⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 changelog.opaque.txt

📁 router source code for the ospdf.
💻 TXT
字号:
----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * -----Changes 2002.12.201. Bug fixes  1.1 When an opaque LSA is being removed from (or added to) the LSDB,      it does not mean a change in network topology. Therefore, SPF      recalculation should not be triggered in that case.      There was an assertion failure problem "assert (rn && rn->info)"      inside the function "ospf_ase_incremental_update()", because      the upper function "ospf_lsa_maxage_walker_remover()" called it      when a type-11 opaque LSA is removed due to MaxAge.  1.2 Type-9 LSA is defined to have "link-local" flooding scope.      In the Database exchange procedure with a new neighbor, a type-9      LSA was added in the database summary of a DD message, even if      the link is different from the one that have bound to.2. Feature enhancements  2.1 Though a "wildcard" concept to handle type-9/10/11 LSAs altogether      has introduced about a year ago, it was only a symbol definition      and actual handling mechanism was not implemented. Now it works.----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * -----Changes 2002.7.81. Bug fixes  1.1 When "ospf_delete_opaque_functab()" is called, internal structure      "oipt" remain unfreed. If register/delete functab is repeated,      illegal memory access happens due to this "oipt".  1.2 In "free_opaque_info_per_id()", there was a crucial typo which      ignores a condition test.      "if (oipi->lsa != NULL);" <-- semicolon!2. Feature enhancements  None.----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * -----Changes 2001.12.031. Bug fixes  1.1 Though a new member "oi" has added to "struct ospf_lsa" to control      flooding scope of type-9 Opaque-LSAs, the value was always NULL      because no one set it.  1.2 In the function "show_ip_ospf_database_summary()" and "show_lsa_      detail_adv_router()", VTY output for type-11 Opaque-LSAs did not      work properly.  1.3 URL for the opaque-type assignment reference has changed.  1.4 In the file "ospf_mpls_te.c", printf formats have changed to      avoid compiler warning messages; "%lu" -> "%u", "%lx" -> "%x".      Note that this hack depends on OS, compiler and their versions.   1.5 One of attached documentation "opaque_lsa.txt" has changed to      reflect the latest coding.2. Feature enhancements  2.1 Knowing that it is an ugly hack, an "officially unallocated"      opaque-type value 0 has newly introduced as a "wildcard",      which matches to all opaque-type.      This value must not be flooded to the network, of course.  2.2 The Opaque-core module makes use of newly introduced hooks to      dispatch every LSDB change (LSA installation and deletion) to      preregistered opaque users.      Therefore, by providing appropriate callback functions as new      parameters of "ospf_register_opaque_functab()", an opaque user      can refer to every LSA instance to be installed into, or to be      deleted from, the LSDB.----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * -----Changes 2001.10.311. Bug fixes  1.1 Since each LSA has their own lifetime, they will remain in a      routing domain (being stored in LSDB of each router), until their      age naturally reach to MaxAge or explicitly being flushed by the      originated router. Therefore, if a router restarted with a short      downtime, it is possible that previously flooded self-originated      LSAs might received if the NSM status is not less than Exchange.      There were some problems in the way of handling self-originated      Opaque-LSAs if they are contained in a received LSUpd message,      but not installed to the local LSDB yet.      Regardless of some conditions to start originating Opaque-LSAs      (there should be at least one opaque-capable full-state neighbor),      the function "ospf_flood()" will be called to flood and install      this brand-new looking LSA.      As the result, when the NSM of an opaque-capable neighbor gets      full, internal state inconsistency happens; a user of Opaque-LSA      such as MPLS-TE can refer to self-originated LSAs in the local      LSDB, but cannot modify their contents...      Above problems have fixed with a policy "flush it from the whole      routing domain and keep silent until the flushing completed".      By using this sweeping technique, we can be free from confusion      caused by self-originated LSAs received via network.   1.2 The function "ospf_opaque_type_name()" contained massive ifdefs      corresponding to each "opaque-type".      These unnecessary ifdefs are removed completely.  1.3 In the function "ospf_delete_opaque_functab()", there was an      improper loop control that causes illegal memory access.      Original coding was "next = nextnode (node)".  1.4 The function "ospf_mpls_te_ism_change()" could not handle the      case when the ISM changes from Waiting to DR/BDR/Other.      So, there was a case that even if one of an ISM become      operational and MPLS-TE module has started, the corresponding      Opaque-LSA cannot be originated.  1.5 The function "ospf_opaque_lsa_reoriginate_schedule()" did not      allow to be called multiple times, simply because handling      module for the given "lsa-type & opaque-type" already exists.      But this assumption seems to be wrong.      Change the policy to allow this function to be called multiple      times and let the caller to decide what should do when the      corresponding callback function "(* functab->lsa_originator)()"      is called.2. Feature enhancements  2.1 The global bitmap "opaque" has introduced instead of former flag      "OpaqueCapable", to store complex conditions to handle Opaque-LSAs.  2.2 The MPLS-TE module now referes to "draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic      -06.txt", no significant changes with 05 version, though.----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * -----Changes 2001.08.031. Bug fixes  1.1 Even if the ospfd started with opaque capability enabled, when      the ospfd receives an unknown opaque-type (unregistered by the      function "ospf_register_opaque_functab()" beforehand), the LSA      was discarded. As the result, only the opaque-LSAs that have      commonly registered by opaque-capable ospf routers can be      flooded in a routing domain.      This behavior has fixed so that arbitrary opaque-type LSAs can      be flooded among opaque-capable ospf routers.      If the ospfd has opaque-LSA capability but disabled at runtime,      received opaque-LSAs can be accepted and registered to LSDB as      is, but not be flooded to the network; those opaque LSAs will      remain in LSDB until explicitly flushed by incoming LSUpd      messages with MaxAge, or their age naturally reaches to MaxAge.  1.2 The function "ospf_register_opaque_functab()" did not check      if the entry corresponding to the given "lsa-type, opaque-type"      combination already exists or not.      This problem has fixed not to allow multiple registration.  1.3 Since type-11 (AS external) LSAs will be flooded beyond areas,      there is little relationship between "struct lsa" and "struct      area". More specifically, the pointer address "lsa->area" can      be NULL if the lsa-type is 11, thus an illegal memory access      will happen. This problem has fixed.  1.4 When self-originated opaque-LSAs are received via network and      if the corresponding opaque-type functions are not available      (they have already deleted) at that time, those LSAs were      dropped due to "unknown opaque-type" error.      After the problem 1.1 has fixed, those "self-originated" LSAs      were registered to LSDB and then flooded to the network, even      if the processing functions did not exist...      After all, this problem has fixed so that those LSAs should      explicitly be flushed from the routing domain immediately, if      the processing functions cannot find at that time.  1.5 Some typo have fixed.      --- EXAMPLE ---      static int      opaque_lsa_originate_callback (list funclist, void *lsa_type_dependent)                                                          ^^^^^      --- EXAMPLE ---2. Feature enhancements  2.1 According to the description of rfc2328 in section 10.8, any      change in the router's optional capabilities should trigger      the option re-negotiation procedures with neighbors.      --- EXCERPT ---                              If for some reason the router's optional        capabilities change, the Database Exchange procedure should be        restarted by reverting to neighbor state ExStart.      --- EXCERPT ---      For the opaque-capability changes, this feature has implemented.      More specifically, if "ospf opaque-lsa" or "no ospf opaque-lsa"      VTY command is given at runtime, all self-originated LSAs will      be flushed immediately and then all neighbor status will be      forced to ExStart by generating SeqNumberMismatch events.  2.1 When we change opaque-capability dynamically (ON -> OFF -> ON),      there was no trigger at "OFF->ON" timing to reactivate opaque      LSA handling modules (such as MPLS-TE) that have once forcibly      stopped at "ON->OFF" timing.      Now this dynamic reactivation feature has added.  2.2 The MPLS-TE module now referes to "draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic      -05.txt", no significant changes with 04 version, though.----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * -----Changes 2001.03.28  Initial release of Opaque-LSA/MPLS-TE extensions for the zebra/ospfd.

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -