Remember that if you want to be able to convert types both ways you   need to declare casts both ways explicitly.  </para> <indexterm zone="sql-createcast">  <primary>cast</primary>  <secondary>I/O conversion</secondary> </indexterm>  <para>   It is normally not necessary to create casts between user-defined types   and the standard string types (<type>text</>, <type>varchar</>, and   <type>char(<replaceable>n</>)</type>).  <productname>PostgreSQL</> will   automatically handle a cast to a string type by invoking the other   type's output function, or conversely handle a cast from a string type   by invoking the other type's input function.  These   automatically-provided casts are known as <firstterm>I/O conversion   casts</>.  I/O conversion casts to string types are treated as   assignment casts, while I/O conversion casts from string types are   explicit-only.  You can override this behavior by declaring your own   cast to replace an I/O conversion cast, but usually the only reason to   do so is if you want the conversion to be more easily invokable than the   standard assignment-only or explicit-only setting.  Another possible   reason is that you want the conversion to behave differently from the   type's I/O function; but that is sufficiently surprising that you   should think twice about whether it's a good idea.  (A small number of   the built-in types do indeed have different behaviors for conversions,   mostly because of requirements of the SQL standard.)  </para>  <para>   Prior to <productname>PostgreSQL</> 7.3, every function that had   the same name as a data type, returned that data type, and took one   argument of a different type was automatically a cast function.   This convention has been abandoned in face of the introduction of   schemas and to be able to represent binary compatible casts in the   system catalogs.  The built-in cast functions still follow this naming   scheme, but they have to be shown as casts in the system catalog   <structname>pg_cast</> as well.  </para>  <para>   While not required, it is recommended that you continue to follow this old   convention of naming cast implementation functions after the target data   type.  Many users are used to being able to cast data types using a   function-style notation, that is   <replaceable>typename</>(<replaceable>x</>).  This notation is in fact   nothing more nor less than a call of the cast implementation function; it   is not specially treated as a cast.  If your conversion functions are not   named to support this convention then you will have surprised users.   Since <productname>PostgreSQL</> allows overloading of the same function   name with different argument types, there is no difficulty in having   multiple conversion functions from different types that all use the   target type's name.  </para>  <note>   <para>    Actually the preceding paragraph is an oversimplification: there are    two cases in which a function-call construct will be treated as a cast    request without having matched it to an actual function.    If a function call <replaceable>name</>(<replaceable>x</>) does not    exactly match any existing function, but <replaceable>name</> is the name    of a data type and <structname>pg_cast</> provides a binary-compatible cast    to this type from the type of <replaceable>x</>, then the call will be    construed as a binary-compatible cast.  This exception is made so that    binary-compatible casts can be invoked using functional syntax, even    though they lack any function.  Likewise, if there is no    <structname>pg_cast</> entry but the cast would be to or from a string    type, the call will be construed as an I/O conversion cast.  This    exception allows I/O conversion casts to be invoked using functional    syntax.   </para>  </note> </refsect1> <refsect1 id="sql-createcast-examples">  <title>Examples</title>  <para>   To create a cast from type <type>bigint</type> to type   <type>int4</type> using the function <literal>int4(bigint)</literal>:<programlisting>CREATE CAST (bigint AS int4) WITH FUNCTION int4(bigint);</programlisting>   (This cast is already predefined in the system.)  </para> </refsect1>  <refsect1 id="sql-createcast-compat">  <title>Compatibility</title>  <para>   The <command>CREATE CAST</command> command conforms to the   <acronym>SQL</acronym> standard,   except that SQL does not make provisions for binary-compatible   types or extra arguments to implementation functions.   <literal>AS IMPLICIT</> is a <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>    extension, too.  </para> </refsect1> <refsect1 id="sql-createcast-seealso">  <title>See Also</title>  <para>   <xref linkend="sql-createfunction" endterm="sql-createfunction-title">,   <xref linkend="sql-createtype" endterm="sql-createtype-title">,   <xref linkend="sql-dropcast" endterm="sql-dropcast-title">  </para> </refsect1></refentry>

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?