dmalloc_tab_loc.h

测试内存泄露工具

/*
 * Local defines for the memory table.
 *
 * Copyright 2000 by Gray Watson
 *
 * This file is part of the dmalloc package.
 *
 * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for
 * any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided that the
 * above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all
 * copies, and that the name of Gray Watson not be used in advertising
 * or publicity pertaining to distribution of the document or software
 * without specific, written prior permission.
 *
 * Gray Watson makes no representations about the suitability of the
 * software described herein for any purpose.  It is provided "as is"
 * without express or implied warranty.
 *
 * The author may be contacted via http://dmalloc.com/
 *
 * $Id: dmalloc_tab_loc.h,v 1.9 2003/06/08 05:53:52 gray Exp $
 */

#ifndef __DMALLOC_TAB_LOC_H__
#define __DMALLOC_TAB_LOC_H__

#include "conf.h"

/*
 * Maximum number of splits.  This should mean that these routines can
 * handle at least 2^128 different values (that's _quite_ a few).  And
 * then you can always increase the value.
 */
#define MAX_QSORT_SPLITS	128

/*
 * Maximum number of entries that must be in list for it to be
 * partitioned.  If there are fewer elements then just do our
 * insertion sort.
 */
#define MAX_QSORT_PARTITION	8

/* comparison function */
typedef int	(*compare_t)(const void *element1_p, const void *element2_p);

/*
 * void HASH_MIX
 *
 * DESCRIPTION:
 *
 * Mix 3 32-bit values reversibly.  For every delta with one or two
 * bits set, and the deltas of all three high bits or all three low
 * bits, whether the original value of a,b,c is almost all zero or is
 * uniformly distributed.
 *
 * If HASH_MIX() is run forward or backward, at least 32 bits in a,b,c
 * have at least 1/4 probability of changing.  If mix() is run
 * forward, every bit of c will change between 1/3 and 2/3 of the
 * time.  (Well, 22/100 and 78/100 for some 2-bit deltas.)
 *
 * HASH_MIX() takes 36 machine instructions, but only 18 cycles on a
 * superscalar machine (like a Pentium or a Sparc).  No faster mixer
 * seems to work, that's the result of my brute-force search.  There
 * were about 2^68 hashes to choose from.  I only tested about a
 * billion of those.
 */
#define HASH_MIX(a, b, c) \
 do { \
   a -= b; a -= c; a ^= (c >> 13); \
   b -= c; b -= a; b ^= (a << 8); \
   c -= a; c -= b; c ^= (b >> 13); \
   a -= b; a -= c; a ^= (c >> 12); \
   b -= c; b -= a; b ^= (a << 16); \
   c -= a; c -= b; c ^= (b >> 5); \
   a -= b; a -= c; a ^= (c >> 3); \
   b -= c; b -= a; b ^= (a << 10); \
   c -= a; c -= b; c ^= (b >> 15); \
 } while(0)

#endif /* ! __DMALLOC_TAB_LOC_H__ */