📄 draft-ietf-dnsop-bad-dns-res-02.txt
字号:
recursive name server should periodically check the performance of all of a zone's name servers to adjust its determination of the best-performing one.Larson & Barber Expires August 16, 2004 [Page 14]Internet-Draft Observed DNS Resolution Misbehavior February 20043. IANA considerations There are no new IANA considerations introduced by this Internet-Draft.Larson & Barber Expires August 16, 2004 [Page 15]Internet-Draft Observed DNS Resolution Misbehavior February 20044. Security considerations Name server and resolver misbehaviors identical or similar to those discussed in this document expose the root and TLD name servers to increased risk of both intentional and unintentional denial of service. We believe that implementation of the recommendations offered in this document will reduce the amount of unnecessary traffic seen at root and TLD name servers, thus reducing the opportunity for an attacker to use such queries to his or her advantage.Larson & Barber Expires August 16, 2004 [Page 16]Internet-Draft Observed DNS Resolution Misbehavior February 20045. Internationalization considerations We do not believe this document introduces any new internationalization considerations to the DNS protocol specification.Larson & Barber Expires August 16, 2004 [Page 17]Internet-Draft Observed DNS Resolution Misbehavior February 2004Normative References [1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [2] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities", STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987. [3] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987. [4] Elz, R. and R. Bush, "Clarifications to the DNS Specification", RFC 2181, July 1997. [5] Andrews, M., "Negative Caching of DNS Queries (DNS NCACHE)", RFC 2308, March 1998. [6] Vixie, P., Thomson, S., Rekhter, Y. and J. Bound, "Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE)", RFC 2136, April 1997. [7] Rekhter, Y., Moskowitz, R., Karrenberg, D., Groot, G. and E. Lear, "Address Allocation for Private Internets", BCP 5, RFC 1918, February 1996. [8] <http://www.as112.net>Authors' Addresses Matt Larson VeriSign, Inc. 21345 Ridgetop Circle Dulles, VA 20166-6503 USA EMail: mlarson@verisign.com Piet Barber VeriSign, Inc. 21345 Ridgetop Circle Dulles, VA 20166-6503 USA EMail: pbarber@verisign.comLarson & Barber Expires August 16, 2004 [Page 18]Internet-Draft Observed DNS Resolution Misbehavior February 2004Intellectual Property Statement The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF Secretariat. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive Director.Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assignees. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATIONLarson & Barber Expires August 16, 2004 [Page 19]Internet-Draft Observed DNS Resolution Misbehavior February 2004 HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.Larson & Barber Expires August 16, 2004 [Page 20]
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -