⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc4524.txt

📁 samba最新软件
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 4 页
字号:
        documentPublisher              A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.56        documentSeries                 O    0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.8        documentTitle                  A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.12        documentVersion                A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.13        domain                         O    0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.13        domainRelatedObject            O    0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.17        drink                          A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.5        favouriteDrink                 A*   0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.5        friendlyCountry                O    0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.18Zeilenga                    Standards Track                    [Page 19]RFC 4524                COSINE LDAP/X.500 Schema               June 2006        friendlyCountryName            A*   0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.43        homePhone                      A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.20        homePostalAddress              A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.39        homeTelephone                  A*   0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.20        host                           A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.9        info                           A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.4        mail                           A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.3        manager                        A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.10        mobile                         A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.41        mobileTelephoneNumber          A*   0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.41        organizationalStatus           A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.45        pager                          A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.42        pagerTelephoneNumber           A*   0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.42        personalTitle                  A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.40        rFC822LocalPart                O    0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.14        rfc822Mailbox                  A*   0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.3        room                           O    0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.7        roomNumber                     A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.6        secretary                      A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.21        simpleSecurityObject           O    0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.19        singleLevelQuality             A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.50        uniqueIdentifier               A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.44        userClass                      A    0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.8      where Type A is Attribute, Type O is ObjectClass, and *      indicates that the registration is historic in nature.6.  Acknowledgements   This document is based on RFC 1274, by Paul Barker and Steve Kille,   as well as on RFC 2247, by Steve Kill, Mark Wahl, Al Grimstad, Rick   Huber, and Sri Satulari.7.  References7.1.  Normative References   [RFC1034]     Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and                 facilities", STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987.   [RFC1123]     Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -                 Application and Support", STD 3, RFC 1123, October                 1989.   [RFC2119]     Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate                 Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.Zeilenga                    Standards Track                    [Page 20]RFC 4524                COSINE LDAP/X.500 Schema               June 2006   [RFC2181]     Elz, R. and R. Bush, "Clarifications to the DNS                 Specification", RFC 2181, July 1997.   [RFC2247]     Kille, S., Wahl, M., Grimstad, A., Huber, R., and S.                 Sataluri, "Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 Distinguished                 Names", RFC 2247, January 1998.   [RFC2821]     Klensin, J., Ed., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC                 2821, April 2001.   [RFC2822]     Resnick, P., "Internet Message Format", RFC 2822, April                 2001.   [RFC3490]     Faltstrom, P., Hoffman, P., and A. Costello,                 "Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications                 (IDNA)", RFC 3490, March 2003.   [RFC4510]     Zeilenga, K., Ed.,  "Lightweight Directory Access                 Protocol (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map", RFC                 4510, June 2006.   [RFC4512]     Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol                 (LDAP): Directory Information Models", RFC 4512, June                 2006.   [RFC4513]     Harrison, R., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol                 (LDAP): Authentication Methods and Security                 Mechanisms", RFC 4513, June 2006.   [RFC4517]     Legg, S., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol                 (LDAP): Syntaxes and Matching Rules", RC 4517, June                 2006.   [RFC4519]     Sciberras, A., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access                 Protocol (LDAP): Schema for User Applications", RFC                 4519, June 2006.   [X.501]       International Telecommunication Union -                 Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The                 Directory -- Models," X.501(1993) (also ISO/IEC 9594-                 2:1994).7.2.  Informative References   [COSINEpilot] Goodman, D., "PARADISE" section of the March 1991                 INTERNET MONTHLY REPORTS (p. 28-29),                 http://www.iana.org/periodic-reports/imr-mar91.txtZeilenga                    Standards Track                    [Page 21]RFC 4524                COSINE LDAP/X.500 Schema               June 2006   [ISO3166]     International Organization for Standardization, "Codes                 for the representation of names of countries", ISO                 3166.   [RFC1274]     Barker, P. and S. Kille, "The COSINE and Internet X.500                 Schema", RFC 1274, November 1991.   [RFC1279]     Hardcastle-Kille, S., "X.500 and Domains", RFC 1279,                 November 1991.   [RFC1487]     Yeong, W., Howes, T., and S. Kille, "X.500 Lightweight                 Directory Access Protocol", RFC 1487, July 1993.   [RFC2251]     Wahl, M., Howes, T., and S. Kille, "Lightweight                 Directory Access Protocol (v3)", RFC 2251, December                 1997.   [RFC2798]     Smith, M., "Definition of the inetOrgPerson LDAP Object                 Class", RFC 2798, April 2000.   [RFC3494]     Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol                 version 2 (LDAPv2) to Historic Status", RFC 3494, March                 2003.   [RFC4520]     Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority                 (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight Directory                 Access Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 4520.Zeilenga                    Standards Track                    [Page 22]RFC 4524                COSINE LDAP/X.500 Schema               June 2006Appendix A.  Changes since RFC 1274   This document represents a substantial rewrite of RFC 1274.  The   following sections summarize the substantive changes.A.1.  LDAP Short Names   A number of COSINE attribute types have short names in LDAP.      X.500 Name              LDAP Short Name      -------------           ---------------      domainComponent         dc      favoriteDrink           drink      friendCountryName       co      homeTelephoneNumber     homePhone      mobileTelephoneNumber   mobile      pagerTelephoneNumber    pager      rfc822Mailbox           mail      userid                  uid   While the LDAP short names are generally used in LDAP, some   implementations may (for legacy reasons [RFC3494]) recognize the   attribute type by its X.500 name.  Hence, the X.500 names have been   reserved solely for this purpose.   Note: 'uid' and 'dc' are described in [RFC4519].A.2.  pilotObject   The 'pilotObject' object class was not brought forward as its   function is largely replaced by operational attributes introduced in   X.500(93) [X.501] and version 3 of LDAP [RFC4512].  For instance, the   function of the 'lastModifiedBy' and 'lastModifiedTime' attribute   types is now served by the 'creatorsName', 'createTimestamp',   'modifiersName', and 'modifyTimestamp' operational attributes   [RFC4512].A.3.  pilotPerson   The 'pilotPerson' object class was not brought forward as its   function is largely replaced by the 'organizationalPerson' [RFC4512]   object class and its subclasses, such as 'inetOrgPerson' [RFC2798].   Most of the related attribute types (e.g., 'mail', 'manager') were   brought forward as they are used in other object classes.Zeilenga                    Standards Track                    [Page 23]RFC 4524                COSINE LDAP/X.500 Schema               June 2006A.4.  dNSDomain   The 'dNSDomain' object class and related attribute types were not   brought forward as its use is primarily experimental [RFC1279].A.5.  pilotDSA and qualityLabelledData   The 'pilotDSA' and 'qualityLabelledData' object classes, as well as   related attribute types, were not brought forward as its use is   primarily experimental [QoS].A.6.  Attribute Syntaxes   RFC 1274 defined and used caseIgnoreIA5StringSyntax attribute syntax.   This has been replaced with the IA5String syntax and appropriate   matching rules in 'mail' and 'associatedDomain'.   RFC 1274 restricted 'mail' to have non-zero length values.  This   restriction is not reflected in the IA5String syntax used in the   definitions provided in this specification.  However, as values are   to conform to the <Mailbox> production, the 'mail' should not contain   zero-length values.  Unfortunately, the directory service will not   enforce this restriction.Appendix B.  Changes since RFC 2247   The 'domainNameForm' name form was not brought forward as   specification of name forms used in LDAP is left to a future   specification.Editor's Address   Kurt D. Zeilenga   OpenLDAP Foundation   EMail: Kurt@OpenLDAP.orgZeilenga                    Standards Track                    [Page 24]RFC 4524                COSINE LDAP/X.500 Schema               June 2006Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors   retain all their rights.   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Intellectual Property   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).Zeilenga                    Standards Track                    [Page 25]

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -