📄 log-perd.doc
字号:
Zout is the termination impedance.3.5. FINDING THE CRITICAL PARAMETERS From the currents and voltages just calculated, we can findall the critical parameters of the design. Before we do, it isdesireable to take care of one small point. It is convenient tonormalize all the currents and voltages to 1 Watt of inputpower. This normalization allows us to compare the directivityof this antenna with that of an isotropic antenna driven by anideal source which has the same input power. That is, for theisotropic source there will be no source resistance. To calculatethe scale factor, we first need to know the amount of power acceptedby the antenna. This value was calculated in Section 3.4 as 1 POWERIN = - (Iin) (Iin*) [real(ZinAS) + Rs] 2The scale factor is SCALE = sqrt(WATTS / POWERIN)where WATTS = 1 Watt of input power sqrt() is the square root function. Now we multiply all currents and voltages by the value of SCALE. The gain of an isotropic antenna is given in dB as Gain_Iso = 10.0 * log10(WATTS / (4 * PI * RADIUS**2))where RADIUS is a distance sufficiently far from the antenna to ensure the measurement is in the far-field. Next, the pattern of the antenna is calculated as given inthe book (old eq. 6-52) using the appropriate direction cosinesfor our geometry. The front-to-back ratio is found by examinationof the pattern on boresight and 180 degrees from boresight. Thefront-to-sidelobe level is found by searching for the nextlargest local maximum besides the main beam. It is possiblethat the main beam has split, and the front-to-sidelobe level isnegative (in dB). The program then converts the currents andvoltages to dB at some phase angle in degrees (this is foroutput purposes). Finally, it finds the VSWR by computingthe reflection coefficient, ABS_GAM as | ZinA - ZCin | ABS_GAM = | ----------- | | ZinA + ZCin |where |z| represents the magnitude of the complex argument, z.The VSWR is then 1 + ABS_GAM VSWR = ------------- 1 - ABS_GAMThis is the VSWR in the source transmission line relative to the characteristic impedance of that line.4. SUBTLETIES AND ASSUMPTIONS This section contains a list of assumptions and subtlepoints associated with this design and analysis program. Forfurther comments, please see Section 6., VERIFICATION ANDVALIDATION SUMMARY. The technique used to find the antenna impedance matrix isactually an approximation which [6] calls "significant."Excitation of one element has an effect on another element which in turn has an effect on a third, and so forth. The methodused disregards the secondary effects on the third and subsequent interactions. By applying a unit voltage at element 1, we have normalizedthe source voltage, Vin, located away from element 1 down thesource transmission line, to a value for which we later solve. That is, for the purpose of calculation, we merely assume aninput current of 1 Amp and take care of the scaling later. Notice that this routine can analyze other antenna arraysas well. For instance, proper modification of the transmissionline matrix, YT, and the antenna elements matrix, ZA, allowus to analyze an array of dipoles located arbitrarily in spacewhether or not they are connected. Additional modifications tothe routine which finds the gain allows analysis of elementsother than dipoles. In fact, [6] tells how to extend this program with verylittle modification to include arrays of log-periodic dipolearrays. The excitation matrix, I = [1 0 0 ... 0]T can be used inother useful ways. For instance, changing the excitation matrixto I = [ ... 0 0 0 1]T allows the user to investigate problemsarising from reflections at the termination. I = [1 1 ... 1]Tallows the user to investigate arrays of independently drivendipoles. Of course, the transmission line matrix, YT, must beremoved (or set to 0) if the elements are not connected. The input impedances can be confusing. One could see50 Ohms of input impedance as measured at the source (ZinAS)while the input impedance seen at the shortest element of theantenna is something completely different. Therefore, one mustensure that ALL impedance match for the highest efficiency.That is, ideally Rs = 0, ZinAS = ZinA = Rin. The optimal value of the termination impedance will changewith frequency. If the antenna is radiating from the shortestelements, Zout should equal ZO. If the antenna is radiating fromthe longest elements, then Zout approximately should equal Rin.Since these values are close together, picking Zout = Rin shouldbe sufficient. The gain of this antenna can be increased beyond thatpredicted by Figure 11-13 and [11]. The classic LPDA antenna usesa metal boom as a transmission line. If the antenna transmissionline were allowed to meander slightly between elements, the phase ofthe current could be forced to change precisely (not approximately)by 180 degrees between elements.5. OUTPUT PARAMETERS5.1. DESCRIPTION Many of the output parameters have already been described. All input parameters (and quantities easily derivable, such asAlpha from Sigma and Tau) are also output, so they will not bediscussed here. The output depends on what analysis optionswere chosen. What follows is a list of all available outputs. Voltages and currents at all elements, the source, and the termination. Gain pattern (in dBi) of the E-plane, H-plane, and a custom plane for a single frequency. Swept frequency analysis of the gain, front-to-back ratio, front-to-sidelobe ratio, input impedance, and VSWR. Single frequency analysis of the gain, front-to-back ratio, front-to-sidelobe ratio, input impedance, and VSWR. Characteristic impedance of the antenna transmission line.5.2. OUTPUT FILES Log-Perd.FOR outputs several files depending on the optionschosen during the input portion of the program. These files are Log-Perd.INI An input file which is automatically updated every time the program is executed. If the file does not exist in the current directory, it is created using default values. LP_DES.OUT File containing a design summary. LP_CPL.OUT File containing a design summary and parameters analyzed at a particular frequency and measured in the custom plane. LP_EPL.OUT File containing a design summary and parameters analyzed at a particular frequency and measured in the E-plane. LP_HPL.OUT File containing a design summary and parameters analyzed at a particular frequency and measured in the H-plane. LP_SWEPT.DAT File containing the result of a swept frequency analysis and measured in the E-plane. LP_GAIN.DAT File containing two columns: frequency and gain on boresight (dBi). Suitable for use with the plotting program. LP_FTBR.DAT File containing two columns: frequency and front to back ratio (dB). Suitable for use with the plotting program. LP_SRC.DAT File containing two columns: frequency and magnitude of the input impedance measured at the source looking toward the antenna. Suitable for use with the plotting program. LP_Z_ANT.DAT File containing two columns: frequency and magnitude of the input impedance measured at the input terminals of the antenna (not at the source). Suitable for use with the plotting program. LP_VSWR.DAT File containing two columns: frequency and VSWR measured in the input line. Suitable for use with the plotting program. LP_EPAT.DAT File containing the E-plane gain (dBi) as a function of angle. Suitable for use with the plotting program. LP_HPAT.DAT File containing the H-plane gain (dBi)as a function of angle. Suitable for use with the plotting program. LP_CPAT.DAT File containing the C-plane gain (dBi) as a function of angle. Suitable for use with the plotting program.6. VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION SUMMARY This program has undergone extensive, though notexhaustive, testing to ensure that each module and the totalprogram work as they were intended. However, no rigoroustesting has been performed which ensures that the models areaccurate (validation). Instead, the outputs from this programwere casually compared to previously published results, such asearlier editions of the book [9] and other sources already cited. Furthermore, some hand waving, such as occurs in the descriptionof the program in the book on page 565, allows us to feel good aboutthe accuracy of the program without rigorously proving it.Assumptions include All conductors are lossless. The medium surrounding the antenna has unity relative permittivity and permeability. All parts are perfectly manufactured and connected. In particular, the feed is perfectly balanced. The current distribution on each element is sinusoidal. The antenna transmission line can be spaced precisely and uniformly along its length. The computer has no round-off error, especially with regard to matrix inversion. At the subroutine level, each module was checked withsimple test cases to verify its accuracy. FINDST Tested with sample inputs and compared to Figure 11.13 in the book. Note that the book makes a 1 dB correction to the results originally published[7]. It is known that there is a mistake in this reference, and the amount of error varies from about 0.5 to 2 dB. Therefore, the optimum design as calculated by this program will be slightly in error. This program could be used to find a corrected version of Figure 11.13, to the accuracy of the other error sources and assumptions. This exercise has been done, although with a different program, and the results are published[11]. FINDZ Tested by comparison of the results to identical cases calculated in MathCAD which used the integral equations of 7-29 and 7-39a. As described in Part 4, SUBTLETIES AND ASSUMPTIONS, an approximation is made with regard to removing all elements except two: the excited one and the one under observation. INPUT Tested by direct observation of the results. LUSOLV Tested by sample test matrices[12]. LUDEC Tested by sample test matrices[12]. OUTPUT1 Tested by direct observation of the results. OUTPUT2 Tested by direct observation of the results. PATTERN Tested indirectly by comparison of the analysis results to published results[]. R2POL Tested with sample inputs with the ouput compared to hand calculations. SICI Tested with sample inputs and compared to [13] SLL Tested by direct observation of the results. At the program level, the results were checked againstpreviously published results, against previously writtencode in MathCAD, and against sanity checks.7. FORTRAN Compilation The code contained in Log-Perd.FOR is written for the FORTRAN77 language standard. It was developed on a PC using MicrosoftFORTRAN Power Station for Windows and Windows 95 and has also beensuccessfully compiled on a Sun workstation.8. CREDITS This program and all its subroutines were created byMr. Chris Bishop with the exception of the matrix inversionroutines, LUSOLV and LUDEC, and the sine and cosine integrals,SI and CI. The matrix inversion routines were created byDr. James T. Aberle, and the sine and cosine integrals werecreated by Mr. Anastasis Polycarpou. In both cases the routineswere made for the Telecommunications Research Center at ArizonaState University.BiographyMR. CHRIS BISHOP received his bachelor's and master's degrees inelectrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technologyin 1990 and 1991, respectively. His research focused preciselyon modeling log-periodic dipole arrays. From 1992 through 1995he worked for Phase IV Systems, Inc. testing radar seekers in Hardware-in-the-Loop environments for US Army Missile Command.His chief tasks there included analysis of existing electronics,microwave devices, and radiating elements, as well as specification of a compact antenna range. Currently, Mr. Bishopattends Arizona State University where he pursues the Ph.D. inelectrical engineering.AcknowledgementsMr. Bishop would like to thank Dr. Ed B. Joy of the GeorgiaInstitute of Technology for inspiring him to pursue antennas asan area of research, Dr. Michael D. Fahey for making him realizeengineering is less of a job than it is a way of life, Dr. JamesT. Aberle for allowing him time from his regular duties to writethe code for this application, and Dr. Constantine A. Balanisfor agreeing to include this code in his book.9. REFERENCES[1] V.H. Rumsey, "Frequency Independent Antennas." 1957 IRE National Convention Record, pt 1, pp 114 - 118.[2] D.K. Cheng, FIELD AND WAVE ELECTROMAGNETICS, 2ed, Addison- Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Massachusetts, pp. 449-455, 1989. [3] S. Ramo, J.R. Whinnery, and T. van Duzer, FIELDS AND WAVES IN COMMUNICATION ELECTRONICS, 2ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, p 252, 1984.[4] G. De Vito and G.B. Stracca, "Further Comments on the Design of Log-Periodic Dipole Antennas," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. AP-22, No. 5, pp. 714-718, September 1974.[5] R.C. Jasik and H. Jasik, HANDBOOK OF ANTENNA ENGINEERING, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984.[6] R.H. Kyle, "Mutual Coupling Between Log-Periodic Dipole Antennas," General Electric Tech. Info. Series, Report No. R69ELS-3, Chapter 2, December 1968.[7] R.L. Carrel, "Analysis and Design of the Log-Periodic Dipole Antenna," Ph.D. Dissertation, Elec. Eng. Dept., University of Illinois, 1961, University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan.[8] M.T. Ma, THEORY AND APPLICATION OF ANTENNA ARRAYS, John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chapter 5, 1974.[9] C.A. Balanis, ANTENNA THEORY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982.[10] H.E. King, "Mutual Impedance of Unequal Length Antennas in Echelon," IRE Trans. on Antennas and Propag., AP-5, pp 306-313, July 1957.[11] Y.T. Lo and S.W. Lee, ANTENNA HANDBOOK THEORY, APPLICATIONS, AND DESIGN, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, pp 9-23, 1988.[12] J.R. Westlake, A HANDBOOK OF NUMERICAL MATRIX INVERSION AND SOLUTION OF LINEAR EQUATIONS, John Wiley & Sons, New York, Appendix C, 1968.[13] M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, editors, HANDBOOK OF MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS, ninth printing, Dover Publications, New York, 1970.
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -