⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 perllol.pod

📁 视频监控网络部分的协议ddns,的模块的实现代码,请大家大胆指正.
💻 POD
字号:
=head1 NAMEperllol - Manipulating Arrays of Arrays in Perl=head1 DESCRIPTION=head2 Declaration and Access of Arrays of ArraysThe simplest thing to build is an array of arrays (sometimes impreciselycalled a list of lists).  It's reasonably easy to understand, andalmost everything that applies here will also be applicable lateron with the fancier data structures.An array of an array is just a regular old array @AoA that you canget at with two subscripts, like C<$AoA[3][2]>.  Here's a declarationof the array:    # assign to our array, an array of array references    @AoA = (	   [ "fred", "barney" ],	   [ "george", "jane", "elroy" ],	   [ "homer", "marge", "bart" ],    );    print $AoA[2][2];  bartNow you should be very careful that the outer bracket typeis a round one, that is, a parenthesis.  That's because you're assigning toan @array, so you need parentheses.  If you wanted there I<not> to be an @AoA,but rather just a reference to it, you could do something more like this:    # assign a reference to array of array references    $ref_to_AoA = [	[ "fred", "barney", "pebbles", "bambam", "dino", ],	[ "homer", "bart", "marge", "maggie", ],	[ "george", "jane", "elroy", "judy", ],    ];    print $ref_to_AoA->[2][2];Notice that the outer bracket type has changed, and so our access syntaxhas also changed.  That's because unlike C, in perl you can't freelyinterchange arrays and references thereto.  $ref_to_AoA is a reference to anarray, whereas @AoA is an array proper.  Likewise, C<$AoA[2]> is not anarray, but an array ref.  So how come you can write these:    $AoA[2][2]    $ref_to_AoA->[2][2]instead of having to write these:    $AoA[2]->[2]    $ref_to_AoA->[2]->[2]Well, that's because the rule is that on adjacent brackets only (whethersquare or curly), you are free to omit the pointer dereferencing arrow.But you cannot do so for the very first one if it's a scalar containinga reference, which means that $ref_to_AoA always needs it.=head2 Growing Your OwnThat's all well and good for declaration of a fixed data structure,but what if you wanted to add new elements on the fly, or buildit up entirely from scratch?First, let's look at reading it in from a file.  This is something likeadding a row at a time.  We'll assume that there's a flat file in whicheach line is a row and each word an element.  If you're trying to develop an@AoA array containing all these, here's the right way to do that:    while (<>) {	@tmp = split;	push @AoA, [ @tmp ];    }You might also have loaded that from a function:    for $i ( 1 .. 10 ) {	$AoA[$i] = [ somefunc($i) ];    }Or you might have had a temporary variable sitting around with thearray in it.    for $i ( 1 .. 10 ) {	@tmp = somefunc($i);	$AoA[$i] = [ @tmp ];    }It's very important that you make sure to use the C<[]> array referenceconstructor.  That's because this will be very wrong:    $AoA[$i] = @tmp;You see, assigning a named array like that to a scalar just counts thenumber of elements in @tmp, which probably isn't what you want.If you are running under C<use strict>, you'll have to add somedeclarations to make it happy:    use strict;    my(@AoA, @tmp);    while (<>) {	@tmp = split;	push @AoA, [ @tmp ];    }Of course, you don't need the temporary array to have a name at all:    while (<>) {	push @AoA, [ split ];    }You also don't have to use push().  You could just make a direct assignmentif you knew where you wanted to put it:    my (@AoA, $i, $line);    for $i ( 0 .. 10 ) {	$line = <>;	$AoA[$i] = [ split ' ', $line ];    }or even just    my (@AoA, $i);    for $i ( 0 .. 10 ) {	$AoA[$i] = [ split ' ', <> ];    }You should in general be leery of using functions that couldpotentially return lists in scalar context without explicitly statingsuch.  This would be clearer to the casual reader:    my (@AoA, $i);    for $i ( 0 .. 10 ) {	$AoA[$i] = [ split ' ', scalar(<>) ];    }If you wanted to have a $ref_to_AoA variable as a reference to an array,you'd have to do something like this:    while (<>) {	push @$ref_to_AoA, [ split ];    }Now you can add new rows.  What about adding new columns?  If you'redealing with just matrices, it's often easiest to use simple assignment:    for $x (1 .. 10) {	for $y (1 .. 10) {	    $AoA[$x][$y] = func($x, $y);	}    }    for $x ( 3, 7, 9 ) {	$AoA[$x][20] += func2($x);    }It doesn't matter whether those elements are alreadythere or not: it'll gladly create them for you, settingintervening elements to C<undef> as need be.If you wanted just to append to a row, you'd haveto do something a bit funnier looking:    # add new columns to an existing row    push @{ $AoA[0] }, "wilma", "betty";Notice that I I<couldn't> say just:    push $AoA[0], "wilma", "betty";  # WRONG!In fact, that wouldn't even compile.  How come?  Because the argumentto push() must be a real array, not just a reference to such.=head2 Access and PrintingNow it's time to print your data structure out.  Howare you going to do that?  Well, if you want only oneof the elements, it's trivial:    print $AoA[0][0];If you want to print the whole thing, though, you can'tsay    print @AoA;		# WRONGbecause you'll get just references listed, and perl will neverautomatically dereference things for you.  Instead, you have toroll yourself a loop or two.  This prints the whole structure,using the shell-style for() construct to loop across the outerset of subscripts.    for $aref ( @AoA ) {	print "\t [ @$aref ],\n";    }If you wanted to keep track of subscripts, you might do this:    for $i ( 0 .. $#AoA ) {	print "\t elt $i is [ @{$AoA[$i]} ],\n";    }or maybe even this.  Notice the inner loop.    for $i ( 0 .. $#AoA ) {	for $j ( 0 .. $#{$AoA[$i]} ) {	    print "elt $i $j is $AoA[$i][$j]\n";	}    }As you can see, it's getting a bit complicated.  That's whysometimes is easier to take a temporary on your way through:    for $i ( 0 .. $#AoA ) {	$aref = $AoA[$i];	for $j ( 0 .. $#{$aref} ) {	    print "elt $i $j is $AoA[$i][$j]\n";	}    }Hmm... that's still a bit ugly.  How about this:    for $i ( 0 .. $#AoA ) {	$aref = $AoA[$i];	$n = @$aref - 1;	for $j ( 0 .. $n ) {	    print "elt $i $j is $AoA[$i][$j]\n";	}    }=head2 SlicesIf you want to get at a slice (part of a row) in a multidimensionalarray, you're going to have to do some fancy subscripting.  That'sbecause while we have a nice synonym for single elements via thepointer arrow for dereferencing, no such convenience exists for slices.(Remember, of course, that you can always write a loop to do a sliceoperation.)Here's how to do one operation using a loop.  We'll assume an @AoAvariable as before.    @part = ();    $x = 4;    for ($y = 7; $y < 13; $y++) {	push @part, $AoA[$x][$y];    }That same loop could be replaced with a slice operation:    @part = @{ $AoA[4] } [ 7..12 ];but as you might well imagine, this is pretty rough on the reader.Ah, but what if you wanted a I<two-dimensional slice>, such as having$x run from 4..8 and $y run from 7 to 12?  Hmm... here's the simple way:    @newAoA = ();    for ($startx = $x = 4; $x <= 8; $x++) {	for ($starty = $y = 7; $y <= 12; $y++) {	    $newAoA[$x - $startx][$y - $starty] = $AoA[$x][$y];	}    }We can reduce some of the looping through slices    for ($x = 4; $x <= 8; $x++) {	push @newAoA, [ @{ $AoA[$x] } [ 7..12 ] ];    }If you were into Schwartzian Transforms, you would probablyhave selected map for that    @newAoA = map { [ @{ $AoA[$_] } [ 7..12 ] ] } 4 .. 8;Although if your manager accused of seeking job security (or rapidinsecurity) through inscrutable code, it would be hard to argue. :-)If I were you, I'd put that in a function:    @newAoA = splice_2D( \@AoA, 4 => 8, 7 => 12 );    sub splice_2D {	my $lrr = shift; 	# ref to array of array refs!	my ($x_lo, $x_hi,	    $y_lo, $y_hi) = @_;	return map {	    [ @{ $lrr->[$_] } [ $y_lo .. $y_hi ] ]	} $x_lo .. $x_hi;    }=head1 SEE ALSOperldata(1), perlref(1), perldsc(1)=head1 AUTHORTom Christiansen <F<tchrist@perl.com>>Last update: Thu Jun  4 16:16:23 MDT 1998

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -