📄 178
字号:
Received: from mail.eecis.udel.edu by whimsy.udel.edu id aa00619; 4 Mar 1998 11:46 ESTReceived: (from juha@localhost) by samuraj.c3l.tyreso.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA22304; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 17:45:52 +0100Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 17:45:52 +0100From: Juha Sarlin <juha@c3l.tyreso.se>Message-Id: <199803041645.RAA22304@samuraj.c3l.tyreso.se>To: mills@huey.udel.eduCC: ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de, stenn@whimsy.udel.eduIn-reply-to: <199803041017.aa03200@huey.udel.edu> (message from Dave Mills on Wed, 4 Mar 1998 10:17:11 EST)Subject: Re: loopfilter time constantMime-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Mills <mills@huey.udel.edu> writes:> The intent of the original MAXTC in the reference kernel implementation> documented in kernel.tar is to vary over he range 0-6 corresponding> to a poll interval range 2^4 through 2^10.It hasn't been like that since xntp3-5.90. Perhaps it should bechanged back? Like this:*** xntp3-5.92a/xntpd/ntp_loopfilter.c.orig Tue Mar 3 08:02:47 1998--- xntp3-5.92a/xntpd/ntp_loopfilter.c Wed Mar 4 17:44:20 1998****************** 205,207 **** interval = 1;! time_constant = min(peer->ppoll, sys_poll) - 2; clock_adjust = 0;--- 205,207 ---- interval = 1;! time_constant = min(peer->ppoll, sys_poll) - 4; clock_adjust = 0;****************** 311,313 **** ntv.maxerror = ntv.esterror + (sys_rootdelay << 2);! ntv.constant = min(peer->ppoll, sys_poll) - 2; ntv.status = STA_PLL;--- 311,313 ---- ntv.maxerror = ntv.esterror + (sys_rootdelay << 2);! ntv.constant = min(peer->ppoll, sys_poll) - 4; ntv.status = STA_PLL;****************** 690,692 **** ntv.status = STA_PLL | STA_UNSYNC;! ntv.constant = sys_poll - 2; #ifdef SIGSYS--- 690,692 ---- ntv.status = STA_PLL | STA_UNSYNC;! ntv.constant = sys_poll - 4; #ifdef SIGSYS
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -