⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 brlock_tdb.c

📁 samba最新软件
💻 C
📖 第 1 页 / 共 2 页
字号:
/*    Unix SMB/CIFS implementation.   generic byte range locking code - tdb backend   Copyright (C) Andrew Tridgell 1992-2006   Copyright (C) Jeremy Allison 1992-2000      This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or   (at your option) any later version.      This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the   GNU General Public License for more details.      You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License   along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.*//* This module implements a tdb based byte range locking service,   replacing the fcntl() based byte range locking previously   used. This allows us to provide the same semantics as NT */#include "includes.h"#include "system/filesys.h"#include "lib/tdb/include/tdb.h"#include "messaging/messaging.h"#include "lib/dbwrap/dbwrap.h"#include "lib/messaging/irpc.h"#include "libcli/libcli.h"#include "cluster/cluster.h"#include "ntvfs/common/brlock.h"#include "ntvfs/ntvfs.h"#include "param/param.h"/*  in this module a "DATA_BLOB *file_key" is a blob that uniquely identifies  a file. For a local posix filesystem this will usually be a combination  of the device and inode numbers of the file, but it can be anything   that uniquely idetifies a file for locking purposes, as long  as it is applied consistently.*//* this struct is typicaly attached to tcon */struct brl_context {	struct db_context *db;	struct server_id server;	struct messaging_context *messaging_ctx;};/*  the lock context contains the elements that define whether one  lock is the same as another lock*/struct lock_context {	struct server_id server;	uint16_t smbpid;	struct brl_context *ctx;};/* The data in brlock records is an unsorted linear array of these   records.  It is unnecessary to store the count as tdb provides the   size of the record */struct lock_struct {	struct lock_context context;	struct ntvfs_handle *ntvfs;	uint64_t start;	uint64_t size;	enum brl_type lock_type;	void *notify_ptr;};/* this struct is attached to on oprn file handle */struct brl_handle {	DATA_BLOB key;	struct ntvfs_handle *ntvfs;	struct lock_struct last_lock;};/*  Open up the brlock.tdb database. Close it down using  talloc_free(). We need the messaging_ctx to allow for  pending lock notifications.*/static struct brl_context *brl_tdb_init(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct server_id server, 					struct loadparm_context *lp_ctx,				    struct messaging_context *messaging_ctx){	struct brl_context *brl;	brl = talloc(mem_ctx, struct brl_context);	if (brl == NULL) {		return NULL;	}	brl->db = db_tmp_open(brl, lp_ctx, "brlock.tdb", TDB_DEFAULT);	if (brl->db == NULL) {		talloc_free(brl);		return NULL;	}	brl->server = server;	brl->messaging_ctx = messaging_ctx;	return brl;}static struct brl_handle *brl_tdb_create_handle(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct ntvfs_handle *ntvfs, 						    DATA_BLOB *file_key){	struct brl_handle *brlh;	brlh = talloc(mem_ctx, struct brl_handle);	if (brlh == NULL) {		return NULL;	}	brlh->key = *file_key;	brlh->ntvfs = ntvfs;	ZERO_STRUCT(brlh->last_lock);	return brlh;}/*  see if two locking contexts are equal*/static bool brl_tdb_same_context(struct lock_context *ctx1, struct lock_context *ctx2){	return (cluster_id_equal(&ctx1->server, &ctx2->server) &&		ctx1->smbpid == ctx2->smbpid &&		ctx1->ctx == ctx2->ctx);}/*  see if lck1 and lck2 overlap  lck1 is the existing lock. lck2 is the new lock we are   looking at adding*/static bool brl_tdb_overlap(struct lock_struct *lck1, 			    struct lock_struct *lck2){	/* this extra check is not redundent - it copes with locks	   that go beyond the end of 64 bit file space */	if (lck1->size != 0 &&	    lck1->start == lck2->start &&	    lck1->size == lck2->size) {		return true;	}	    	if (lck1->start >= (lck2->start+lck2->size) ||	    lck2->start >= (lck1->start+lck1->size)) {		return false;	}	/* we have a conflict. Now check to see if lck1 really still	 * exists, which involves checking if the process still	 * exists. We leave this test to last as its the most	 * expensive test, especially when we are clustered */	/* TODO: need to do this via a server_id_exists() call, which	 * hasn't been written yet. When clustered this will need to	 * call into ctdb */	return true;} /* See if lock2 can be added when lock1 is in place.*/static bool brl_tdb_conflict(struct lock_struct *lck1, 			 struct lock_struct *lck2){	/* pending locks don't conflict with anything */	if (lck1->lock_type >= PENDING_READ_LOCK ||	    lck2->lock_type >= PENDING_READ_LOCK) {		return false;	}	if (lck1->lock_type == READ_LOCK && lck2->lock_type == READ_LOCK) {		return false;	}	if (brl_tdb_same_context(&lck1->context, &lck2->context) &&	    lck2->lock_type == READ_LOCK && lck1->ntvfs == lck2->ntvfs) {		return false;	}	return brl_tdb_overlap(lck1, lck2);} /* Check to see if this lock conflicts, but ignore our own locks on the same fnum only.*/static bool brl_tdb_conflict_other(struct lock_struct *lck1, struct lock_struct *lck2){	/* pending locks don't conflict with anything */	if (lck1->lock_type >= PENDING_READ_LOCK ||	    lck2->lock_type >= PENDING_READ_LOCK) {		return false;	}	if (lck1->lock_type == READ_LOCK && lck2->lock_type == READ_LOCK) 		return false;	/*	 * note that incoming write calls conflict with existing READ	 * locks even if the context is the same. JRA. See LOCKTEST7	 * in smbtorture.	 */	if (brl_tdb_same_context(&lck1->context, &lck2->context) &&	    lck1->ntvfs == lck2->ntvfs &&	    (lck2->lock_type == READ_LOCK || lck1->lock_type == WRITE_LOCK)) {		return false;	}	return brl_tdb_overlap(lck1, lck2);} /*  amazingly enough, w2k3 "remembers" whether the last lock failure  is the same as this one and changes its error code. I wonder if any  app depends on this?*/static NTSTATUS brl_tdb_lock_failed(struct brl_handle *brlh, struct lock_struct *lock){	/*	 * this function is only called for non pending lock!	 */	/* in SMB2 mode always return NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED! */	if (lock->ntvfs->ctx->protocol == PROTOCOL_SMB2) {		return NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED;	}	/* 	 * if the notify_ptr is non NULL,	 * it means that we're at the end of a pending lock	 * and the real lock is requested after the timout went by	 * In this case we need to remember the last_lock and always	 * give FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT	 */	if (lock->notify_ptr) {		brlh->last_lock = *lock;		return NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT;	}	/* 	 * amazing the little things you learn with a test	 * suite. Locks beyond this offset (as a 64 bit	 * number!) always generate the conflict error code,	 * unless the top bit is set	 */	if (lock->start >= 0xEF000000 && (lock->start >> 63) == 0) {		brlh->last_lock = *lock;		return NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT;	}	/*	 * if the current lock matches the last failed lock on the file handle	 * and starts at the same offset, then FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT should be returned	 */	if (cluster_id_equal(&lock->context.server, &brlh->last_lock.context.server) &&	    lock->context.ctx == brlh->last_lock.context.ctx &&	    lock->ntvfs == brlh->last_lock.ntvfs &&	    lock->start == brlh->last_lock.start) {		return NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT;	}	brlh->last_lock = *lock;	return NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED;}/*  Lock a range of bytes.  The lock_type can be a PENDING_*_LOCK, in  which case a real lock is first tried, and if that fails then a  pending lock is created. When the pending lock is triggered (by  someone else closing an overlapping lock range) a messaging  notification is sent, identified by the notify_ptr*/static NTSTATUS brl_tdb_lock(struct brl_context *brl,			 struct brl_handle *brlh,			 uint16_t smbpid,			 uint64_t start, uint64_t size, 			 enum brl_type lock_type,			 void *notify_ptr){	TDB_DATA kbuf, dbuf;	int count=0, i;	struct lock_struct lock, *locks=NULL;	NTSTATUS status;	struct db_record *rec = NULL;	/* if this is a pending lock, then with the chainlock held we	   try to get the real lock. If we succeed then we don't need	   to make it pending. This prevents a possible race condition	   where the pending lock gets created after the lock that is	   preventing the real lock gets removed */	if (lock_type >= PENDING_READ_LOCK) {		enum brl_type rw = (lock_type==PENDING_READ_LOCK? READ_LOCK : WRITE_LOCK);		/* here we need to force that the last_lock isn't overwritten */		lock = brlh->last_lock;		status = brl_tdb_lock(brl, brlh, smbpid, start, size, rw, NULL);		brlh->last_lock = lock;		if (NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) {			return NT_STATUS_OK;		}	}	kbuf.dptr = brlh->key.data;	kbuf.dsize = brlh->key.length;	rec = brl->db->fetch_locked(brl->db, brl, kbuf);	if (rec == NULL) {		return NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION;	}	dbuf = rec->value;	lock.context.smbpid = smbpid;	lock.context.server = brl->server;	lock.context.ctx = brl;	lock.ntvfs = brlh->ntvfs;	lock.context.ctx = brl;	lock.start = start;	lock.size = size;	lock.lock_type = lock_type;	lock.notify_ptr = notify_ptr;	if (dbuf.dptr) {		/* there are existing locks - make sure they don't conflict */		locks = (struct lock_struct *)dbuf.dptr;		count = dbuf.dsize / sizeof(*locks);		for (i=0; i<count; i++) {			if (brl_tdb_conflict(&locks[i], &lock)) {				status = brl_tdb_lock_failed(brlh, &lock);				goto fail;			}		}	}	/* no conflicts - add it to the list of locks */	locks = talloc_realloc(rec, locks, struct lock_struct, count+1);	if (!locks) {		status = NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY;		goto fail;

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -