antspace34.nlogo

本程序用国外流行的NetLogo开发

45
150
10.0
1
10
1
1
1

CC-WINDOW
5
486
348
609
Command Center

BUTTON
8
47
63
80
Go
Go
T
1
T
OBSERVER

BUTTON
8
10
63
43
Setup
Setup
NIL
1
T
OBSERVER

SLIDER
208
137
343
170
%foodDensity
%foodDensity
0
100
100
1
1
NIL

MONITOR
372
343
450
392
Food
amtFood
1
1

SLIDER
9
219
156
252
amtPheroLay-Return
amtPheroLay-Return
0
30
30
1
1
NIL

SLIDER
208
220
344
253
evaporation-rate
evaporation-rate
0
0.5
0.075
0.0050
1
NIL

SLIDER
8
102
182
135
maxPheroPerSite-Forage
maxPheroPerSite-Forage
0
1000
1000
5
1
NIL

SLIDER
9
136
182
169
maxPheroPerSite-Return
maxPheroPerSite-Return
0
800
300
5
1
NIL

MONITOR
378
90
436
139
NIL
Clock
1
1

SLIDER
221
43
313
76
nestY
nestY
-100
100
100
1
1
NIL

MONITOR
378
188
436
237
# dead
numDead
0
1

SLIDER
12
303
104
336
k
k
0.5
100
100.0
0.5
1
NIL

MONITOR
366
240
449
289
%FoodFound
(colonyFood / amtFood) * 100
2
1

SLIDER
207
102
342
135
foodConcentration
foodConcentration
1
400
400
1
1
NIL

MONITOR
380
397
458
446
NIL
colonyFood
0
1

SLIDER
71
10
179
43
antsNumber
antsNumber
0
100
46
1
1
NIL

SLIDER
208
184
344
217
numAntsPerPatch
numAntsPerPatch
0
100
1
1
1
NIL

PLOT
741
10
991
208
% area covered
 
 
0.0
350.0
0.0
20.0
true
false

MONITOR
742
405
836
454
% area covered
(pheromone-amt / screenArea) * 100
2
1

MONITOR
917
406
996
455
MaxDist
max-distance
0
1

PLOT
741
215
991
399
Foraging-Width
 
 
0.0
863.0
0.0
64.0
true
false

MONITOR
743
458
840
507
NIL
Foraging-Width
0
1

SLIDER
11
268
103
301
n
n
0
100
100
1
1
NIL

SLIDER
221
10
313
43
nestX
nestX
-30
30
-30
1
1
NIL

SLIDER
9
184
156
217
amtPheroLay-Forage
amtPheroLay-Forage
0
30
30
1
1
NIL

BUTTON
13
354
105
387
NIL
showFood
NIL
1
T
OBSERVER

BUTTON
220
356
283
389
NIL
clear
NIL
1
T
OBSERVER

BUTTON
114
355
210
388
NIL
showPhero
NIL
1
T
OBSERVER

@#$#@#$#@
Model instructions/description:

This model reproduces the models of army ant foraging developed by 
Deneubourg et al. (1989. The blind leading the blind: modeling 
chemically mediated army ant raid patterns. J. Insect Behav., 2, 719-725) 
and the extension of this model analyzed by Sole et al in 2000 
(Pattern formation and optimization in army ant raids. Artificial Life, 6(3), 219-226).  

The main structural differences between the Deneubourg et al model 
and the Sole et al model was that in the initial model, the world 
was diamond shaped, that is, at any given point an ant could go 
either to the 揘ortheast