rfc-compliance

非常好的dns解析软件

Copyright (C) 2004  Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
Copyright (C) 2001  Internet Software Consortium.
See COPYRIGHT in the source root or http://isc.org/copyright.html for terms.

$Id: rfc-compliance,v 1.4 2004/03/05 05:04:53 marka Exp $

BIND 9 is striving for strict compliance with IETF standards.  We
believe this release of BIND 9 complies with the following RFCs, with
the caveats and exceptions listed in the numbered notes below.  Note
that a number of these RFCs do not have the status of Internet
standards but are proposed or draft standards, experimental RFCs, 
or Best Current Practice (BCP) documents.

  RFC1034
  RFC1035 [1] [2]
  RFC1123
  RFC1183
  RFC1535
  RFC1536
  RFC1706
  RFC1712
  RFC1750
  RFC1876
  RFC1982
  RFC1995
  RFC1996
  RFC2136
  RFC2163
  RFC2181
  RFC2230
  RFC2308
  RFC2535 [3] [4]
  RFC2536
  RFC2537
  RFC2538
  RFC2539
  RFC2671
  RFC2672
  RFC2673
  RFC2782
  RFC2915
  RFC2930
  RFC2931 [5]
  RFC3007


[1] Queries to zones that have failed to load return SERVFAIL rather
than a non-authoritative response.  This is considered a feature.

[2] CLASS ANY queries are not supported.  This is considered a feature.

[3] Wildcard records are not supported in DNSSEC secure zones.

[4] Servers authoritative for secure zones being resolved by BIND 9
must support EDNS0 (RFC2671), and must return all relevant SIGs and
NXTs in responses rather than relying on the resolving server to
perform separate queries for missing SIGs and NXTs.

[5] When receiving a query signed with a SIG(0), the server will only
be able to verify the signature if it has the key in its local
authoritative data; it will not do recursion or validation to
retrieve unknown keys.