📄 j_glmadmiss.hlp
字号:
{smcl}
{* 04mar2005}{...}
{title:My glm output reports that some mean estimates are inadmissible}
{pstd}
Your estimation results show that your parameter estimates produce
inadmissible mean predictions for one or more observations in your estimation
sample. As a result, you should exercise caution in interpreting these
parameter estimates.
{pstd}
If you obtained this warning, then you have attempted to fit a binomial
model with either log or identity link.
{pstd}
If you fit a binomial model with log link either via {helpb glm} or
{helpb binreg} with option {cmd:rr} for risk ratios, then the warning arose
because the linear predictor ({it:eta} in glm jargon) is greater than zero for
one or more observations. For this model, the estimated probability of a
positive event is the exponentiated linear predictor. When the linear
predictor is greater than zero, the estimated probability is greater than one,
which is inadmissible.
{pstd}
If you fit a binomial model with identity link either via {helpb glm} or
{helpb binreg} with option {cmd:rd} for risk differences, then the warning
arose because the linear predictor is outside the range [0,1] for one
or more observations. As such, the predicted probability of a positive
event (which is just the linear predictor in this case) is outside its
admissible range for these observations.
{pstd}
Most likely your model was fit via ML and the estimation algorithm did not
converge. Even if the algorithm did converge, the interpretation of the
resulting parameter estimates is questionable.
{title:Also see}
{psee}
Manual:
{bf:[R] glm},{break}
{bf:[R] binreg}
{psee}
Online: {helpb glm}, {helpb binreg}
{p_end}
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -