⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc1962.txt

📁 改文件中包含了三个协议
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 2 页
字号:
      been received for a previous request.  For retransmissions, the      Identifier MAY remain unchanged.      On reception, the Identifier field of the Reset-Request is copied      into the Identifier field of the Reset-Ack packet.   Data      The Data field is zero or more octets and contains uninterpreted      data for use by the sender.  The data may consist of any binary      value and may be of any length from zero to the peer's established      MRU minus four.4.  CCP Configuration Options   CCP Configuration Options allow negotiation of compression algorithms   and their parameters.  CCP uses the same Configuration Option format   defined for LCP [1], with a separate set of Options.   Configuration Options, in this protocol, indicate algorithms that the   receiver is willing or able to use to decompress data sent by the   sender.  As a result, it is to be expected that systems will offer to   accept several algorithms, and negotiate a single one that will be   used.Rand                        Standards Track                     [Page 5]RFC 1962                    PPP Compression                    June 1996   There is the possibility of not being able to agree on a compression   algorithm.  In that case, no compression will be used, and the link   will continue to operate without compression.  If link reliability   has been separately negotiated, then it will continue to be used,   until the LCP is re-negotiated.   We expect that many vendors will want to use proprietary compression   algorithms, and have made a mechanism available to negotiate these   without encumbering the Internet Assigned Number Authority with   proprietary number requests.   The LCP option negotiation techniques are used.  If an option is   unrecognized, a Configure-Reject MUST be sent.  If all protocols the   sender implements are Configure-Rejected by the receiver, then no   compression is enabled in that direction of the link.   If an option is recognized, but not acceptable due to values in the   request (or optional parameters not in the request), a Configure-NAK   MUST be sent with the option modified appropriately.  The Configure-   NAK MUST contain only those options that will be acceptable.  A new   Configure-Request SHOULD be sent with only the single preferred   option, adjusted as specified in the Configure-Nak.   Up-to-date values of the CCP Option Type field are specified in the   most recent "Assigned Numbers" RFC [2].  Current values are assigned   as follows:      CCP Option      Compression type      0               OUI      1               Predictor type 1      2               Predictor type 2      3               Puddle Jumper      4-15            unassigned      16              Hewlett-Packard PPC      17              Stac Electronics LZS      18              Microsoft PPC      19              Gandalf FZA      20              V.42bis compression      21              BSD LZW Compress      255             Reserved      The unassigned values 4-15 are intended to be assigned to other      freely available compression algorithms that have no license fees.Rand                        Standards Track                     [Page 6]RFC 1962                    PPP Compression                    June 19964.1.  Proprietary Compression OUI   Description      This Configuration Option provides a way to negotiate the use of a      proprietary compression protocol.      Since the first matching compression will be used, it is      recommended that any known OUI compression options be transmitted      first, before the common options are used.      Before accepting this option, the implementation must verify that      the Organization Unique Identifier identifies a proprietary      algorithm that the implementation can decompress, and that any      vendor specific negotiation values are fully understood.   A summary of the Proprietary Compression OUI Configuration Option   format is shown below.  The fields are transmitted from left to   right.    0                   1                   2                   3    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |     Type      |    Length     |       OUI ...   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+         OUI       |    Subtype    |  Values...   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-   Type      0   Length      >= 6   IEEE OUI      The vendor's IEEE Organization Unique Identifier (OUI), which is      the most significant three octets of an Ethernet Physical Address,      assigned to the vendor by IEEE 802.  This identifies the option as      being proprietary to the indicated vendor.  The bits within the      octet are in canonical order, and the most significant octet is      transmitted first.Rand                        Standards Track                     [Page 7]RFC 1962                    PPP Compression                    June 1996   Subtype      This field is specific to each OUI, and indicates a compression      type for that OUI.  There is no standardization for this field.      Each OUI implements its own values.   Values      This field is zero or more octets, and contains additional data as      determined by the vendor's compression protocol.4.2.  Other Compression Types   Description      These Configuration Options provide a way to negotiate the use of      a publicly defined compression algorithm.  Many compression      algorithms are specified.  No particular compression technique has      arisen as an Internet Standard.      These protocols will be made available to all interested parties,      but may have certain licensing restrictions associated with them.      For additional information, refer to the compression protocol      documents that define each of the compression types.   A summary of the Compression Type Configuration Option format is   shown below.  The fields are transmitted from left to right.    0                   1                   2                   3    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |     Type      |    Length     |  Values...   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-   Type      1 to 254   Length      >= 2   Values      This field is zero or more octets, and contains additional data as      determined by the compression protocol.Rand                        Standards Track                     [Page 8]RFC 1962                    PPP Compression                    June 1996Security Considerations   Security issues are not discussed in this memo.References   [1]   Simpson, W., Editor, "The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)", STD         51, RFC 1661, July 1994.   [2]   Reynolds, J., and Postel, J., "Assigned Numbers", STD 2, RFC         1700, USC/Information Sciences Institute, October 1994.   [3]   Rand, D., "PPP Reliable Transmission", RFC 1663, July 1994.Acknowledgments   Bill Simpson helped with the document formatting.Chair's Address   The working group can be contacted via the current chair:      Karl Fox      Ascend Communications      3518 Riverside Drive, Suite 101      Columbus, Ohio 43221      EMail: karl@ascend.comAuthor's Address   Questions about this memo can also be directed to:      Dave Rand      Novell, Inc.      2180 Fortune Drive      San Jose, CA  95131      +1 408 321-1259      EMail: dlr@daver.bungi.comRand                        Standards Track                     [Page 9]

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -