⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 sem.c

📁 嵌入式系统设计与实例开发实验教材二源码 多线程应用程序设计 串行端口程序设计 AD接口实验 CAN总线通信实验 GPS通信实验 Linux内核移植与编译实验 IC卡读写实验 SD驱动使
💻 C
📖 第 1 页 / 共 2 页
字号:
/* * linux/ipc/sem.c * Copyright (C) 1992 Krishna Balasubramanian * Copyright (C) 1995 Eric Schenk, Bruno Haible * * IMPLEMENTATION NOTES ON CODE REWRITE (Eric Schenk, January 1995): * This code underwent a massive rewrite in order to solve some problems * with the original code. In particular the original code failed to * wake up processes that were waiting for semval to go to 0 if the * value went to 0 and was then incremented rapidly enough. In solving * this problem I have also modified the implementation so that it * processes pending operations in a FIFO manner, thus give a guarantee * that processes waiting for a lock on the semaphore won't starve * unless another locking process fails to unlock. * In addition the following two changes in behavior have been introduced: * - The original implementation of semop returned the value *   last semaphore element examined on success. This does not *   match the manual page specifications, and effectively *   allows the user to read the semaphore even if they do not *   have read permissions. The implementation now returns 0 *   on success as stated in the manual page. * - There is some confusion over whether the set of undo adjustments *   to be performed at exit should be done in an atomic manner. *   That is, if we are attempting to decrement the semval should we queue *   up and wait until we can do so legally? *   The original implementation attempted to do this. *   The current implementation does not do so. This is because I don't *   think it is the right thing (TM) to do, and because I couldn't *   see a clean way to get the old behavior with the new design. *   The POSIX standard and SVID should be consulted to determine *   what behavior is mandated. * * Further notes on refinement (Christoph Rohland, December 1998): * - The POSIX standard says, that the undo adjustments simply should *   redo. So the current implementation is o.K. * - The previous code had two flaws: *   1) It actively gave the semaphore to the next waiting process *      sleeping on the semaphore. Since this process did not have the *      cpu this led to many unnecessary context switches and bad *      performance. Now we only check which process should be able to *      get the semaphore and if this process wants to reduce some *      semaphore value we simply wake it up without doing the *      operation. So it has to try to get it later. Thus e.g. the *      running process may reacquire the semaphore during the current *      time slice. If it only waits for zero or increases the semaphore, *      we do the operation in advance and wake it up. *   2) It did not wake up all zero waiting processes. We try to do *      better but only get the semops right which only wait for zero or *      increase. If there are decrement operations in the operations *      array we do the same as before. * * /proc/sysvipc/sem support (c) 1999 Dragos Acostachioaie <dragos@iname.com> * * SMP-threaded, sysctl's added * (c) 1999 Manfred Spraul <manfreds@colorfullife.com> * Enforced range limit on SEM_UNDO * (c) 2001 Red Hat Inc <alan@redhat.com> */#include <linux/config.h>#include <linux/slab.h>#include <linux/spinlock.h>#include <linux/init.h>#include <linux/proc_fs.h>#include <asm/uaccess.h>#include "util.h"#define sem_lock(id)	((struct sem_array*)ipc_lock(&sem_ids,id))#define sem_unlock(id)	ipc_unlock(&sem_ids,id)#define sem_rmid(id)	((struct sem_array*)ipc_rmid(&sem_ids,id))#define sem_checkid(sma, semid)	\	ipc_checkid(&sem_ids,&sma->sem_perm,semid)#define sem_buildid(id, seq) \	ipc_buildid(&sem_ids, id, seq)static struct ipc_ids sem_ids;static int newary (key_t, int, int);static void freeary (int id);#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FSstatic int sysvipc_sem_read_proc(char *buffer, char **start, off_t offset, int length, int *eof, void *data);#endif#define SEMMSL_FAST	256 /* 512 bytes on stack */#define SEMOPM_FAST	64  /* ~ 372 bytes on stack *//* * linked list protection: *	sem_undo.id_next, *	sem_array.sem_pending{,last}, *	sem_array.sem_undo: sem_lock() for read/write *	sem_undo.proc_next: only "current" is allowed to read/write that field. *	 */int sem_ctls[4] = {SEMMSL, SEMMNS, SEMOPM, SEMMNI};#define sc_semmsl	(sem_ctls[0])#define sc_semmns	(sem_ctls[1])#define sc_semopm	(sem_ctls[2])#define sc_semmni	(sem_ctls[3])static int used_sems;void __init sem_init (void){	used_sems = 0;	ipc_init_ids(&sem_ids,sc_semmni);#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS	create_proc_read_entry("sysvipc/sem", 0, 0, sysvipc_sem_read_proc, NULL);#endif}static int newary (key_t key, int nsems, int semflg){	int id;	struct sem_array *sma;	int size;	if (!nsems)		return -EINVAL;	if (used_sems + nsems > sc_semmns)		return -ENOSPC;	size = sizeof (*sma) + nsems * sizeof (struct sem);	sma = (struct sem_array *) ipc_alloc(size);	if (!sma) {		return -ENOMEM;	}	memset (sma, 0, size);	id = ipc_addid(&sem_ids, &sma->sem_perm, sc_semmni);	if(id == -1) {		ipc_free(sma, size);		return -ENOSPC;	}	used_sems += nsems;	sma->sem_perm.mode = (semflg & S_IRWXUGO);	sma->sem_perm.key = key;	sma->sem_base = (struct sem *) &sma[1];	/* sma->sem_pending = NULL; */	sma->sem_pending_last = &sma->sem_pending;	/* sma->undo = NULL; */	sma->sem_nsems = nsems;	sma->sem_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;	sem_unlock(id);	return sem_buildid(id, sma->sem_perm.seq);}asmlinkage long sys_semget (key_t key, int nsems, int semflg){	int id, err = -EINVAL;	struct sem_array *sma;	if (nsems < 0 || nsems > sc_semmsl)		return -EINVAL;	down(&sem_ids.sem);		if (key == IPC_PRIVATE) {		err = newary(key, nsems, semflg);	} else if ((id = ipc_findkey(&sem_ids, key)) == -1) {  /* key not used */		if (!(semflg & IPC_CREAT))			err = -ENOENT;		else			err = newary(key, nsems, semflg);	} else if (semflg & IPC_CREAT && semflg & IPC_EXCL) {		err = -EEXIST;	} else {		sma = sem_lock(id);		if(sma==NULL)			BUG();		if (nsems > sma->sem_nsems)			err = -EINVAL;		else if (ipcperms(&sma->sem_perm, semflg))			err = -EACCES;		else			err = sem_buildid(id, sma->sem_perm.seq);		sem_unlock(id);	}	up(&sem_ids.sem);	return err;}/* doesn't acquire the sem_lock on error! */static int sem_revalidate(int semid, struct sem_array* sma, int nsems, short flg){	struct sem_array* smanew;	smanew = sem_lock(semid);	if(smanew==NULL)		return -EIDRM;	if(smanew != sma || sem_checkid(sma,semid) || sma->sem_nsems != nsems) {		sem_unlock(semid);		return -EIDRM;	}	if (ipcperms(&sma->sem_perm, flg)) {		sem_unlock(semid);		return -EACCES;	}	return 0;}/* Manage the doubly linked list sma->sem_pending as a FIFO: * insert new queue elements at the tail sma->sem_pending_last. */static inline void append_to_queue (struct sem_array * sma,				    struct sem_queue * q){	*(q->prev = sma->sem_pending_last) = q;	*(sma->sem_pending_last = &q->next) = NULL;}static inline void prepend_to_queue (struct sem_array * sma,				     struct sem_queue * q){	q->next = sma->sem_pending;	*(q->prev = &sma->sem_pending) = q;	if (q->next)		q->next->prev = &q->next;	else /* sma->sem_pending_last == &sma->sem_pending */		sma->sem_pending_last = &q->next;}static inline void remove_from_queue (struct sem_array * sma,				      struct sem_queue * q){	*(q->prev) = q->next;	if (q->next)		q->next->prev = q->prev;	else /* sma->sem_pending_last == &q->next */		sma->sem_pending_last = q->prev;	q->prev = NULL; /* mark as removed */}/* * Determine whether a sequence of semaphore operations would succeed * all at once. Return 0 if yes, 1 if need to sleep, else return error code. */static int try_atomic_semop (struct sem_array * sma, struct sembuf * sops,			     int nsops, struct sem_undo *un, int pid,			     int do_undo){	int result, sem_op;	struct sembuf *sop;	struct sem * curr;	for (sop = sops; sop < sops + nsops; sop++) {		curr = sma->sem_base + sop->sem_num;		sem_op = sop->sem_op;		if (!sem_op && curr->semval)			goto would_block;		curr->sempid = (curr->sempid << 16) | pid;		curr->semval += sem_op;		if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO)		{			int undo = un->semadj[sop->sem_num] - sem_op;			/*	 		 *	Exceeding the undo range is an error.			 */			if (undo < (-SEMAEM - 1) || undo > SEMAEM)			{				/* Don't undo the undo */				sop->sem_flg &= ~SEM_UNDO;				goto out_of_range;			}			un->semadj[sop->sem_num] = undo;		}		if (curr->semval < 0)			goto would_block;		if (curr->semval > SEMVMX)			goto out_of_range;	}	if (do_undo)	{		sop--;		result = 0;		goto undo;	}	sma->sem_otime = CURRENT_TIME;	return 0;out_of_range:	result = -ERANGE;	goto undo;would_block:	if (sop->sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT)		result = -EAGAIN;	else		result = 1;undo:	while (sop >= sops) {		curr = sma->sem_base + sop->sem_num;		curr->semval -= sop->sem_op;		curr->sempid >>= 16;		if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO)			un->semadj[sop->sem_num] += sop->sem_op;		sop--;	}	return result;}/* Go through the pending queue for the indicated semaphore * looking for tasks that can be completed. */static void update_queue (struct sem_array * sma){	int error;	struct sem_queue * q;	for (q = sma->sem_pending; q; q = q->next) {					if (q->status == 1)			continue;	/* this one was woken up before */		error = try_atomic_semop(sma, q->sops, q->nsops,					 q->undo, q->pid, q->alter);		/* Does q->sleeper still need to sleep? */		if (error <= 0) {				/* Found one, wake it up */			wake_up_process(q->sleeper);			if (error == 0 && q->alter) {				/* if q-> alter let it self try */				q->status = 1;				return;			}			q->status = error;			remove_from_queue(sma,q);		}	}}/* The following counts are associated to each semaphore: *   semncnt        number of tasks waiting on semval being nonzero *   semzcnt        number of tasks waiting on semval being zero * This model assumes that a task waits on exactly one semaphore. * Since semaphore operations are to be performed atomically, tasks actually * wait on a whole sequence of semaphores simultaneously. * The counts we return here are a rough approximation, but still * warrant that semncnt+semzcnt>0 if the task is on the pending queue. */static int count_semncnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum){	int semncnt;	struct sem_queue * q;	semncnt = 0;	for (q = sma->sem_pending; q; q = q->next) {		struct sembuf * sops = q->sops;		int nsops = q->nsops;		int i;		for (i = 0; i < nsops; i++)			if (sops[i].sem_num == semnum			    && (sops[i].sem_op < 0)			    && !(sops[i].sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT))				semncnt++;	}	return semncnt;}static int count_semzcnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum){	int semzcnt;	struct sem_queue * q;	semzcnt = 0;	for (q = sma->sem_pending; q; q = q->next) {		struct sembuf * sops = q->sops;		int nsops = q->nsops;		int i;		for (i = 0; i < nsops; i++)			if (sops[i].sem_num == semnum			    && (sops[i].sem_op == 0)			    && !(sops[i].sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT))				semzcnt++;	}	return semzcnt;}/* Free a semaphore set. */static void freeary (int id){	struct sem_array *sma;	struct sem_undo *un;	struct sem_queue *q;	int size;	sma = sem_rmid(id);	/* Invalidate the existing undo structures for this semaphore set.	 * (They will be freed without any further action in sem_exit()	 * or during the next semop.)	 */	for (un = sma->undo; un; un = un->id_next)		un->semid = -1;	/* Wake up all pending processes and let them fail with EIDRM. */	for (q = sma->sem_pending; q; q = q->next) {		q->status = -EIDRM;		q->prev = NULL;		wake_up_process(q->sleeper); /* doesn't sleep */	}	sem_unlock(id);	used_sems -= sma->sem_nsems;	size = sizeof (*sma) + sma->sem_nsems * sizeof (struct sem);	ipc_free(sma, size);}static unsigned long copy_semid_to_user(void *buf, struct semid64_ds *in, int version){	switch(version) {	case IPC_64:		return copy_to_user(buf, in, sizeof(*in));	case IPC_OLD:	    {		struct semid_ds out;		ipc64_perm_to_ipc_perm(&in->sem_perm, &out.sem_perm);		out.sem_otime	= in->sem_otime;		out.sem_ctime	= in->sem_ctime;		out.sem_nsems	= in->sem_nsems;		return copy_to_user(buf, &out, sizeof(out));	    }	default:		return -EINVAL;	}}int semctl_nolock(int semid, int semnum, int cmd, int version, union semun arg){	int err = -EINVAL;	switch(cmd) {	case IPC_INFO:	case SEM_INFO:	{		struct seminfo seminfo;		int max_id;		memset(&seminfo,0,sizeof(seminfo));		seminfo.semmni = sc_semmni;		seminfo.semmns = sc_semmns;		seminfo.semmsl = sc_semmsl;		seminfo.semopm = sc_semopm;		seminfo.semvmx = SEMVMX;		seminfo.semmnu = SEMMNU;		seminfo.semmap = SEMMAP;		seminfo.semume = SEMUME;		down(&sem_ids.sem);		if (cmd == SEM_INFO) {			seminfo.semusz = sem_ids.in_use;			seminfo.semaem = used_sems;		} else {			seminfo.semusz = SEMUSZ;			seminfo.semaem = SEMAEM;		}		max_id = sem_ids.max_id;		up(&sem_ids.sem);		if (copy_to_user (arg.__buf, &seminfo, sizeof(struct seminfo))) 			return -EFAULT;		return (max_id < 0) ? 0: max_id;	}	case SEM_STAT:	{		struct sem_array *sma;		struct semid64_ds tbuf;		int id;		if(semid >= sem_ids.size)			return -EINVAL;		memset(&tbuf,0,sizeof(tbuf));		sma = sem_lock(semid);		if(sma == NULL)			return -EINVAL;		err = -EACCES;		if (ipcperms (&sma->sem_perm, S_IRUGO))			goto out_unlock;		id = sem_buildid(semid, sma->sem_perm.seq);		kernel_to_ipc64_perm(&sma->sem_perm, &tbuf.sem_perm);		tbuf.sem_otime  = sma->sem_otime;		tbuf.sem_ctime  = sma->sem_ctime;		tbuf.sem_nsems  = sma->sem_nsems;		sem_unlock(semid);		if (copy_semid_to_user (arg.buf, &tbuf, version))			return -EFAULT;		return id;	}	default:		return -EINVAL;	}	return err;out_unlock:	sem_unlock(semid);	return err;}int semctl_main(int semid, int semnum, int cmd, int version, union semun arg){	struct sem_array *sma;	struct sem* curr;	int err;	ushort fast_sem_io[SEMMSL_FAST];	ushort* sem_io = fast_sem_io;	int nsems;	sma = sem_lock(semid);	if(sma==NULL)		return -EINVAL;	nsems = sma->sem_nsems;	err=-EIDRM;	if (sem_checkid(sma,semid))		goto out_unlock;	err = -EACCES;	if (ipcperms (&sma->sem_perm, (cmd==SETVAL||cmd==SETALL)?S_IWUGO:S_IRUGO))		goto out_unlock;	switch (cmd) {	case GETALL:	{		ushort *array = arg.array;		int i;		if(nsems > SEMMSL_FAST) {			sem_unlock(semid);						sem_io = ipc_alloc(sizeof(ushort)*nsems);			if(sem_io == NULL)				return -ENOMEM;			err = sem_revalidate(semid, sma, nsems, S_IRUGO);			if(err)				goto out_free;		}

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -