📄 rfc2976.txt
字号:
Route R o
Server r o
Subject R o
Timestamp g o
To gc(1) m
Unsupported 420 o
User-Agent g o
Via gc(2) m
Warning r o
WWW-Authenticate 401 o
Table 2 Summary of header fields, P-Z
Bodies which imply a change in the SIP call state or the sessions
initiated by SIP MUST NOT be sent in an INFO message.
Other request failure (4xx), Server Failure (5xx) and Global
Failure (6xx) responses MAY be sent for the INFO Request.
2.3 Message Body Inclusion
The INFO request MAY contain a message body.
Donovan Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 2976 SIP INFO Method October 2000
2.4 Behavior of SIP User Agents
Unless stated otherwise, the protocol rules for the INFO request
governing the usage of tags, Route and Record-Route,
retransmission and reliability, CSeq incrementing and message
formatting follow those in [1] as defined for the BYE request.
An INFO request MAY be cancelled. A UAS receiving a CANCEL for an
INFO request SHOULD respond to the INFO with a "487 Request
Cancelled" response if a final response has not been sent to the
INFO and then behave as if the request were never received.
However, the INFO message MUST NOT change the state of the SIP
call, or the sessions initiated by SIP.
2.5 Behavior of SIP Proxy and Redirect Servers
2.5.1 Proxy Server
Unless stated otherwise, the protocol rules for the INFO
request at a proxy are identical to those for a BYE request as
specified in [1].
2.5.2 Forking Proxy Server
Unless stated otherwise, the protocol rules for the INFO
request at a proxy are identical to those for a BYE request as
specified in [1].
2.5.3 Redirection Server
Unless stated otherwise, the protocol rules for the INFO
request at a proxy are identical to those for a BYE request as
specified in [1].
3. INFO Message Bodies
The purpose of the INFO message is to carry mid-session information
between SIP user agents. This information will generally be carried
in message bodies, although it can be carried in headers in the INFO
message.
The definition of the message bodies or any new headers created for
the INFO method is outside the scope of this document. It is
expected that separate documents will be created to address
definition of these entities.
Donovan Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 2976 SIP INFO Method October 2000
In addition, the INFO method does not define additional mechanisms
for ensuring in-order delivery. While the CSeq header will be
incremented upon the transmission of new INFO messages, this should
not be used to determine the sequence of INFO information. This is
due to the fact that there could be gaps in the INFO message CSeq
count caused by a user agent sending re-INVITES or other SIP
messages.
4. Guidelines for extensions making use of INFO
The following are considerations that should be taken into account
when defining SIP extensions that make use of the INFO method.
- Consideration should be taken on the size of message bodies to be
carried by INFO messages. The message bodies should be kept small
due to the potential for the message to be carried over UDP and the
potential for fragmentation of larger messages.
- There is potential that INFO messages could be forked by a SIP
Proxy Server. The implications of this forking of the information
in the INFO message need to be taken into account.
- The use of multi-part message bodies may be helpful when defining
the message bodies to be carried by the INFO message.
- The extensions that use the INFO message MUST NOT rely on the
INFO message to do anything that effects the SIP call state or the
state of related sessions.
- The INFO extension defined in this document does not depend on
the use of the Require or Proxy-Require headers. Extensions using
the INFO message may need the use of these mechanisms. However,
the use of Require and Proxy-Require should be avoided, if
possible, in order to improve interoperability between SIP
entities.
5. Security Considerations
If the contents of the message body are private then end-to-end
encryption of the message body can be used to prevent unauthorized
access to the content.
There are no other security issues specific to the INFO method.
The security requirements specified in the SIP specification apply
to the INFO method.
Donovan Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 2976 SIP INFO Method October 2000
6. References
[1] Handley, M., Schulzrinne, H., Schooler, E. and J. Rosenberg,
"SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 2543, March 1999.
7. Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Matthew Cannon for his contributions
to this document. In addition, the author would like to thank the
members of the MMUSIC and SIP working groups, especially Jonathan
Rosenberg, for comments and suggestions on how to improve the
document.
8. Author's Address
Steve Donovan
dynamicsoft
5100 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 200
Plano, Texas 75024
Email: sdonovan@dynamicsoft.com
Donovan Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 2976 SIP INFO Method October 2000
9. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Donovan Standards Track [Page 9]
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -