⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 velestuser.ektext

📁 这是一个不错的源码
💻 EKTEXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 4 页
字号:
least three different initial velocity models for any model geometry (layer thickness): one with extremly low crustal velocities, one with extremly high and one with intermediate crustal velocities.After many VELEST runs with different initial model parameters (layer thickness and velocities), hypocentral parameters, and various control parameters you will get a feeling of how parts of the RMS misfit function (Fig. 2b) for your problem-data set look like. You will also see if the problem is reasonably well determined by the data. You may then decide on the best model layering based on the results of the previous VELEST runs and based on the depth distribution of the earthquakes. Choose a simple model by combining layers where velocities are very similar, unless you want to mimic a gradient. Note: Topmost layers are mostly subvertically and bottom layers are mostly subhorizontally penetrated. Therefore, the resolution in these layers is generally lower than in the central layers that contain the hypocenters.APPROACHING A MINIMUMIf one finds a local minimum RMS region one would hope that the velocity model part of the solution is similar to the situation in Fig. 4, where the final velocity models (B1 and B2) within the well-resolved depth range are almost identical for different initial models (A1 and A2). If the near-surface velocities and the Moho depth are well-known one could increase the damping for these layers in the model file (*.mod).Note: Fix the Moho depth by increased damping of the sub-Moho velocities only, do not overdamp both layer velocities below and above the Moho.Once a local minimum in the RMS-function (Fig. 2b) has been found one may want to check for low velocity layers (LVL's). For reason of apriori information or else one might want to allow LVL's only at certain depth ranges or one might want to fix some layer velocities obtained by earlier VELEST runs. The additional damping parameter for each layer provided by the input velocity model file allows to have variable layer velocity damping. Note: Do not fix (overdamp) near-surface layer velocities and also overdamp station delays unless a Minimum 1-D model with corresponding station delays has been reached.     Figure 4.	Final velocity models (B1 and B2) resulting from two identical inversion procedures of same data with two different initial velocity models (A1 and A2).In many cases it is advantageous to calculate two runs with fewer iterations each than one VELEST run with double the number of iterations since in the first case one may select among the output files (velocity model, station delays, earthquake locations) data for use as input in the second run. TESTING A MINIMUM 1D MODELThere are numerous tests that may be performed and some might already have been performed during the previous VELEST runs. Here I just list a few possiblities.USING SHOTS and QUARY BLASTSBecause these sources normally lay at or near the Earth's surface raypaths for shots and blasts travel twice (at either end) through the near-surface structure. Thus shots and blasts are much harder to locate by a well-distributed seismic array (Kissling 1988). We take advantage of this and of the known source parameters by using shot and blast data to estimate absolute location errors (Kissling 1988, Kradolfer 1989). When performing this test, however, shot data should NOT be treated differently from earthquake data in routine location procedure where the Minimum 1D model with the station corrections is fixed (INVERTRATIO=ITTMAX+1) or at least heavily damped (VTHET=STATHET=999.)Note: Normally, shot and quarry blast data should NOT be used to derive a Minimum 1D model other than providing information for the model layering (from refraction type experiments) for two reasons. First, (as noted above) the errors resulting from near-surface heterogeneity are larger for shots than for earthquakes. Second, the test described above is only valid if the tested model is independent of the test data.Shots recorded along a seismic refraction line are excellent to densely sample the wave field in a specific direction and to derive a model of the underlying structure. The station distribution of such an experiment, however, rate among the worst possible ways to deploy a seismic station array for earthquake location. Obviously, data from such different experiments should not be mixed and treated in a similar way by a trial-and-error process that involves many inversions. Rather, these data should both be used in different ways that exploit their strengths, as suggested above.COMPARING INITIAL and FINAL HYPOCENTERSWhen dealing with a large (>200) data set of well-locatable earthquakes (gap<<180; nobs>10) one might want to check for a bias in the velocity model and station corrections as a result of systematic (though possibly small) shift of the hypocenters.Use the Minimum 1D model with station corrections as initial model parameters and apply damping of VTHET=1., STATHET=0.1, XYTHET= ZTHET=OTHET=0.01 with ITTMAX=9 and INVERTRATIO=2. To obtain initial hypocenters you write a short routine that shifts all hypocenters randomly (!) by 5 km or 10 km (avoid "air quakes") from the locations obtained with the Minimum 1D model. If the Minimum 1D model with stations corrections denotes a very robust minimum, the results of this test should be a small or negligable variation in the Minimum 1D model and station corrections while the hypocenters should be more or less relocated back to their original (correct) positions. Hypocenters that remain in the wrong locations need to be checked individually. If the final model and/or station corrections obtained in this test deviate significantly from the Minimum 1D model, the solution space has not been sampled completely and the search for another (or better) Minimum 1D model must continue.COMPARING MINIMUM 1-D MODEL and STATION DELAYS with CRUSTAL STRUCTUREIn the Minimum 1D model, the layer velocities will approximately equal the average velocity of the 3D structure within the same depth range that has been sampled by the data. Note that it is not the spatial average of all the area under study. Rather, the velocities of the 1D model approach the average of the 3D structure in each layer weighted by the total ray length.The station delays are the average values for the azimuthally and radially varying time delays at these stations relative to the near-surface velocities of the Minimum 1D model. In teleseismic studies, the main data signal to be interpreted and inverted is the distribution of travel times delays at seismic stations with respect to the azimuth of the incoming wave fronts. With local earthquake data the azimuthal and radial dependences are never as uniform for all stations as for the teleseismic data if the hypocenters are well distributed over the area.5.  Overview of Input/Output files5.1  INPUT-FILESContent:	default nameVELEST-control-file	VELEST.CMN ,Model-file	INTIAL.MOD ,Station-file (coords,elev,etc.)	LIST.STA ,Earthquake data (hypocenters and travel times)	PHASEDATA.CNV                                              or (in SED-format)	PHASEDATA.SED                                        or (in archive-format)	DATA.ARCVELshot data (optional)	SHOTS.CNV (for single_event_mode:)Region names (Swiss & Flinn-Engdahl)	REGIONSNAMEN.DATRegion coordinates (Swiss & Flinn-Engdahl)	REGIONSKOORD.DATSeismo-file (for Magnitude-calculation; optional)	SEISMO.PARAM5.2  OUTPUT-FILESContent:	default namemain print-output 	VELEST.OUTfinal hypocenters and travel times	VELOUT.CNV    (may be used as input for another iteration)new station list with new sta. corrections	VELOUT.STA    (may be used as input for another iteration) (in single_event_mode:)'HYPO71'-compatible output of the locations	VELOUT.ARCVEL    (print-output in single_event_mode)Optional Output:file011 - summary cards of final hypocenters (for plotting)	VELOUT.SMPfile013 - raypoints of all the rays	VELOUT.RAYfile021 - partial derivatives of all the rays	VELOUT.DRVfile075 - coordinates and ALE of all located events	VELOUT.ALEfile076 - coordinates and DSPR of all located events	VELOUT.DSPRfile077 - coordinates and residual of reflected ray 	VELOUT.RFLfile078 - coordinates and residual of refracted ray	VELOUT.RFRfile079 - residual and according distance	VELOUT.RES6.  Overview of content of INPUT files6.1  Explanation of Control Parameters (file VELEST.CMN)This input file contains the control-parameters only, model- and station-parameters are read in from seperate files (their names are specified in the control-file). All parameters are read in free format.OLAT, OLON, ROTATE:Latitude and Longitude (in degrees) or center of cartesian coordinate system and of short distance conversion. ROTATE denotes the angle of clockwise rotated y-axis from North.ICOORDSYSTEM:	Default value: 0= 0	for short distance conversion to cartesian coordi-nate system all over the Earth with positive values representing Longitude West= 1	for short distance conversion to cartesian coordi-nate system all over the Earth with positive values representing Longitude East (CAUTION: this option has not yet been fully tested!)=2	for Swiss coordinate systemLatitudes and Longitudes are used throughout the program (and its input/output) in decimal-degrees. In all the I/O the decimal degrees are characterized with N(orth), S(outh), E(ast) and W(est), respectively. Internally, the program handles latitude North positive and South negative, longitude West positive and longitude East negative. Cartesian coordinates are used in a right-hand system: positive X towards West, positive Y towards North and positive Z towards the center of the Earth. The exception are Swiss data when Swiss-coordinates are used with the center of projection being the city of Berne (x=600.,y=200), positive X-axis towards East, the positive Y-axis towards North, and Z downwards.ZSHIFT:	Default value: 0.0ZSHIFT is used to systematically shift all hypocenters in depth relative to the depth given in their summary cards (see Fig. 5). This option has been added because some routine location programs (HYPO71 and others) do not account for station elevation and, therefore, the hypocentral depth is calculated with respect to the average station elevation and not relative to sea level. Normal usage of VELEST accounts for station elevations with zero elevation in the model refering to mean sea level. [Example: If the earthquakes have been located with HYPO71 and a station network of average station elevation of 900m while you now want to run VELEST while using station elevations, you would put ZSHIFT=0.9].    Figure 5. Purpose of switches zshift and iuselev.ITRIAL, ZTRIAL:	Default values: 0 ,  0.0Controling the trial hypocenter in the single_event_mode.itrial=0	use hypocenter coordinates provided by 	summary card.        =1	trial hypocenter equals station coordinates of 	earliest observation and ztrial for depth.ISED:	Default value: 0Controling the input format of the earthquake data.=0	in converted (*.CNV) archive format=1	VELEST archive type format=2	SED format (SED= Swiss Seismological Service)If program VELEST should read in other than one of the above formats, the user may add an additional subroutine, which reads the desired format. Any subroutine of this kind should always read the phase data of one entire event. The call of the routine may look as follows:call INPUTxyz(iunit,nobsread,sta,iyr(i),imo(i),iday(i),ihr(i),imin(i),sec,rmk1,rmk2,cphase,ipwt,amx,prx,xlat,alon,emag(i),depth,e(1,i),i1,ifixsolution,i3,eventtype)NEQ:	number of earthquakesNSHOT:	number of shots or blastsISINGLE:	Default value: 0Switch controling mode of VELEST.=0	simultaneous mode=1	single_event_modeIRESOLCALC:	Default value: 0Resolution matrix calculation in single_event_mode.DMAX:	Default value: 200.0Maximal epicentral distance for use of phase. Observations at stations at greater distances are neglected.

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -