📄 eilseq.m4
字号:
#serial 1AC_PREREQ(2.50)# The EILSEQ errno value ought to be defined in <errno.h>, according to# ISO C 99 and POSIX. But some systems (like SunOS 4) don't define it,# and some systems (like BSD/OS) define it in <wchar.h> not <errno.h>.# Define EILSEQ as a C macro and as a substituted macro in such a way that# 1. on all systems, after inclusion of <errno.h>, EILSEQ is usable,# 2. on systems where EILSEQ is defined elsewhere, we use the same numeric# value.AC_DEFUN([AC_EILSEQ],[ AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CC])dnl dnl Check for any extra headers that could define EILSEQ. AC_CHECK_HEADERS(wchar.h) AC_CACHE_CHECK([for EILSEQ], ac_cv_decl_EILSEQ, [ AC_EGREP_CPP(yes,[#include <errno.h>#ifdef EILSEQyes#endif ], have_eilseq=1) if test -n "$have_eilseq"; then dnl EILSEQ exists in <errno.h>. Don't need to define EILSEQ ourselves. ac_cv_decl_EILSEQ=yes else AC_EGREP_CPP(yes,[#include <errno.h>#if HAVE_WCHAR_H#include <wchar.h>#endif#ifdef EILSEQyes#endif ], have_eilseq=1) if test -n "$have_eilseq"; then dnl EILSEQ exists in some other system header. dnl Define it to the same value. _AC_COMPUTE_INT([EILSEQ], ac_cv_decl_EILSEQ, [#include <errno.h>#if HAVE_WCHAR_H#include <wchar.h>#endif/* The following two lines are a workaround against an autoconf-2.52 bug. */#include <stdio.h>#include <stdlib.h>]) else dnl EILSEQ isn't defined by the system. Define EILSEQ ourselves, but dnl don't define it as EINVAL, because iconv() callers want to dnl distinguish EINVAL and EILSEQ. ac_cv_decl_EILSEQ=ENOENT fi fi ]) if test "$ac_cv_decl_EILSEQ" != yes; then AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([EILSEQ], [$ac_cv_decl_EILSEQ], [Define as good substitute value for EILSEQ.]) EILSEQ="$ac_cv_decl_EILSEQ" AC_SUBST(EILSEQ) fi])
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -