📄 http:^^www.cs.utexas.edu^users^ml^abduction.html
字号:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Server: CERN/3.0
Date: Tuesday, 07-Jan-97 15:56:57 GMT
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Length: 11618
Last-Modified: Monday, 11-Dec-95 16:42:34 GMT
<title>Abduction</title><h1>Abduction</h1>To view a paper, click on the open book image. <br> <br><ol><! ===========================================================================><a name="lab-aaai-94.ps.Z" </a><b> <li> Inductive Learning For Abductive Diagnosis <br> </b> Cynthia A. Thompson and Raymond J. Mooney <br><cite> Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference onAI</cite>, pp. 664-669, Seattle, WA, July 1994. (AAAI-94) <p><blockquote>A new inductive learning system, LAB (Learning for ABduction), is presented which acquires abductive rules from a set of training examples. The goal is to find a small knowledge base which, when used abductively, diagnoses the training examples correctly and generalizes well to unseen examples. This contrasts with past systems that inductively learn rules that are used deductively. Each training example is associated with potentially multiple categories (disorders), instead of one as with typical learning systems. LAB uses a simple hill-climbing algorithm to efficiently build a rule base for a set-covering abductive system. LAB has been experimentally evaluated and compared to other learning systems and an expert knowledge base in the domain of diagnosing brain damage due to stroke.</blockquote><!WA0><a href="file://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/mooney/papers/lab-aaai-94.ps.Z"><!WA1><img align=top src="http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/ml/paper.xbm"></a><p><! ===========================================================================><a name="lab-masters-93.ps.Z" </a><b> <li> Inductive Learning for Abductive Diagnosis </b> <br> Cynthia Thompson <br> M.A. Thesis, Department of Computer Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 1993. <p><blockquote>A new system for learning by induction, called LAB, is presented. LAB(Learning for ABduction) learns abductive rules based on a set of trainingexamples. Our goal is to find a small knowledge base which, when usedabductively, diagnoses the training examples correctly, in addition togeneralizing well to unseen examples. This is in contrast to past systems,which inductively learn rules which are used deductively. Abduction isparticularly well suited to diagnosis, in which we are given a set of symptoms(manifestations) and we want our output to be a set of disorders which explainwhy the manifestations are present. Each training example is associated withpotentially multiple categories, instead of one, which is the case with typicallearning systems. Building the knowledge base requires a choice betweenmultiple possibilities, and the number of possibilities grows exponentiallywith the number of training examples. One method of choosing the bestknowledge base is described and implemented. The final system isexperimentally evaluated, using data from the domain of diagnosing brain damagedue to stroke. It is compared to other learning systems and a knowledge baseproduced by an expert. The results are promising: the rule base learned issimpler than the expert knowledge base and rules learned by one of the othersystems, and the accuracy of the learned rule base in predicting which areasare damaged is better than all the other systems as well as the expertknowledge base.</blockquote><!WA2><a href="file://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/mooney/papers/lab-masters-93.ps.Z"><!WA3><img align=top src="http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/ml/paper.xbm"></a><p><! ===========================================================================><a name="brace-proposal-92.ps.Z" </a><b> <li> Belief Revision in the Context of Abductive Explanation </b> <br> Siddarth Subramanian <br> Technical Report AI92-179, Artificial Intelligence Lab, <br>University of Texas at Austin, March 1991. <p><blockquote> This proposal presents an approach to explanation thatincorporates the paradigms of belief revision and abduction. Wepresent an algorithm that combines these techniques and a systemcalled BRACE that is a preliminary implementation of thisalgorithm. We show the applicability of the BRACE approach to a widerange of domains including scientific discovery, device diagnosis andplan recognition. Finally, we describe our proposals for a newimplementation, new application domains for our system and extensionsto this approach. </blockquote><!WA4><a href="file://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/mooney/papers/brace-proposal-92.ps.Z"><!WA5><img align=top src="http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/ml/paper.xbm"></a><p><! ===========================================================================><a name="accel-submitted-94.ps.Z" </a><b> <li> A First-Order Horn-Clause Abductive System and Its Use in Plan Recognition and Diagnosis </b> <br> Hwee Tou Ng and Raymond J. Mooney <br> Submitted for journal publication.<p><blockquote>A diverse set of intelligent activities, including natural languageunderstanding and diagnosis, requires the ability to constructexplanations for observed phenomena. In this paper, we viewexplanation as <em> abduction</em>, where an abductive explanation is aconsistent set of assumptions which, together with backgroundknowledge, logically entails a set of observations. We havesuccessfully built a domain-independent system, ACCEL, in whichknowledge about a variety of domains is uniformly encoded infirst-order Horn-clause axioms. A general-purpose abductionalgorithm, AAA, efficiently constructs explanations in thevarious domains by caching partial explanations to avoid redundantwork. Empirical results show that caching of partial explanations canachieve more than an order of magnitude speedup in run time. We haveapplied our abductive system to two general tasks: plan recognition intext understanding, and diagnosis of medical diseases, logic circuits,and dynamic systems. The results indicate that ACCEL is ageneral-purpose system capable of plan recognition and diagnosis, yetefficient enough to be of practical utility.</blockquote><!WA6><a href="file://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/mooney/papers/accel-submitted-94.ps.Z"><!WA7><img align=top src="http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/ml/paper.xbm"></a><p><! ===========================================================================><a name="accel-kr-92.ps.Z" </a><b> <li> Abductive Plan Recognition and Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Empirical Evaluation </b> <br> Hwee Tou Ng and Raymond J. Mooney <br> <cite> Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Principlesof Knowledge Representation and Reasoning</cite>, pp. 499-508,Cambridge, MA, October 1992.<p> <blockquote>While it has been realized for quite some time within AI that abductionis a general model of explanation for a variety of tasks, there havebeen no empirical investigations into the practical feasibility of ageneral, logic-based abductive approach to explanation. In this paperwe present extensive empirical results on applying a general abductivesystem, ACCEL, to moderately complex problems in plan recognitionand diagnosis. In plan recognition, ACCEL has been tested on 50short narrative texts, inferring characters' plans from actionsdescribed in a text. In medical diagnosis, ACCEL has diagnosed 50real-world patient cases involving brain damage due to stroke(previously addressed by set-covering methods). ACCEL also usesabduction to accomplish model-based diagnosis of logic circuits (a fulladder) and continuous dynamic systems (a temperature controller and thewater balance system of the human kidney). The results indicate thatgeneral purpose abduction is an effective and efficient mechanism forsolving problems in plan recognition and diagnosis.</blockquote><!WA8><a href="file://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/mooney/papers/accel-kr-92.ps.Z"><!WA9><img align=top src="http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/ml/paper.xbm"></a><p><! ===========================================================================><a name="misq-aaai-92.ps.Z" </a><b> <li> Automatic Abduction of Qualitative Models </b> <br> Bradley L. Richards, Ina Kraan, and Benjamin J. Kuipers <br> <cite> Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence</cite>, San Jose, CA, July 1992. <p><blockquote>We describe a method of automatically abducing qualitative models fromdescriptions of behaviors. We generate, from either quantitative orqualitative data, models in the form of qualitative differential equationssuitable for use by QSIM. Constraints are generated and filtered both bycomparison with the input behaviors and by dimensional analysis. If theuser provides complete information on the input behaviors and thedimensions of the input variables, the resulting model is unique,maximally constrainted, and guaranteed to reproduce the input behaviors.If the user provides incomplete information, our method will stillgenerate a model which reproduces the input behaviors, but the modelmay no longer be unique. Incompleteness can take several forms: missingdimensions, values of variables, or entire variables.</blockquote><!WA10><a href="file://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/mooney/papers/misq-aaai-92.ps.Z"><!WA11><img align=top src="http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/ml/paper.xbm"></a><p><! ===========================================================================><a name="accel-aaai-91.ps.Z" </a><b> <li> An Efficient First-Order Horn-Clause Abduction System Based on the ATMS </b> <br> Hwee Tou Ng and Raymond J. Mooney <br> <cite>Proceedings of the Ninth National Conference onArtificial Intelligence</cite>, pages 494-499, Anaheim, CA, July 1991. <p><blockquote>This paper presents an algorithm for first-order Horn-clause abductionthat uses an ATMS to avoid redundant computation. This algorithm iseither more efficient or more general than any other previousabduction algorithm. Since computing all minimal abductiveexplanations is intractable, we also present a heuristic version ofthe algorithm that uses beam search to compute a subset of thesimplest explanations. We present empirical results on a broad rangeof abduction problems from text understanding, plan recognition, anddevice diagnosis which demonstrate that our algorithm is at least anorder of magnitude faster than an alternative abduction algorithm thatdoes not use an ATMS.</blockquote><!WA12><a href="file://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/mooney/papers/accel-aaai-91.ps.Z"><!WA13><img align=top src="http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/ml/paper.xbm"></a><p><! ===========================================================================><a name="accel-aaai-90.ps.Z" </a><b> <li> On the Role of Coherence in Abductive Explanation </b> <br> Hwee Tou Ng and Raymond J. Mooney <br> <cite>Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence</cite>, pages 337-342, Boston, MA, 1990. <p><blockquote>Abduction is an important inference process underlying much of humanintelligent activities, including text understanding, planrecognition, disease diagnosis, and physical device diagnosis. Inthis paper, we describe some problems encountered using abduction tounderstand text, and present some solutions to overcome theseproblems. The solutions we propose center around the use of adifferent criterion, called <em> explanatory coherence</em>, as theprimary measure to evaluate the quality of an explanation. Inaddition, explanatory coherence plays an important role in theconstruction of explanations, both in determining the appropriatelevel of specificity of a preferred explanation, and in guiding theheuristic search to efficiently compute explanations of sufficientlyhigh quality.</blockquote><!WA14><a href="file://ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/mooney/papers/accel-aaai-90.ps.Z"><!WA15><img align=top src="http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/ml/paper.xbm"></a><p><! ===========================================================================><hr><address><!WA16><a href="http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/estlin/">estlin@cs.utexas.edu</a></address>
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -