📄 variantutilities.java
字号:
break;
case Variant.VariantShort: // 2
result = new Short(sourceData.getShort());
break;
case Variant.VariantShort | Variant.VariantByref: // 2
result = new Short(sourceData.getShortRef());
break;
case Variant.VariantInt: // 3
result = new Integer(sourceData.getInt());
break;
case Variant.VariantInt | Variant.VariantByref: // 3
result = new Integer(sourceData.getIntRef());
break;
case Variant.VariantFloat: // 4
result = new Float(sourceData.getFloat());
break;
case Variant.VariantFloat | Variant.VariantByref: // 4
result = new Float(sourceData.getFloatRef());
break;
case Variant.VariantDouble: // 5
result = new Double(sourceData.getDouble());
break;
case Variant.VariantDouble | Variant.VariantByref: // 5
result = new Double(sourceData.getDoubleRef());
break;
case Variant.VariantCurrency: // 6
result = sourceData.getCurrency();
break;
case Variant.VariantCurrency | Variant.VariantByref: // 6
result = sourceData.getCurrencyRef();
break;
case Variant.VariantDate: // 7
result = sourceData.getJavaDate();
break;
case Variant.VariantDate | Variant.VariantByref: // 7
result = sourceData.getJavaDateRef();
break;
case Variant.VariantString: // 8
result = sourceData.getString();
break;
case Variant.VariantString | Variant.VariantByref: // 8
result = sourceData.getStringRef();
break;
case Variant.VariantDispatch: // 9
result = sourceData.getDispatch();
break;
case Variant.VariantDispatch | Variant.VariantByref: // 9
result = sourceData.getDispatchRef(); // Can dispatches even
// be byRef?
break;
case Variant.VariantError: // 10
result = new NotImplementedException(
"toJavaObject() Not implemented for VariantError");
break;
case Variant.VariantBoolean: // 11
result = new Boolean(sourceData.getBoolean());
break;
case Variant.VariantBoolean | Variant.VariantByref: // 11
result = new Boolean(sourceData.getBooleanRef());
break;
case Variant.VariantVariant: // 12 they are always by ref
result = new NotImplementedException(
"toJavaObject() Not implemented for VariantVariant without ByRef");
break;
case Variant.VariantVariant | Variant.VariantByref: // 12
result = sourceData.getVariant();
break;
case Variant.VariantObject: // 13
result = new NotImplementedException(
"toJavaObject() Not implemented for VariantObject");
break;
case Variant.VariantDecimal: // 14
result = sourceData.getDecimal();
break;
case Variant.VariantDecimal | Variant.VariantByref: // 14
result = sourceData.getDecimalRef();
break;
case Variant.VariantByte: // 17
result = new Byte(sourceData.getByte());
break;
case Variant.VariantByte | Variant.VariantByref: // 17
result = new Byte(sourceData.getByteRef());
break;
case Variant.VariantLongInt: // 20
result = new Long(sourceData.getLong());
break;
case Variant.VariantLongInt | Variant.VariantByref: // 20
result = new Long(sourceData.getLongRef());
break;
case Variant.VariantTypeMask: // 4095
result = new NotImplementedException(
"toJavaObject() Not implemented for VariantTypeMask");
break;
case Variant.VariantArray: // 8192
result = new NotImplementedException(
"toJavaObject() Not implemented for VariantArray");
break;
case Variant.VariantByref: // 16384
result = new NotImplementedException(
"toJavaObject() Not implemented for VariantByref");
break;
default:
result = new NotImplementedException("Unknown return type: "
+ type);
// there was a "return result" here that caused defect 1602118
// so it was removed
break;
}// switch (type)
if (result instanceof JacobException) {
throw (JacobException) result;
}
}
return result;
}// toJava()
/**
* Verifies that we have a scale 0 <= x <= 28 and now more than 96 bits of
* data. The roundToMSDecimal method will attempt to adjust a BigDecimal to
* pass this set of tests
*
* @param in
* @throws IllegalArgumentException
* if out of bounds
*/
protected static void validateDecimalScaleAndBits(BigDecimal in) {
BigInteger allWordBigInt = in.unscaledValue();
if (in.scale() > 28) {
// should this cast to a string and call putStringRef()?
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"VT_DECIMAL only supports a maximum scale of 28 and the passed"
+ " in value has a scale of " + in.scale());
} else if (in.scale() < 0) {
// should this cast to a string and call putStringRef()?
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"VT_DECIMAL only supports a minimum scale of 0 and the passed"
+ " in value has a scale of " + in.scale());
} else if (allWordBigInt.bitLength() > 12 * 8) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"VT_DECIMAL supports a maximum of "
+ 12
* 8
+ " bits not counting scale and the number passed in has "
+ allWordBigInt.bitLength());
} else {
// no bounds problem to be handled
}
}
/**
* Largest possible number with scale set to 0
*/
private static final BigDecimal LARGEST_DECIMAL = new BigDecimal(
new BigInteger("ffffffffffffffffffffffff", 16));
/**
* Smallest possible number with scale set to 0. MS doesn't support negative
* scales like BigDecimal.
*/
private static final BigDecimal SMALLEST_DECIMAL = new BigDecimal(
new BigInteger("ffffffffffffffffffffffff", 16).negate());
/**
* Does any validation that couldn't have been fixed by rounding or scale
* modification.
*
* @param in
* The BigDecimal to be validated
* @throws IllegalArgumentException
* if the number is too large or too small or null
*/
protected static void validateDecimalMinMax(BigDecimal in) {
if (in == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"null is not a supported Decimal value.");
} else if (LARGEST_DECIMAL.compareTo(in) < 0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"Value too large for VT_DECIMAL data type:" + in.toString()
+ " integer: " + in.toBigInteger().toString(16)
+ " scale: " + in.scale());
} else if (SMALLEST_DECIMAL.compareTo(in) > 0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"Value too small for VT_DECIMAL data type:" + in.toString()
+ " integer: " + in.toBigInteger().toString(16)
+ " scale: " + in.scale());
}
}
/**
* Rounds the scale and bit length so that it will pass
* validateDecimalScaleBits(). Developers should call this method if they
* really want MS Decimal and don't want to lose precision.
* <p>
* Changing the scale on a number that can fit in an MS Decimal can change
* the number's representation enough that it will round to a number too
* large to be represented by an MS VT_DECIMAL
*
* @param sourceDecimal
* @return BigDecimal a new big decimal that was rounded to fit in an MS
* VT_DECIMAL
*/
public static BigDecimal roundToMSDecimal(BigDecimal sourceDecimal) {
BigInteger sourceDecimalIntComponent = sourceDecimal.unscaledValue();
BigDecimal destinationDecimal = new BigDecimal(
sourceDecimalIntComponent, sourceDecimal.scale());
int roundingModel = BigDecimal.ROUND_HALF_UP;
validateDecimalMinMax(destinationDecimal);
// First limit the number of digits and then the precision.
// Try and round to 29 digits because we can sometimes do that
BigInteger allWordBigInt;
allWordBigInt = destinationDecimal.unscaledValue();
if (allWordBigInt.bitLength() > 96) {
destinationDecimal = destinationDecimal.round(new MathContext(29));
// see if 29 digits uses more than 96 bits
if (allWordBigInt.bitLength() > 96) {
// Dang. It was over 97 bits so shorten it one more digit to
// stay <= 96 bits
destinationDecimal = destinationDecimal.round(new MathContext(
28));
}
}
// the bit manipulations above may change the scale so do it afterwards
// round the scale to the max MS can support
if (destinationDecimal.scale() > 28) {
destinationDecimal = destinationDecimal.setScale(28, roundingModel);
}
if (destinationDecimal.scale() < 0) {
destinationDecimal = destinationDecimal.setScale(0, roundingModel);
}
return destinationDecimal;
}
}
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -