📄 sh-spec.patch
字号:
See http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11902Part of fix for abort on line assert (info[DT_RPATH] == NULL);in glibc-2.3.2's ld.so, which makes all dynamically-linkedprograms crash.Message-Id: <200308020452.h724q0n01509@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp>To: dank@kegel.comCc: kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jpSubject: Re: Writing PIC version of __udivsi3_i4?In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Aug 2003 21:15:27 -0700" <3F2B3ADF.6030206@kegel.com>References: <3F2B3ADF.6030206@kegel.com>Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 13:58:05 +0900From: kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:> It seems it might be from gcc's spec file:> > *subtarget_link_spec:> %{shared:-shared} %{!static: %{rdynamic:-export-dynamic} %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2} %{!rpath:-rpath /lib}} %{static:-static}> > as the only place -rpath showed up was in the output of gcc -v as it> was linking libc.so.> > Well, that's a clue, anyway! Guess I'll dig through the spec files> tomorrow to see if I can figure it out some more.I've grepped gcc/config/*/*.h and found only SH and old libc1 stuffsof i386/alpha include %{!rpath:-rpath ... in 3.3 release and thecurrent CVS. And my sh-gcc's specs doesn't have this :-(It would be the Right Thing to remove this stuff simply. How aboutthe gcc patch below?Regards, kaz----- gcc-3.3/gcc/config/sh/linux.h.orig Sat Aug 2 13:20:57 2003+++ gcc-3.3/gcc/config/sh/linux.h Sat Aug 2 13:22:42 2003@@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ do { \ "%{shared:-shared} \ %{!static: \ %{rdynamic:-export-dynamic} \- %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2} \- %{!rpath:-rpath /lib}} \+ %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2}} \ %{static:-static}" /* The GNU C++ standard library requires that these macros be defined. */
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -