colonov.txt

来自「开放源码的编译器open watcom 1.6.0版的源代码」· 文本 代码 · 共 94 行

Determining the rules for operator-overloading of colon operation
=================================================================

This is an extension. The draft does not provide built-in templates for
overloading ?: operations.

What the draft says:

    (1) the common type used in colon-conversion is either the left or
        the right type (not a combination)
        
    (2) the common type is a reference when the original types are identical
        reference types or when one of the referenced objects is derived
        from the other.
        
    (3) otherwise, the common type is an rvalue and the usual arithmetic
        or pointer conversions are applied.

Our extension is to add built-in operators

    template< class T > operator : ( T, T );
    
and to overload, for X:Y, using

    operator : ( T[X], T[X] ) where T[X] is the type of X
    operator : ( T[Y], T[Y] ) where T[Y] is the type of Y
    
to force a conversion of either X or Y to the type of the other.

        
One will get different results depending upon whether the overloading occurs
on the original expression or whether conversions to rvalues are applied
first.


Example[1]:

    struct S {
        S( int );
    };
    
    extern S sv0;
    extern bool b;
    
    S sv1 = b ? 4 : sv0;
    
    Overloading using 
        operator : ( int, int )
        operator : ( S&, S& )
        
    produces a warning since S(4) is bound to S&.
    
    Overloading, after converting to rvalues, with
        operator : ( int, int )
        operator : ( S, S )
    
    produces no errors.
    

Example[2]:

    struct S {
        operator int&();
    };     
       
    extern S sv0;
    extern bool b;
    extern int i;
    
    void foo()
    {
        ( b ? i : sv0 ) = 465;
    }
    
    Overloading using 
        operator : ( &int, &int )
        operator : ( S&, S& )
        
    produces no errors.
    
    Overloading, after converting to rvalues, with
        operator : ( int, int )
        operator : ( S, S )
    
    produces garbage.
    
    
Conclusion

    We should not have the extension.  The work-around for the above examples
    is to insert a cast to force the desired conversion.
    
    I doubt if many people rely on the feature.