📄 locking
字号:
The text below describes the locking rules for VFS-related methods.It is (believed to be) up-to-date. *Please*, if you change anything inprototypes or locking protocols - update this file. And update the relevantinstances in the tree, don't leave that to maintainers of filesystems/devices/etc. At the very least, put the list of dubious cases in the end of this file.Don't turn it into log - maintainers of out-of-the-tree code are supposed tobe able to use diff(1). Thing currently missing here: socket operations. Alexey?--------------------------- dentry_operations --------------------------prototypes: int (*d_revalidate)(struct dentry *, int); int (*d_hash) (struct dentry *, struct qstr *); int (*d_compare) (struct dentry *, struct qstr *, struct qstr *); int (*d_delete)(struct dentry *); void (*d_release)(struct dentry *); void (*d_iput)(struct dentry *, struct inode *); char *(*d_dname)((struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen);locking rules: none have BKL dcache_lock rename_lock ->d_lock may blockd_revalidate: no no no yesd_hash no no no yesd_compare: no yes no no d_delete: yes no yes nod_release: no no no yesd_iput: no no no yesd_dname: no no no no--------------------------- inode_operations --------------------------- prototypes: int (*create) (struct inode *,struct dentry *,int, struct nameidata *); struct dentry * (*lookup) (struct inode *,struct dentry *, struct nameidata *); int (*link) (struct dentry *,struct inode *,struct dentry *); int (*unlink) (struct inode *,struct dentry *); int (*symlink) (struct inode *,struct dentry *,const char *); int (*mkdir) (struct inode *,struct dentry *,int); int (*rmdir) (struct inode *,struct dentry *); int (*mknod) (struct inode *,struct dentry *,int,dev_t); int (*rename) (struct inode *, struct dentry *, struct inode *, struct dentry *); int (*readlink) (struct dentry *, char __user *,int); int (*follow_link) (struct dentry *, struct nameidata *); void (*truncate) (struct inode *); int (*permission) (struct inode *, int, struct nameidata *); int (*setattr) (struct dentry *, struct iattr *); int (*getattr) (struct vfsmount *, struct dentry *, struct kstat *); int (*setxattr) (struct dentry *, const char *,const void *,size_t,int); ssize_t (*getxattr) (struct dentry *, const char *, void *, size_t); ssize_t (*listxattr) (struct dentry *, char *, size_t); int (*removexattr) (struct dentry *, const char *);locking rules: all may block, none have BKL i_mutex(inode)lookup: yescreate: yeslink: yes (both)mknod: yessymlink: yesmkdir: yesunlink: yes (both)rmdir: yes (both) (see below)rename: yes (all) (see below)readlink: nofollow_link: notruncate: yes (see below)setattr: yespermission: nogetattr: nosetxattr: yesgetxattr: nolistxattr: noremovexattr: yes Additionally, ->rmdir(), ->unlink() and ->rename() have ->i_mutex onvictim. cross-directory ->rename() has (per-superblock) ->s_vfs_rename_sem. ->truncate() is never called directly - it's a callback, not amethod. It's called by vmtruncate() - library function normally used by->setattr(). Locking information above applies to that call (i.e. isinherited from ->setattr() - vmtruncate() is used when ATTR_SIZE had beenpassed).See Documentation/filesystems/directory-locking for more detailed discussionof the locking scheme for directory operations.--------------------------- super_operations ---------------------------prototypes: struct inode *(*alloc_inode)(struct super_block *sb); void (*destroy_inode)(struct inode *); void (*read_inode) (struct inode *); void (*dirty_inode) (struct inode *); int (*write_inode) (struct inode *, int); void (*put_inode) (struct inode *); void (*drop_inode) (struct inode *); void (*delete_inode) (struct inode *); void (*put_super) (struct super_block *); void (*write_super) (struct super_block *); int (*sync_fs)(struct super_block *sb, int wait); void (*write_super_lockfs) (struct super_block *); void (*unlockfs) (struct super_block *); int (*statfs) (struct dentry *, struct kstatfs *); int (*remount_fs) (struct super_block *, int *, char *); void (*clear_inode) (struct inode *); void (*umount_begin) (struct super_block *); int (*show_options)(struct seq_file *, struct vfsmount *); ssize_t (*quota_read)(struct super_block *, int, char *, size_t, loff_t); ssize_t (*quota_write)(struct super_block *, int, const char *, size_t, loff_t);locking rules: All may block. BKL s_lock s_umountalloc_inode: no no nodestroy_inode: noread_inode: no (see below)dirty_inode: no (must not sleep)write_inode: noput_inode: nodrop_inode: no !!!inode_lock!!!delete_inode: noput_super: yes yes nowrite_super: no yes readsync_fs: no no readwrite_super_lockfs: ?unlockfs: ?statfs: no no noremount_fs: yes yes maybe (see below)clear_inode: noumount_begin: yes no noshow_options: no (vfsmount->sem)quota_read: no no no (see below)quota_write: no no no (see below)->read_inode() is not a method - it's a callback used in iget().->remount_fs() will have the s_umount lock if it's already mounted.When called from get_sb_single, it does NOT have the s_umount lock.->quota_read() and ->quota_write() functions are both guaranteed tobe the only ones operating on the quota file by the quota code (viadqio_sem) (unless an admin really wants to screw up something andwrites to quota files with quotas on). For other details about lockingsee also dquot_operations section.--------------------------- file_system_type ---------------------------prototypes: int (*get_sb) (struct file_system_type *, int, const char *, void *, struct vfsmount *); void (*kill_sb) (struct super_block *);locking rules: may block BKLget_sb yes yeskill_sb yes yes->get_sb() returns error or 0 with locked superblock attached to the vfsmount(exclusive on ->s_umount).->kill_sb() takes a write-locked superblock, does all shutdown work on it,unlocks and drops the reference.--------------------------- address_space_operations --------------------------prototypes: int (*writepage)(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc); int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *); int (*sync_page)(struct page *); int (*writepages)(struct address_space *, struct writeback_control *); int (*set_page_dirty)(struct page *page); int (*readpages)(struct file *filp, struct address_space *mapping, struct list_head *pages, unsigned nr_pages); int (*prepare_write)(struct file *, struct page *, unsigned, unsigned); int (*commit_write)(struct file *, struct page *, unsigned, unsigned); sector_t (*bmap)(struct address_space *, sector_t); int (*invalidatepage) (struct page *, unsigned long); int (*releasepage) (struct page *, int); int (*direct_IO)(int, struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov, loff_t offset, unsigned long nr_segs); int (*launder_page) (struct page *);locking rules: All except set_page_dirty may block BKL PageLocked(page) i_semwritepage: no yes, unlocks (see below)readpage: no yes, unlockssync_page: no maybewritepages: noset_page_dirty no noreadpages: noprepare_write: no yes yescommit_write: no yes yeswrite_begin: no locks the page yeswrite_end: no yes, unlocks yesperform_write: no n/a yesbmap: yesinvalidatepage: no yesreleasepage: no yesdirect_IO: nolaunder_page: no yes ->prepare_write(), ->commit_write(), ->sync_page() and ->readpage()may be called from the request handler (/dev/loop). ->readpage() unlocks the page, either synchronously or via I/Ocompletion. ->readpages() populates the pagecache with the passed pages and startsI/O against them. They come unlocked upon I/O completion. ->writepage() is used for two purposes: for "memory cleansing" and for"sync". These are quite different operations and the behaviour may differdepending upon the mode.If writepage is called for sync (wbc->sync_mode != WBC_SYNC_NONE) thenit *must* start I/O against the page, even if that would involveblocking on in-progress I/O.If writepage is called for memory cleansing (sync_mode ==WBC_SYNC_NONE) then its role is to get as much writeout underway aspossible. So writepage should try to avoid blocking againstcurrently-in-progress I/O.If the filesystem is not called for "sync" and it determines that itwould need to block against in-progress I/O to be able to start new I/Oagainst the page the filesystem should redirty the page withredirty_page_for_writepage(), then unlock the page and return zero.This may also be done to avoid internal deadlocks, but rarely.If the filesystem is called for sync then it must wait on anyin-progress I/O and then start new I/O.The filesystem should unlock the page synchronously, before returning to thecaller, unless ->writepage() returns special WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATEvalue. WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE means that page cannot really be written outcurrently, and VM should stop calling ->writepage() on this page for sometime. VM does this by moving page to the head of the active list, hence thename.Unless the filesystem is going to redirty_page_for_writepage(), unlock the pageand return zero, writepage *must* run set_page_writeback() against the page,followed by unlocking it. Once set_page_writeback() has been run against thepage, write I/O can be submitted and the write I/O completion handler must runend_page_writeback() once the I/O is complete. If no I/O is submitted, thefilesystem must run end_page_writeback() against the page before returning fromwritepage.That is: after 2.5.12, pages which are under writeout are *not* locked. Note,if the filesystem needs the page to be locked during writeout, that is ok, too,the page is allowed to be unlocked at any point in time between the calls toset_page_writeback() and end_page_writeback().Note, failure to run either redirty_page_for_writepage() or the combination ofset_page_writeback()/end_page_writeback() on a page submitted to writepagewill leave the page itself marked clean but it will be tagged as dirty in theradix tree. This incoherency can lead to all sorts of hard-to-debug problemsin the filesystem like having dirty inodes at umount and losing written data. ->sync_page() locking rules are not well-defined - usually it is calledwith lock on page, but that is not guaranteed. Considering the currentlyexisting instances of this method ->sync_page() itself doesn't lookwell-defined... ->writepages() is used for periodic writeback and for syscall-initiatedsync operations. The address_space should start I/O against at least*nr_to_write pages. *nr_to_write must be decremented for each page which iswritten. The address_space implementation may write more (or less) pagesthan *nr_to_write asks for, but it should try to be reasonably close. Ifnr_to_write is NULL, all dirty pages must be written.writepages should _only_ write pages which are present onmapping->io_pages. ->set_page_dirty() is called from various places in the kernelwhen the target page is marked as needing writeback. It may be called
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -