📄 perlfaq8.pod
字号:
You'll have to catch the SIGCHLD signal, and possibly SIGPIPE too.SIGCHLD is sent when the backgrounded process finishes. SIGPIPE issent when you write to a filehandle whose child process has closed (anuntrapped SIGPIPE can cause your program to silently die). This isnot an issue with C<system("cmd&")>.=item ZombiesYou have to be prepared to "reap" the child process when it finishes $SIG{CHLD} = sub { wait };See L<perlipc/"Signals"> for other examples of code to do this.Zombies are not an issue with C<system("prog &")>.=back=head2 How do I trap control characters/signals?You don't actually "trap" a control character. Instead, that charactergenerates a signal which is sent to your terminal's currentlyforegrounded process group, which you then trap in your process.Signals are documented in L<perlipc/"Signals"> and thesection on ``Signals'' in the Camel.Be warned that very few C libraries are re-entrant. Therefore, if youattempt to print() in a handler that got invoked during another stdiooperation your internal structures will likely be in aninconsistent state, and your program will dump core. You cansometimes avoid this by using syswrite() instead of print().Unless you're exceedingly careful, the only safe things to do inside asignal handler are (1) set a variable and (2) exit. In the first case,you should only set a variable in such a way that malloc() is notcalled (eg, by setting a variable that already has a value).For example: $Interrupted = 0; # to ensure it has a value $SIG{INT} = sub { $Interrupted++; syswrite(STDERR, "ouch\n", 5); }However, because syscalls restart by default, you'll find that ifyou're in a "slow" call, such as <FH>, read(), connect(), orwait(), that the only way to terminate them is by "longjumping" out;that is, by raising an exception. See the time-out handler for ablocking flock() in L<perlipc/"Signals"> or the section on ``Signals''in the Camel book.=head2 How do I modify the shadow password file on a Unix system?If perl was installed correctly and your shadow library was writtenproperly, the getpw*() functions described in L<perlfunc> should intheory provide (read-only) access to entries in the shadow passwordfile. To change the file, make a new shadow password file (the formatvaries from system to system--see L<passwd(5)> for specifics) and usepwd_mkdb(8) to install it (see L<pwd_mkdb(8)> for more details).=head2 How do I set the time and date?Assuming you're running under sufficient permissions, you should beable to set the system-wide date and time by running the date(1)program. (There is no way to set the time and date on a per-processbasis.) This mechanism will work for Unix, MS-DOS, Windows, and NT;the VMS equivalent is C<set time>.However, if all you want to do is change your timezone, you canprobably get away with setting an environment variable: $ENV{TZ} = "MST7MDT"; # unixish $ENV{'SYS$TIMEZONE_DIFFERENTIAL'}="-5" # vms system "trn comp.lang.perl.misc";=head2 How can I sleep() or alarm() for under a second?If you want finer granularity than the 1 second that the sleep()function provides, the easiest way is to use the select() function asdocumented in L<perlfunc/"select">. Try the Time::HiRes andthe BSD::Itimer modules (available from CPAN).=head2 How can I measure time under a second?In general, you may not be able to. The Time::HiRes module (availablefrom CPAN) provides this functionality for some systems.If your system supports both the syscall() function in Perl as well asa system call like gettimeofday(2), then you may be able to dosomething like this: require 'sys/syscall.ph'; $TIMEVAL_T = "LL"; $done = $start = pack($TIMEVAL_T, ()); syscall(&SYS_gettimeofday, $start, 0) != -1 or die "gettimeofday: $!"; ########################## # DO YOUR OPERATION HERE # ########################## syscall( &SYS_gettimeofday, $done, 0) != -1 or die "gettimeofday: $!"; @start = unpack($TIMEVAL_T, $start); @done = unpack($TIMEVAL_T, $done); # fix microseconds for ($done[1], $start[1]) { $_ /= 1_000_000 } $delta_time = sprintf "%.4f", ($done[0] + $done[1] ) - ($start[0] + $start[1] );=head2 How can I do an atexit() or setjmp()/longjmp()? (Exception handling)Release 5 of Perl added the END block, which can be used to simulateatexit(). Each package's END block is called when the program orthread ends (see L<perlmod> manpage for more details). For example, you can use this to make sure your filter programmanaged to finish its output without filling up the disk: END { close(STDOUT) || die "stdout close failed: $!"; } The END block isn't called when untrapped signals kill the program,though, so if you use END blocks you should also use use sigtrap qw(die normal-signals);Perl's exception-handling mechanism is its eval() operator. You canuse eval() as setjmp and die() as longjmp. For details of this, seethe section on signals, especially the time-out handler for a blockingflock() in L<perlipc/"Signals"> or the section on ``Signals'' inthe Camel Book.If exception handling is all you're interested in, try theexceptions.pl library (part of the standard perl distribution).If you want the atexit() syntax (and an rmexit() as well), try theAtExit module available from CPAN.=head2 Why doesn't my sockets program work under System V (Solaris)? What does the error message "Protocol not supported" mean?Some Sys-V based systems, notably Solaris 2.X, redefined some of thestandard socket constants. Since these were constant across allarchitectures, they were often hardwired into perl code. The properway to deal with this is to "use Socket" to get the correct values.Note that even though SunOS and Solaris are binary compatible, thesevalues are different. Go figure.=head2 How can I call my system's unique C functions from Perl?In most cases, you write an external module to do it--see the answerto "Where can I learn about linking C with Perl? [h2xs, xsubpp]".However, if the function is a system call, and your system supportssyscall(), you can use the syscall function (documented inL<perlfunc>).Remember to check the modules that came with your distribution, andCPAN as well--someone may already have written a module to do it.=head2 Where do I get the include files to do ioctl() or syscall()?Historically, these would be generated by the h2ph tool, part of thestandard perl distribution. This program converts cpp(1) directivesin C header files to files containing subroutine definitions, like&SYS_getitimer, which you can use as arguments to your functions.It doesn't work perfectly, but it usually gets most of the job done.Simple files like F<errno.h>, F<syscall.h>, and F<socket.h> were fine,but the hard ones like F<ioctl.h> nearly always need to hand-edited.Here's how to install the *.ph files: 1. become super-user 2. cd /usr/include 3. h2ph *.h */*.hIf your system supports dynamic loading, for reasons of portability andsanity you probably ought to use h2xs (also part of the standard perldistribution). This tool converts C header files to Perl extensions.See L<perlxstut> for how to get started with h2xs.If your system doesn't support dynamic loading, you still probablyought to use h2xs. See L<perlxstut> and L<ExtUtils::MakeMaker> formore information (in brief, just use B<make perl> instead of a plainB<make> to rebuild perl with a new static extension).=head2 Why do setuid perl scripts complain about kernel problems?Some operating systems have bugs in the kernel that make setuidscripts inherently insecure. Perl gives you a number of options(described in L<perlsec>) to work around such systems.=head2 How can I open a pipe both to and from a command?The IPC::Open2 module (part of the standard perl distribution) is aneasy-to-use approach that internally uses pipe(), fork(), and exec() to dothe job. Make sure you read the deadlock warnings in its documentation,though (see L<IPC::Open2>). See L<perlipc/"Bidirectional Communication with Another Process"> and L<perlipc/"Bidirectional Communication with Yourself">You may also use the IPC::Open3 module (part of the standard perldistribution), but be warned that it has a different order ofarguments from IPC::Open2 (see L<IPC::Open3>).=head2 Why can't I get the output of a command with system()?You're confusing the purpose of system() and backticks (``). system()runs a command and returns exit status information (as a 16 bit value:the low 7 bits are the signal the process died from, if any, andthe high 8 bits are the actual exit value). Backticks (``) run acommand and return what it sent to STDOUT. $exit_status = system("mail-users"); $output_string = `ls`;=head2 How can I capture STDERR from an external command?There are three basic ways of running external commands: system $cmd; # using system() $output = `$cmd`; # using backticks (``) open (PIPE, "cmd |"); # using open()With system(), both STDOUT and STDERR will go the same place as thescript's STDOUT and STDERR, unless the system() command redirects them.Backticks and open() read B<only> the STDOUT of your command.With any of these, you can change file descriptors before the call: open(STDOUT, ">logfile"); system("ls");or you can use Bourne shell file-descriptor redirection: $output = `$cmd 2>some_file`; open (PIPE, "cmd 2>some_file |");You can also use file-descriptor redirection to make STDERR aduplicate of STDOUT: $output = `$cmd 2>&1`; open (PIPE, "cmd 2>&1 |");Note that you I<cannot> simply open STDERR to be a dup of STDOUTin your Perl program and avoid calling the shell to do the redirection.This doesn't work: open(STDERR, ">&STDOUT"); $alloutput = `cmd args`; # stderr still escapesThis fails because the open() makes STDERR go to where STDOUT wasgoing at the time of the open(). The backticks then make STDOUT go toa string, but don't change STDERR (which still goes to the oldSTDOUT).Note that you I<must> use Bourne shell (sh(1)) redirection syntax inbackticks, not csh(1)! Details on why Perl's system() and backtickand pipe opens all use the Bourne shell are inhttp://www.perl.com/CPAN/doc/FMTEYEWTK/versus/csh.whynot .To capture a command's STDERR and STDOUT together: $output = `cmd 2>&1`; # either with backticks $pid = open(PH, "cmd 2>&1 |"); # or with an open pipe while (<PH>) { } # plus a readTo capture a command's STDOUT but discard its STDERR: $output = `cmd 2>/dev/null`; # either with backticks $pid = open(PH, "cmd 2>/dev/null |"); # or with an open pipe while (<PH>) { } # plus a readTo capture a command's STDERR but discard its STDOUT: $output = `cmd 2>&1 1>/dev/null`; # either with backticks $pid = open(PH, "cmd 2>&1 1>/dev/null |"); # or with an open pipe while (<PH>) { } # plus a readTo exchange a command's STDOUT and STDERR in order to capture the STDERRbut leave its STDOUT to come out our old STDERR: $output = `cmd 3>&1 1>&2 2>&3 3>&-`; # either with backticks $pid = open(PH, "cmd 3>&1 1>&2 2>&3 3>&-|");# or with an open pipe while (<PH>) { } # plus a readTo read both a command's STDOUT and its STDERR separately, it's easiestand safest to redirect them separately to files, and then read from thosefiles when the program is done: system("program args 1>/tmp/program.stdout 2>/tmp/program.stderr");Ordering is important in all these examples. That's because the shellprocesses file descriptor redirections in strictly left to right order. system("prog args 1>tmpfile 2>&1"); system("prog args 2>&1 1>tmpfile");The first command sends both standard out and standard error to thetemporary file. The second command sends only the old standard outputthere, and the old standard error shows up on the old standard out.=head2 Why doesn't open() return an error when a pipe open fails?Because the pipe open takes place in two steps: first Perl callsfork() to start a new process, then this new process calls exec() torun the program you really wanted to open. The first step reportssuccess or failure to your process, so open() can only tell youwhether the fork() succeeded or not.To find out if the exec() step succeeded, you have to catch SIGCHLDand wait() to get the exit status. You should also catch SIGPIPE ifyou're writing to the child--you may not have found out the exec()failed by the time you write. This is documented in L<perlipc>.In some cases, even this won't work. If the second argument to apiped open() contains shell metacharacters, perl fork()s, then exec()sa shell to decode the metacharacters and eventually run the desiredprogram. Now when you call wait(), you only learn whether or not theI<shell> could be successfully started...it's best to avoid shellmetacharacters.On systems that follow the spawn() paradigm, open() I<might> do whatyou expect--unless perl uses a shell to start your command. In thiscase the fork()/exec() description still applies.=head2 What's wrong with using backticks in a void context?Strictly speaking, nothing. Stylistically speaking, it's not a goodway to write maintainable code because backticks have a (potentiallyhumongous) return value, and you're ignoring it. It's may also not be veryefficient, because you have to read in all the lines of output, allocatememory for them, and then throw it away. Too often people are lulledto writing: `cp file file.bak`;And now they think "Hey, I'll just always use backticks to run programs."Bad idea: backticks are for capturing a program's output; the system()function is for running programs.Consider this line: `cat /etc/termcap`;You haven't assigned the output anywhere, so it just wastes memory(for a little while). You forgot to check C<$?> to see whetherthe program even ran correctly, too. Even if you wrote print `cat /etc/termcap`;this code could and probably should be written as system("cat /etc/termcap") == 0 or die "cat program failed!";which will get the output quickly (as it is generated, instead of onlyat the end) and also check the return value.system() also provides direct control over whether shell wildcardprocessing may take place, whereas backticks do not.
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -