002_33.htm

来自「通讯类的标准。对要开发SS7的朋友有很大帮助的。(通讯协议)」· HTM 代码 · 共 254 行

HTM
254
字号
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!-- saved from url=(0059)http://www.chinagk.org/technology/IPTech/002/css/002_33.htm -->
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>002_33</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=gb2312">
<STYLE type=text/css>.pg {
	LEFT: 0px; WIDTH: 635px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 0px; HEIGHT: 983px
}
BODY {
	FONT-SIZE: 13px; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: ""; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff
}
A {
	TEXT-DECORATION: none
}
.ps0 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 53px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 102px
}
.ps1 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 204px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 130px
}
.ps2 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 27px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 178px
}
.ps3 {
	LEFT: 64px; WIDTH: 530px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 210px
}
.ps4 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 557px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 230px
}
.ps5 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 556px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 251px
}
.ps6 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 556px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 272px
}
.ps7 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 557px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 292px
}
.ps8 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 67px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 313px
}
.ps9 {
	LEFT: 64px; WIDTH: 529px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 335px
}
.ps10 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 557px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 354px
}
.ps11 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 357px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 375px
}
.ps12 {
	LEFT: 406px; WIDTH: 194px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 376px
}
.ps13 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 177px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 396px
}
.ps14 {
	LEFT: 64px; WIDTH: 529px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 416px
}
.ps15 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 556px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 437px
}
.ps16 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 563px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 458px
}
.ps17 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 175px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 478px
}
.ps18 {
	LEFT: 64px; WIDTH: 189px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 500px
}
.ps19 {
	LEFT: 57px; WIDTH: 536px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 520px
}
.ps20 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 556px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 540px
}
.ps21 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 556px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 561px
}
.ps22 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 410px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 582px
}
.ps23 {
	LEFT: 64px; WIDTH: 535px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 604px
}
.ps24 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 556px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 623px
}
.ps25 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 549px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 644px
}
.ps26 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 556px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 666px
}
.ps27 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 556px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 685px
}
.ps28 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 526px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 706px
}
.ps29 {
	LEFT: 90px; WIDTH: 477px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 733px
}
.ps30 {
	LEFT: 64px; WIDTH: 504px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 753px
}
.ps31 {
	LEFT: 64px; WIDTH: 229px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 773px
}
.ps32 {
	LEFT: 64px; WIDTH: 95px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 801px
}
.ps33 {
	LEFT: 64px; WIDTH: 196px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 822px
}
.ps34 {
	LEFT: 64px; WIDTH: 530px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 842px
}
.ps35 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 563px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 862px
}
.ps36 {
	LEFT: 37px; WIDTH: 351px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 882px
}
.ps37 {
	LEFT: 64px; WIDTH: 525px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 904px
}
.ps38 {
	LEFT: 371px; WIDTH: 150px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 54px
}
.ps39 {
	LEFT: 541px; WIDTH: 37px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 31px
}
.ps40 {
	LEFT: 44px; WIDTH: 43px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 64px
}
.ft1 {
	FONT-SIZE: 15px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif
}
.ft2 {
	FONT-FAMILY: ""
}
.ft3 {
	FONT-SIZE: 13px; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",Times,serif
}
.ft4 {
	FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-FAMILY: ""
}
.ft5 {
	FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 37px; FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",Times,serif
}
.ft6 {
	FONT-SIZE: 21px; COLOR: #000000; FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-FAMILY: ""
}
.em0 {
	FONT-SIZE: 16px; FONT-FAMILY: ""
}
.em1 {
	FONT-SIZE: 13px; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",Times,serif
}
.em2 {
	FONT-SIZE: 13px; FONT-FAMILY: ""
}
.em3 {
	FONT-SIZE: 13px; FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-FAMILY: ""
}
.em4 {
	FONT-SIZE: 13px; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",Times,serif
}
.em5 {
	FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",Times,serif
}
.im0 {
	LEFT: 33px; WIDTH: 562px; POSITION: absolute; TOP: 24px
}
</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV class=pg></DIV><!-- bitmap and vector images are written here -->
<DIV class=im0><IMG height=64 src="002_33.files/right.jpg" width=563 
border=0></DIV><!-- text starts here --><SPAN class=ps0><NOBR>考虑过。</NOBR></SPAN> 
<SPAN class=ps1><NOBR><SPAN class=ft1>2.2 &nbsp;&nbsp;RSVP<SPAN 
class=em0>—</SPAN><SPAN class=em0>资源保留协议</SPAN></SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps2><NOBR><SPAN class=ft2>背景</SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps3><NOBR>资源保留协议(<SPAN class=em1>ReSource reserVation 
Protocol</SPAN>,<SPAN class=em1>RSVP</SPAN>)在<SPAN class=em1>RFC 
2205</SPAN>中定义,另外还有几</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN class=ps4><NOBR>个<SPAN 
class=em1>RFC</SPAN>详细说明了它和链路层协议,如<SPAN class=em1>ATM</SPAN>的用法。<SPAN 
class=em1>RSVP</SPAN>是为了在两个端点间建立通道的<SPAN class=em1>IP</SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps5><NOBR>信令,其目标是在介质流上传输高<SPAN class=em1>QoS</SPAN>。<SPAN 
class=em1>RSVP</SPAN>并不保证<SPAN class=em1>QoS<SPAN 
class=em2>,</SPAN></SPAN>但它尽可能按照分类原则处理</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps6><NOBR>来自特定类别的包,以使端到端传输成为可预测的过程。该协议也适合于包含组播应用,这</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps7><NOBR>样,它必然具有内在的复杂性。它很有希望成为在新的公用网中传输基于<SPAN 
class=em1>IP</SPAN>的电话服务的<SPAN class=em1>QoS</SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps8><NOBR>信令协议。</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN class=ps9><NOBR><SPAN 
class=ft3>RSVP<SPAN class=em2>固定一条路径给两个端点间的包流使用。这时,立刻有一个明显的问题:当</SPAN>IP<SPAN 
class=em2>层路</SPAN></SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN class=ps10><NOBR>由严格依赖于目标<SPAN 
class=em1>IP</SPAN>地址时,如何迫使网络中两端点间路径选择是基于<SPAN 
class=em1>QoS</SPAN>的呢?第二个问题</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps11><NOBR>是如何处理下面这种情况:预先确定的通道不能提供要求的</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps12><NOBR><SPAN class=ft3>QoS<SPAN class=em2>,</SPAN><SPAN 
class=em2>在呼叫初始化失败之前,</SPAN></SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps13><NOBR>需要检查其他可选择的路由。</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps14><NOBR>在寻求一个协议以固定无连接服务中两个端点之间的路径时,&nbsp;<SPAN 
class=em1>IP</SPAN>界人士的心中有一个宏</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps15><NOBR>伟的目标。这听起来像是一个矛盾,但使得如果在呼叫持续期间内没有特定的传输路径,不</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps16><NOBR>管什么服务,实现任何有意义的<SPAN class=em1>QoS</SPAN>都是没有把握的。为无连接<SPAN 
class=em1>IP</SPAN>协议固定一个端到端路径,</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps17><NOBR>这一点说起来容易做起来难。</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN class=ps18><NOBR><SPAN 
class=ft3>RFC<SPAN class=em2>声明中的协议摘要中写到:</SPAN></SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps19><NOBR>“<SPAN 
class=em1>RSVP</SPAN>为组播或单播数据流提供接收者发起的资源保留初始化,它具有良好的升级性和</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps20><NOBR>健壮性。<SPAN class=em1>RSVP</SPAN>协议由主机使用,为特定应用数据流向网络请求特定的<SPAN 
class=em1>QoS</SPAN>。<SPAN class=em1>RSVP</SPAN>也可以由</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps21><NOBR>路由器使用,沿着流中的路径将<SPAN 
class=em1>QoS</SPAN>请求传送给所有节点,并建立和保持状态以提供给请求</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps22><NOBR>的服务。<SPAN 
class=em1>RSVP</SPAN>请求通常会沿着数据路径的每个节点产生资源保留。”</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps23><NOBR><SPAN class=ft3>RSVP<SPAN 
class=em2>的一个关键问题是资源保留通常并不能够得到保证。和</SPAN>SS7<SPAN class=em2>信令(将在第</SPAN>3<SPAN 
class=em2>章讨论)</SPAN></SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps24><NOBR>类似,它不能沿路径在交换机之间找到<SPAN 
class=em1>TDM</SPAN>网段。但是重要的差别在于它可以很容易发现公</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps25><NOBR>用电话网中是否存在<SPAN 
class=em1>TDM</SPAN>干线。干线以提前的方式保留,不需要在相反方向附加字符串。</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps26><NOBR><SPAN class=ft3>PSTN<SPAN class=em2>中的电路保留是一个二元选择。另一方面,<SPAN 
class=em1>VoIP</SPAN>电话技术中的资源保留很大程度上依赖</SPAN></SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps27><NOBR>于运行<SPAN 
class=em1>RSVP</SPAN>的路由产品实现的容量算法类型,以及相邻的设备是否能够提前预知<SPAN 
class=em1>RSVP</SPAN>请求</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps28><NOBR>能否成功。乍看起来,这会在服务使用频繁期间产生过多的信令,并有很大的故障可能。</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps29><NOBR><SPAN class=ft3>RSVP<SPAN class=em3>并不是路由协议。</SPAN>RSVP<SPAN 
class=em3>不是通信量管理。</SPAN>RSVP<SPAN 
class=em3>希望和现在的、将来的单</SPAN></SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN class=ps30><NOBR><SPAN 
class=ft4>播和组播路由协议共同运行。<SPAN class=em4>RSVP</SPAN>是一个传输层控制协议,类似于<SPAN 
class=em4>IGMP</SPAN>、<SPAN class=em4>ICMP</SPAN>或</SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps31><NOBR><SPAN class=ft4>者其他路由协议,但它并不传输数据。</SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps32><NOBR><SPAN class=ft3>1. <SPAN 
class=em3>协议基本原理</SPAN></SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN class=ps33><NOBR><SPAN 
class=ft3>RSVP<SPAN class=em2>协议由如下高层属性表征:</SPAN></SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps34><NOBR><SPAN class=ft3>&#8226; <SPAN 
class=em2>它是面向接收者的,也就是说,发送者提出的实际路径保留是由接收者完成的。主要原</SPAN></SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> 
<SPAN class=ps35><NOBR>因在于对组播应用的支持。这是它和<SPAN 
class=em1>SS7</SPAN>信令为建立简单电话呼叫而进行电路保留的主要差别。</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps36><NOBR>为支持组播而增加的功能在简单应用中马上就要付出代价。</NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps37><NOBR><SPAN class=ft3>&#8226; <SPAN 
class=em2>它支持为每个组播会话进行异构的保留。它允许多点会话中的接收者请求不同的</SPAN>QoS<SPAN 
class=em2>。</SPAN></SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN class=ps38><NOBR><SPAN 
class=ft4>第<SPAN class=em5>2</SPAN>章&nbsp;包网络的介质传输</SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps39><NOBR><SPAN class=ft5>89</SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> <SPAN 
class=ps40><NOBR><SPAN class=ft6>文档</SPAN></NOBR></SPAN> </BODY></HTML>

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?