📄 grant.sgml
字号:
possible to see the object names, e.g. by querying the system tables. Also, after revoking this permission, existing backends might have statements that have previously performed this lookup, so this is not a completely secure way to prevent object access. </para> <para> For sequences, this privilege allows the use of the <function>currval</function> and <function>nextval</function> functions. </para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>ALL PRIVILEGES</term> <listitem> <para> Grant all of the available privileges at once. The <literal>PRIVILEGES</literal> key word is optional in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>, though it is required by strict SQL. </para> </listitem> </varlistentry> </variablelist> The privileges required by other commands are listed on the reference page of the respective command. </para> </refsect2> <refsect2 id="sql-grant-description-roles"> <title>GRANT on Roles</title> <para> This variant of the <command>GRANT</command> command grants membership in a role to one or more other roles. Membership in a role is significant because it conveys the privileges granted to a role to each of its members. </para> <para> If <literal>WITH ADMIN OPTION</literal> is specified, the member can in turn grant membership in the role to others, and revoke membership in the role as well. Without the admin option, ordinary users cannot do that. However, database superusers can grant or revoke membership in any role to anyone. Roles having <literal>CREATEROLE</> privilege can grant or revoke membership in any role that is not a superuser. </para> <para> Unlike the case with privileges, membership in a role cannot be granted to <literal>PUBLIC</>. Note also that this form of the command does not allow the noise word <literal>GROUP</>. </para> </refsect2> </refsect1> <refsect1 id="SQL-GRANT-notes"> <title>Notes</title> <para> The <xref linkend="sql-revoke" endterm="sql-revoke-title"> command is used to revoke access privileges. </para> <para> When a non-owner of an object attempts to <command>GRANT</> privileges on the object, the command will fail outright if the user has no privileges whatsoever on the object. As long as some privilege is available, the command will proceed, but it will grant only those privileges for which the user has grant options. The <command>GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES</> forms will issue a warning message if no grant options are held, while the other forms will issue a warning if grant options for any of the privileges specifically named in the command are not held. (In principle these statements apply to the object owner as well, but since the owner is always treated as holding all grant options, the cases can never occur.) </para> <para> It should be noted that database superusers can access all objects regardless of object privilege settings. This is comparable to the rights of <literal>root</> in a Unix system. As with <literal>root</>, it's unwise to operate as a superuser except when absolutely necessary. </para> <para> If a superuser chooses to issue a <command>GRANT</> or <command>REVOKE</> command, the command is performed as though it were issued by the owner of the affected object. In particular, privileges granted via such a command will appear to have been granted by the object owner. (For role membership, the membership appears to have been granted by the containing role itself.) </para> <para> <command>GRANT</> and <command>REVOKE</> can also be done by a role that is not the owner of the affected object, but is a member of the role that owns the object, or is a member of a role that holds privileges <literal>WITH GRANT OPTION</literal> on the object. In this case the privileges will be recorded as having been granted by the role that actually owns the object or holds the privileges <literal>WITH GRANT OPTION</literal>. For example, if table <literal>t1</> is owned by role <literal>g1</>, of which role <literal>u1</> is a member, then <literal>u1</> can grant privileges on <literal>t1</> to <literal>u2</>, but those privileges will appear to have been granted directly by <literal>g1</>. Any other member of role <literal>g1</> could revoke them later. </para> <para> If the role executing <command>GRANT</> holds the required privileges indirectly via more than one role membership path, it is unspecified which containing role will be recorded as having done the grant. In such cases it is best practice to use <command>SET ROLE</> to become the specific role you want to do the <command>GRANT</> as. </para> <para> Granting permission on a table does not automatically extend permissions to any sequences used by the table, including sequences tied to <type>SERIAL</> columns. Permissions on sequence must be set separately. </para> <para> Currently, <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> does not support granting or revoking privileges for individual columns of a table. One possible workaround is to create a view having just the desired columns and then grant privileges to that view. </para> <para> Use <xref linkend="app-psql">'s <command>\z</command> command to obtain information about existing privileges, for example:<programlisting>=> \z mytable Access privileges for database "lusitania" Schema | Name | Type | Access privileges --------+---------+-------+--------------------------------------------------- public | mytable | table | {miriam=arwdxt/miriam,=r/miriam,admin=arw/miriam}(1 row)</programlisting> The entries shown by <command>\z</command> are interpreted thus:<programlisting> rolename=xxxx -- privileges granted to a role =xxxx -- privileges granted to PUBLIC r -- SELECT ("read") w -- UPDATE ("write") a -- INSERT ("append") d -- DELETE x -- REFERENCES t -- TRIGGER X -- EXECUTE U -- USAGE C -- CREATE c -- CONNECT T -- TEMPORARY arwdxt -- ALL PRIVILEGES (for tables) * -- grant option for preceding privilege /yyyy -- role that granted this privilege</programlisting> The above example display would be seen by user <literal>miriam</> after creating table <literal>mytable</> and doing:<programlisting>GRANT SELECT ON mytable TO PUBLIC;GRANT SELECT, UPDATE, INSERT ON mytable TO admin;</programlisting> </para> <para> If the <quote>Access privileges</> column is empty for a given object, it means the object has default privileges (that is, its privileges column is null). Default privileges always include all privileges for the owner, and can include some privileges for <literal>PUBLIC</> depending on the object type, as explained above. The first <command>GRANT</> or <command>REVOKE</> on an object will instantiate the default privileges (producing, for example, <literal>{miriam=arwdxt/miriam}</>) and then modify them per the specified request. </para> <para> Notice that the owner's implicit grant options are not marked in the access privileges display. A <literal>*</> will appear only when grant options have been explicitly granted to someone. </para> </refsect1> <refsect1 id="sql-grant-examples"> <title>Examples</title> <para> Grant insert privilege to all users on table <literal>films</literal>:<programlisting>GRANT INSERT ON films TO PUBLIC;</programlisting> </para> <para> Grant all available privileges to user <literal>manuel</literal> on view <literal>kinds</literal>:<programlisting>GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON kinds TO manuel;</programlisting> Note that while the above will indeed grant all privileges if executed by a superuser or the owner of <literal>kinds</literal>, when executed by someone else it will only grant those permissions for which the someone else has grant options. </para> <para> Grant membership in role <literal>admins</> to user <literal>joe</>:<programlisting>GRANT admins TO joe;</programlisting> </para> </refsect1> <refsect1 id="sql-grant-compatibility"> <title>Compatibility</title> <para> According to the SQL standard, the <literal>PRIVILEGES</literal> key word in <literal>ALL PRIVILEGES</literal> is required. The SQL standard does not support setting the privileges on more than one object per command. </para> <para> <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> allows an object owner to revoke his own ordinary privileges: for example, a table owner can make the table read-only to himself by revoking his own INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE privileges. This is not possible according to the SQL standard. The reason is that <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> treats the owner's privileges as having been granted by the owner to himself; therefore he can revoke them too. In the SQL standard, the owner's privileges are granted by an assumed entity <quote>_SYSTEM</>. Not being <quote>_SYSTEM</>, the owner cannot revoke these rights. </para> <para> <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> does not support the SQL-standard functionality of setting privileges for individual columns. </para> <para> The SQL standard provides for a <literal>USAGE</literal> privilege on other kinds of objects: character sets, collations, translations, domains. </para> <para> Privileges on databases, tablespaces, schemas, and languages are <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> extensions. </para> </refsect1> <refsect1> <title>See Also</title> <simpara> <xref linkend="sql-revoke" endterm="sql-revoke-title"> </simpara> </refsect1></refentry>
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -