http:^^www.cs.washington.edu^education^courses^457^projects^grading^
来自「This data set contains WWW-pages collect」· EDU^EDUCATION^COURSES^457^PROJECTS^GRADING^ 代码 · 共 106 行
EDU^EDUCATION^COURSES^457^PROJECTS^GRADING^
106 行
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 1996 16:10:11 GMTServer: NCSA/1.4.2Content-type: text/html<html><title>CSE 457</title><img src = "../../images/cse457.gif" align = left alt="CSE 457"><br><hr noshade><center><img src = "../../images/title.gif" alt="Introduction to Computer Graphics"><hr noshade><font size=-2><b>1996 Autumn Quarter</b></font></center><br clear=left><blockquote><h2>Project Grading</h2>Projects are graded during 30 minute in-person gradingsessions. A sign up sheet will be posted in Sieg 228just prior to the due date for the assignment.<p>Grading sessions will consist of:<ul><li> Each team member giving a demonstration of different portions of the program, showing that it satisfies the required part of the assignment and implements an appropriate number of bells and whistles. This is also the time to show off any great extensions or enhancements.<li> Question and answers: The TA will ask a variety of questions. Some questions will be open for response from any team member, but others will be directed at individuals. Each team member is expected to have a thorough understanding of all required extentions of the project, and any bells and whistles s/he may have done. Here is a sample of the kind of questions that might be asked: <ul> <li> Why did you choose to implement feature X using technique Y rather than technique Z? <li> Describe the steps that you'd have to carry out to implement new feature X. What new data structures would you need? What modules would you have to modify? <li> Please make the following small change to the program, then recompile and run it. </ul></ul><p> The project implementations will be graded on a 10-point scale.Unlimited extra credit is possible on each project; however, eachadditional point of extra credit is twice as difficult to achieve asthe previous point.<p> Each extra credit item is rated with a nominal value of "bells"and "whistles". One bell carries the same credit as two whistles. Anactual implementation of an extra credit item may be worth somewhatmore or less than its nominal value, depending on how well it wasimplemented.<p> In general, every team member will receive the same projectimplementation grade (although not necessarily the same projectknowledge grade). However, we reserve the right to give differentproject implementation grades to different students on the team, forextreme circumstances in which it is clear that one or more members ofthe team contributed little or nothing to the project.<p> Project knowledge will be graded on a 3-point scale, separatelyfor each team member. Here's a rough breakdown to give you a feelingfor how points will be assigned:<dl><dt>1 pt:<dd> Almost clueless: Answers to questions showed a severe lack of understanding. (I don't expect anybody to get this grade!)<dt>2 pts:<dd> Answers to questions showed an understanding at only a superficial level. <dt> 3 pts:<dd> Answers to questions demonstrated a thorough understanding of the project. This is is the grade we expect to give almost all of the time.</dl><p> The project write-up should be a 1- to 2-page document describingthe main design choices and overall implementation of the project.Here's a <a href = "../writeup/index.html">sample write-up</a>.</blockquote></html>⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?