📄 wireless nirvana.htm
字号:
<P class=medium-normal>Unlike Ethernet <STRONG><EM>network</EM></STRONG>
nodes, which can monitor <STRONG><EM>network</EM></STRONG> activity
directly and instantly detect collisions, cellular
<STRONG><EM>networks'</EM></STRONG> mobile terminals listen to and
communicate only with the base station, not with one another. This
increases latency relative to wireline <STRONG><EM>networks</EM></STRONG>
as the <STRONG><EM>network</EM></STRONG> must coordinate all
communications. For packet communications, the mechanism to transmit data
packets occurs in two stages. First, the mobile terminal uses a control
channel to request a traffic channel. The control channel is a
random-access channel and collisions can occur from other terminals, in
which case the terminal must repeat the request. The
<STRONG><EM>network</EM></STRONG> responds by assigning a traffic channel
(specified time slots in the case of GPRS and a specified code in the case
of 1XRTT) for data transmission. The complexity of managing radio access
results in wireless-<STRONG><EM>network</EM></STRONG> latencies higher
than those of a wireline <STRONG><EM>network</EM></STRONG>. Round-trip
times of .5 seconds to 1.5 seconds are typical. Latency can slow down some
applications more than throughput, especially if the application shuttles
a lot of messages. Delays also can restrict what applications are
feasible. Some applications, such as packetized voice, are highly
sensitive to delay. On the other hand, streaming applications that are not
interactive should not have a latency problem.</P>
<P class=medium-normal>With both GPRS and 1XRTT, the
<STRONG><EM>network</EM></STRONG> separates packet data from circuit data
at the base-station controller and connects it to a separate packet
infrastructure. The core packet nodes in GPRS are SGSN (Serving GPRS
Support Node), which tracks user locations, and GGSN (Gateway GPRS Support
Node), which handles IP-address management and gateways to external
<STRONG><EM>networks</EM></STRONG>, such as the Internet. In the case of
1XRTT, the core packet node is PDSN (Packet Data Serving Node); it
performs much of the same functions the SGSN and GGSN do. This internal
architecture is of little consequence to users, other than the fact that
server-side connections are via packet networks, and not telephone
<STRONG><EM>networks</EM></STRONG>.</P><A name=AN0007584743-5>
<CENTER>
<H3><A id=hd_toc title="IP Packet Architecture "
href="http://web11.epnet.com/citation.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+55725B2C%2D1A6E%2D4291%2D99B0%2DA6A8441EF92B%40sessionmgr6+dbs+a3h+cp+1+F22C&_us=frn+1+hd+False+hs+True+cst+0%3B2+or+Date+fh+False+ss+SO+sm+ES+sl+0+dstb+ES+mh+1+ri+KAAACBTB00061445+22DE&_uso=tg%5B2+%2D+tg%5B1+%2DAB+tg%5B0+%2DAB+db%5B0+%2Da3h+hd+False+clv%5B0+%2DY+op%5B2+%2DAnd+op%5B1+%2DAnd+op%5B0+%2D+cli%5B0+%2DFT+st%5B2+%2D+st%5B1+%2Dcdma+st%5B0+%2Dnetwork++security+mdb%5B0+%2Dimh+DD39&cf=1&fn=1&rn=1#toc">IP
Packet Architecture </A></H3></CENTER>
<P class=medium-normal>To control data sessions, modem vendors (or
operators) provide a software utility that reports connection status and
handles management. When the user invokes a data session, the
<STRONG><EM>network</EM></STRONG> dynamically assigns an IP address to a
mobile terminal-by the GGSN in GPRS and by the PDSN in 1XRTT. From a usage
point of view, the cellular <STRONG><EM>network</EM></STRONG> looks like
an ISP, with IP packets routing to and from the mobile user. Like an ISP,
the operator may also provide an e-mail address but is less likely to
provide other services such as Web hosting.</P>
<P class=medium-normal>GPRS and 1XRTT are steps in an evolution of
capability. The next step for GPRS will be EDGE (Enhanced Data Rates for
GSM Evolution), a radio upgrade that promises to triple throughputs. EDGE
retains the same core infrastructure and uses the same spectrum and same
time-division approach, but adds sophisticated radio mechanisms to alter
modulation and error correction dynamically based on the instantaneous
radio environment, thus increasing spectral efficiency and user
throughputs. EDGE <STRONG><EM>networks</EM></STRONG> will become available
in 2003, with nearly all North American carriers committed to that
technology's deployment. Beyond that, GSM carriers will deploy wideband
<STRONG><EM>CDMA</EM></STRONG> (WCDMA)-also referred to as UMTS (Universal
Mobile Telecommunications System)-a version of
<STRONG><EM>CDMA</EM></STRONG> different from
<STRONG><EM>CDMA</EM></STRONG>2000 that initially will boost peak data
throughputs to 2 Mbps. That throughput eventually will jump to 10 Mbps,
with a technology called High Speed Downlink Packet Access.</P>
<P class=medium-normal>For <STRONG><EM>CDMA</EM></STRONG>2000, the
evolution path includes a technology called 1XEVDO (1X Evolution Data
Only), which boasts peak throughputs of 2.4 Mbps and 1XEVDV (1X Evolution
Data and Voice), which will have peak downlink speeds of 5 Mbps.</P>
<P class=medium-normal>Keep in mind these factors when you consider the
future of wireless data:</P>
<P class=medium-normal><STRONG>• Peak speeds are not the same as average
speeds. </STRONG>For instance, though WCDMA tops out at 2 Mbps, this
represents the total cell capacity; typical users will likely get 200 Kbps
to 300 Kbps throughput on a loaded <STRONG><EM>network</EM></STRONG>.</P>
<P class=medium-normal></P>
<P class=medium-normal><STRONG>• These deployments will take time.
</STRONG>Though EDGE, essentially a
<STRONG><EM>network</EM></STRONG>-software upgrade, is almost here, WCDMA
and 1XEV deployments could take several years. These technologies will be
more expensive and complicated and will require a new radio-access
<STRONG><EM>network</EM></STRONG>.</P>
<P class=medium-normal></P>
<P class=medium-normal><STRONG>• Business plans for 3G
<STRONG><EM>networks</EM></STRONG> are up in the air, </STRONG>with demand
for wireless data services uncertain and the rapid deployment of public
WLANs possibly channeling user-data subscriptions away from cellular
<STRONG><EM>networks</EM></STRONG>. Following the overall telecom
meltdown, many operators are delaying their 3G deployment plans.</P>
<P class=medium-normal></P>
<P class=medium-normal><STRONG>• Spectrum is an issue. </STRONG>Operators
can deploy EDGE and <STRONG><EM>CDMA</EM></STRONG>2000 easily in existing
spectrum, but WCDMA uses 5-MHz radio channels-it's not called wideband for
nothing. Finding room for these channels won't be easy. Most countries in
Europe and Asia have auctioned new 3G spectrum for 3G service. The United
States is a little further behind, having just recently identified which
bands might be feasible.</P>
<P class=medium-normal>Meantime, GPRS and 1XRTT are real. Which is the
better service? 1XRTT has a throughput advantage for the moment, but GPRS
is available in more countries. And the upgrade to EDGE should more than
match 1XRTT, though users will need new equipment to take advantage of the
service. From all other perspectives, the offerings are largely
equivalent. The table on page 78, "Wireless Technology Time Line,"
compares capabilities and deployments of the different cellular
technologies.</P><A name=AN0007584743-6>
<CENTER>
<H3><A id=hd_toc title="Using the Networks "
href="http://web11.epnet.com/citation.asp?tb=1&_ug=sid+55725B2C%2D1A6E%2D4291%2D99B0%2DA6A8441EF92B%40sessionmgr6+dbs+a3h+cp+1+F22C&_us=frn+1+hd+False+hs+True+cst+0%3B2+or+Date+fh+False+ss+SO+sm+ES+sl+0+dstb+ES+mh+1+ri+KAAACBTB00061445+22DE&_uso=tg%5B2+%2D+tg%5B1+%2DAB+tg%5B0+%2DAB+db%5B0+%2Da3h+hd+False+clv%5B0+%2DY+op%5B2+%2DAnd+op%5B1+%2DAnd+op%5B0+%2D+cli%5B0+%2DFT+st%5B2+%2D+st%5B1+%2Dcdma+st%5B0+%2Dnetwork++security+mdb%5B0+%2Dimh+DD39&cf=1&fn=1&rn=1#toc">Using
the Networks </A></H3></CENTER>
<P class=medium-normal>Getting started with these
<STRONG><EM>networks</EM></STRONG> is easy, but getting full satisfaction
requires attention to detail. Establishing connections is straightforward,
IP-based applications work immediately, and you can almost instantly
realize the convenience of anywhere, anytime communications. But you must
consider where service is available, which platforms to use, performance
variations, <STRONG><EM>security</EM></STRONG>, usage costs and networking
idiosyncrasies. Fortunately, these are manageable once you understand
them.</P>
<P class=medium-normal>Service availability is the best place to start
because if you don't have service, the rest of the points are moot. All
the operators are planning nationwide service, and if you can get voice
service, you will be able to have higher-speed data service, a significant
improvement over <STRONG><EM>networks</EM></STRONG> such as CDPD, in which
service coverage does not match the voice footprint. But this won't happen
overnight. T-Mobile offers GPRS everywhere it offers GSM voice service,
but AT&T Wireless and Cingular Wireless use TIA/EIA-136 TDMA
technology for their voice <STRONG><EM>networks</EM></STRONG> and are
rolling out new GSM/GPRS <STRONG><EM>networks</EM></STRONG>. AT&T
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -