📄 known_client_problems.html.en
字号:
response header starts at offset 256, 257 or 258 of the response. A BrowserMatch for this would match on nearly every hit, so the workaround is enabled automatically on all responses. The workaround implemented detects when this condition would occur in a response and adds extra padding to the header to push the trailing CRLF past offset 258 of the response.</p> </div><div class="top"><a href="#page-header"><img alt="top" src="../images/up.gif" /></a></div><div class="section"><h2><a name="boundary-string" id="boundary-string">Multipart responses and Quoted Boundary Strings</a></h2> <p>On multipart responses some clients will not accept quotes (") around the boundary string. The MIME standard recommends that such quotes be used. But the clients were probably written based on one of the examples in RFC2068, which does not include quotes. Apache does not include quotes on its boundary strings to workaround this problem.</p> </div><div class="top"><a href="#page-header"><img alt="top" src="../images/up.gif" /></a></div><div class="section"><h2><a name="byterange-requests" id="byterange-requests">Byterange Requests</a></h2> <p>A byterange request is used when the client wishes to retrieve a portion of an object, not necessarily the entire object. There was a very old draft which included these byteranges in the URL. Old clients such as Navigator 2.0b1 and MSIE 3.0 for the MAC exhibit this behaviour, and it will appear in the servers' access logs as (failed) attempts to retrieve a URL with a trailing ";xxx-yyy". Apache does not attempt to implement this at all.</p> <p>A subsequent draft of this standard defines a header <code>Request-Range</code>, and a response type <code>multipart/x-byteranges</code>. The HTTP/1.1 standard includes this draft with a few fixes, and it defines the header <code>Range</code> and type <code>multipart/byteranges</code>.</p> <p>Navigator (versions 2 and 3) sends both <code>Range</code> and <code>Request-Range</code> headers (with the same value), but does not accept a <code>multipart/byteranges</code> response. The response must be <code>multipart/x-byteranges</code>. As a workaround, if Apache receives a <code>Request-Range</code> header it considers it "higher priority" than a <code>Range</code> header and in response uses <code>multipart/x-byteranges</code>.</p> <p>The Adobe Acrobat Reader plugin makes extensive use of byteranges and prior to version 3.01 supports only the <code>multipart/x-byterange</code> response. Unfortunately there is no clue that it is the plugin making the request. If the plugin is used with Navigator, the above workaround works fine. But if the plugin is used with MSIE 3 (on Windows) the workaround won't work because MSIE 3 doesn't give the <code>Range-Request</code> clue that Navigator does. To workaround this, Apache special cases "MSIE 3" in the <code>User-Agent</code> and serves <code>multipart/x-byteranges</code>. Note that the necessity for this with MSIE 3 is actually due to the Acrobat plugin, not due to the browser.</p> <p>Netscape Communicator appears to not issue the non-standard <code>Request-Range</code> header. When an Acrobat plugin prior to version 3.01 is used with it, it will not properly understand byteranges. The user must upgrade their Acrobat reader to 3.01.</p> </div><div class="top"><a href="#page-header"><img alt="top" src="../images/up.gif" /></a></div><div class="section"><h2><a name="cookie-merge" id="cookie-merge"><code>Set-Cookie</code> header is unmergeable</a></h2> <p>The HTTP specifications say that it is legal to merge headers with duplicate names into one (separated by commas). Some browsers that support Cookies don't like merged headers and prefer that each <code>Set-Cookie</code> header is sent separately. When parsing the headers returned by a CGI, Apache will explicitly avoid merging any <code>Set-Cookie</code> headers.</p> </div><div class="top"><a href="#page-header"><img alt="top" src="../images/up.gif" /></a></div><div class="section"><h2><a name="gif89-expires" id="gif89-expires"><code>Expires</code> headers and GIF89A animations</a></h2> <p>Navigator versions 2 through 4 will erroneously re-request GIF89A animations on each loop of the animation if the first response included an <code>Expires</code> header. This happens regardless of how far in the future the expiry time is set. There is no workaround supplied with Apache, however there are hacks for <a href="http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/patches/apache-1.2-gif89-expires-hack.patch"> 1.2</a> and for <a href="http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/patches/apache-1.3-gif89-expires-hack.patch"> 1.3</a>.</p> </div><div class="top"><a href="#page-header"><img alt="top" src="../images/up.gif" /></a></div><div class="section"><h2><a name="no-content-length" id="no-content-length"><code>POST</code> without <code>Content-Length</code></a></h2> <p>In certain situations Navigator 3.01 through 3.03 appear to incorrectly issue a POST without the request body. There is no known workaround. It has been fixed in Navigator 3.04, Netscapes provides some <a href="http://help.netscape.com/kb/client/971014-42.html">information</a>. There's also <a href="http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/apache/no-content-length/"> some information</a> about the actual problem.</p> </div><div class="top"><a href="#page-header"><img alt="top" src="../images/up.gif" /></a></div><div class="section"><h2><a name="jdk-12-bugs" id="jdk-12-bugs">JDK 1.2 betas lose parts of responses.</a></h2> <p>The http client in the JDK1.2beta2 and beta3 will throw away the first part of the response body when both the headers and the first part of the body are sent in the same network packet AND keep-alive's are being used. If either condition is not met then it works fine.</p> <p>See also Bug-ID's 4124329 and 4125538 at the java developer connection.</p> <p>If you are seeing this bug yourself, you can add the following BrowserMatch directive to work around it:</p> <div class="example"><p><code> BrowserMatch "Java1\.2beta[23]" nokeepalive </code></p></div> <p>We don't advocate this though since bending over backwards for beta software is usually not a good idea; ideally it gets fixed, new betas or a final release comes out, and no one uses the broken old software anymore. In theory.</p> </div><div class="top"><a href="#page-header"><img alt="top" src="../images/up.gif" /></a></div><div class="section"><h2><a name="content-type-persistent" id="content-type-persistent"><code>Content-Type</code> change is not noticed after reload</a></h2> <p>Navigator (all versions?) will cache the <code>content-type</code> for an object "forever". Using reload or shift-reload will not cause Navigator to notice a <code>content-type</code> change. The only work-around is for the user to flush their caches (memory and disk). By way of an example, some folks may be using an old <code>mime.types</code> file which does not map <code>.htm</code> to <code>text/html</code>, in this case Apache will default to sending <code>text/plain</code>. If the user requests the page and it is served as <code>text/plain</code>. After the admin fixes the server, the user will have to flush their caches before the object will be shown with the correct <code>text/html</code> type.</p> </div><div class="top"><a href="#page-header"><img alt="top" src="../images/up.gif" /></a></div><div class="section"><h2><a name="msie-cookie-y2k" id="msie-cookie-y2k">MSIE Cookie problem with expiry date in the year 2000</a></h2> <p>MSIE versions 3.00 and 3.02 (without the Y2K patch) do not handle cookie expiry dates in the year 2000 properly. Years after 2000 and before 2000 work fine. This is fixed in IE4.01 service pack 1, and in the Y2K patch for IE3.02. Users should avoid using expiry dates in the year 2000.</p> </div><div class="top"><a href="#page-header"><img alt="top" src="../images/up.gif" /></a></div><div class="section"><h2><a name="lynx-negotiate-trans" id="lynx-negotiate-trans">Lynx incorrectly asking for transparent content negotiation</a></h2> <p>The Lynx browser versions 2.7 and 2.8 send a "negotiate: trans" header in their requests, which is an indication the browser supports transparent content negotiation (TCN). However the browser does not support TCN. As of version 1.3.4, Apache supports TCN, and this causes problems with these versions of Lynx. As a workaround future versions of Apache will ignore this header when sent by the Lynx client.</p> </div><div class="top"><a href="#page-header"><img alt="top" src="../images/up.gif" /></a></div><div class="section"><h2><a name="ie40-vary" id="ie40-vary">MSIE 4.0 mishandles Vary response header</a></h2> <p>MSIE 4.0 does not handle a Vary header properly. The Vary header is generated by mod_rewrite in apache 1.3. The result is an error from MSIE saying it cannot download the requested file. There are more details in <a href="http://bugs.apache.org/index/full/4118">PR#4118</a>.</p> <p>A workaround is to add the following to your server's configuration files:</p> <div class="example"><p><code> BrowserMatch "MSIE 4\.0" force-no-vary </code></p></div> <p>(This workaround is only available with releases <strong>after</strong> 1.3.6 of the Apache Web server.)</p> </div></div><div class="bottomlang"><p><span>Available Languages: </span><a href="../en/misc/known_client_problems.html" title="English"> en </a></p></div><div id="footer"><p class="apache">Copyright 2007 The Apache Software Foundation.<br />Licensed under the <a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0">Apache License, Version 2.0</a>.</p><p class="menu"><a href="../mod/">Modules</a> | <a href="../mod/directives.html">Directives</a> | <a href="../faq/">FAQ</a> | <a href="../glossary.html">Glossary</a> | <a href="../sitemap.html">Sitemap</a></p></div></body></html>
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -