📄 analyze.c
字号:
/* Analyze file differences for GNU DIFF. Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993 Free Software Foundation, Inc.This file is part of GNU DIFF.GNU DIFF is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modifyit under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published bythe Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)any later version.GNU DIFF is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty ofMERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See theGNU General Public License for more details.You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public Licensealong with GNU DIFF; see the file COPYING. If not, write tothe Free Software Foundation, 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. *//* The basic algorithm is described in: "An O(ND) Difference Algorithm and its Variations", Eugene Myers, Algorithmica Vol. 1 No. 2, 1986, pp. 251-266; see especially section 4.2, which describes the variation used below. Unless the --minimal option is specified, this code uses the TOO_EXPENSIVE heuristic, by Paul Eggert, to limit the cost to O(N**1.5 log N) at the price of producing suboptimal output for large inputs with many differences. The basic algorithm was independently discovered as described in: "Algorithms for Approximate String Matching", E. Ukkonen, Information and Control Vol. 64, 1985, pp. 100-118. */#include "diff.h"#include "cmpbuf.h"extern int no_discards;static int *xvec, *yvec; /* Vectors being compared. */static int *fdiag; /* Vector, indexed by diagonal, containing 1 + the X coordinate of the point furthest along the given diagonal in the forward search of the edit matrix. */static int *bdiag; /* Vector, indexed by diagonal, containing the X coordinate of the point furthest along the given diagonal in the backward search of the edit matrix. */static int too_expensive; /* Edit scripts longer than this are too expensive to compute. */#define SNAKE_LIMIT 20 /* Snakes bigger than this are considered `big'. */struct partition{ int xmid, ymid; /* Midpoints of this partition. */ int lo_minimal; /* Nonzero if low half will be analyzed minimally. */ int hi_minimal; /* Likewise for high half. */};static int diag PARAMS((int, int, int, int, int, struct partition *));static struct change *add_change PARAMS((int, int, int, int, struct change *));static struct change *build_reverse_script PARAMS((struct file_data const[]));static struct change *build_script PARAMS((struct file_data const[]));static void briefly_report PARAMS((int, struct file_data const[]));static void compareseq PARAMS((int, int, int, int, int));static void discard_confusing_lines PARAMS((struct file_data[]));static void shift_boundaries PARAMS((struct file_data[]));/* Find the midpoint of the shortest edit script for a specified portion of the two files. Scan from the beginnings of the files, and simultaneously from the ends, doing a breadth-first search through the space of edit-sequence. When the two searches meet, we have found the midpoint of the shortest edit sequence. If MINIMAL is nonzero, find the minimal edit script regardless of expense. Otherwise, if the search is too expensive, use heuristics to stop the search and report a suboptimal answer. Set PART->(XMID,YMID) to the midpoint (XMID,YMID). The diagonal number XMID - YMID equals the number of inserted lines minus the number of deleted lines (counting only lines before the midpoint). Return the approximate edit cost; this is the total number of lines inserted or deleted (counting only lines before the midpoint), unless a heuristic is used to terminate the search prematurely. Set PART->LEFT_MINIMAL to nonzero iff the minimal edit script for the left half of the partition is known; similarly for PART->RIGHT_MINIMAL. This function assumes that the first lines of the specified portions of the two files do not match, and likewise that the last lines do not match. The caller must trim matching lines from the beginning and end of the portions it is going to specify. If we return the "wrong" partitions, the worst this can do is cause suboptimal diff output. It cannot cause incorrect diff output. */static intdiag (xoff, xlim, yoff, ylim, minimal, part) int xoff, xlim, yoff, ylim, minimal; struct partition *part;{ int *const fd = fdiag; /* Give the compiler a chance. */ int *const bd = bdiag; /* Additional help for the compiler. */ int const *const xv = xvec; /* Still more help for the compiler. */ int const *const yv = yvec; /* And more and more . . . */ int const dmin = xoff - ylim; /* Minimum valid diagonal. */ int const dmax = xlim - yoff; /* Maximum valid diagonal. */ int const fmid = xoff - yoff; /* Center diagonal of top-down search. */ int const bmid = xlim - ylim; /* Center diagonal of bottom-up search. */ int fmin = fmid, fmax = fmid; /* Limits of top-down search. */ int bmin = bmid, bmax = bmid; /* Limits of bottom-up search. */ int c; /* Cost. */ int odd = (fmid - bmid) & 1; /* True if southeast corner is on an odd diagonal with respect to the northwest. */ fd[fmid] = xoff; bd[bmid] = xlim; for (c = 1;; ++c) { int d; /* Active diagonal. */ int big_snake = 0; /* Extend the top-down search by an edit step in each diagonal. */ fmin > dmin ? fd[--fmin - 1] = -1 : ++fmin; fmax < dmax ? fd[++fmax + 1] = -1 : --fmax; for (d = fmax; d >= fmin; d -= 2) { int x, y, oldx, tlo = fd[d - 1], thi = fd[d + 1]; if (tlo >= thi) x = tlo + 1; else x = thi; oldx = x; y = x - d; while (x < xlim && y < ylim && xv[x] == yv[y]) ++x, ++y; if (x - oldx > SNAKE_LIMIT) big_snake = 1; fd[d] = x; if (odd && bmin <= d && d <= bmax && bd[d] <= x) { part->xmid = x; part->ymid = y; part->lo_minimal = part->hi_minimal = 1; return 2 * c - 1; } } /* Similarly extend the bottom-up search. */ bmin > dmin ? bd[--bmin - 1] = INT_MAX : ++bmin; bmax < dmax ? bd[++bmax + 1] = INT_MAX : --bmax; for (d = bmax; d >= bmin; d -= 2) { int x, y, oldx, tlo = bd[d - 1], thi = bd[d + 1]; if (tlo < thi) x = tlo; else x = thi - 1; oldx = x; y = x - d; while (x > xoff && y > yoff && xv[x - 1] == yv[y - 1]) --x, --y; if (oldx - x > SNAKE_LIMIT) big_snake = 1; bd[d] = x; if (!odd && fmin <= d && d <= fmax && x <= fd[d]) { part->xmid = x; part->ymid = y; part->lo_minimal = part->hi_minimal = 1; return 2 * c; } } if (minimal) continue; /* Heuristic: check occasionally for a diagonal that has made lots of progress compared with the edit distance. If we have any such, find the one that has made the most progress and return it as if it had succeeded. With this heuristic, for files with a constant small density of changes, the algorithm is linear in the file size. */ if (c > 200 && big_snake && heuristic) { int best; best = 0; for (d = fmax; d >= fmin; d -= 2) { int dd = d - fmid; int x = fd[d]; int y = x - d; int v = (x - xoff) * 2 - dd; if (v > 12 * (c + (dd < 0 ? -dd : dd))) { if (v > best && xoff + SNAKE_LIMIT <= x && x < xlim && yoff + SNAKE_LIMIT <= y && y < ylim) { /* We have a good enough best diagonal; now insist that it end with a significant snake. */ int k; for (k = 1; xv[x - k] == yv[y - k]; k++) if (k == SNAKE_LIMIT) { best = v; part->xmid = x; part->ymid = y; break; } } } } if (best > 0) { part->lo_minimal = 1; part->hi_minimal = 0; return 2 * c - 1; } best = 0; for (d = bmax; d >= bmin; d -= 2) { int dd = d - bmid; int x = bd[d]; int y = x - d; int v = (xlim - x) * 2 + dd; if (v > 12 * (c + (dd < 0 ? -dd : dd))) { if (v > best && xoff < x && x <= xlim - SNAKE_LIMIT && yoff < y && y <= ylim - SNAKE_LIMIT) { /* We have a good enough best diagonal; now insist that it end with a significant snake. */ int k; for (k = 0; xv[x + k] == yv[y + k]; k++) if (k == SNAKE_LIMIT - 1) { best = v; part->xmid = x; part->ymid = y; break; } } } } if (best > 0) { part->lo_minimal = 0; part->hi_minimal = 1; return 2 * c - 1; } } /* Heuristic: if we've gone well beyond the call of duty, give up and report halfway between our best results so far. */ if (c >= too_expensive) { int fxybest, fxbest; int bxybest, bxbest; fxbest = bxbest = 0; /* Pacify `gcc -Wall'. */ /* Find forward diagonal that maximizes X + Y. */ fxybest = -1; for (d = fmax; d >= fmin; d -= 2) { int x = min (fd[d], xlim); int y = x - d; if (ylim < y) x = ylim + d, y = ylim; if (fxybest < x + y) { fxybest = x + y; fxbest = x; } } /* Find backward diagonal that minimizes X + Y. */ bxybest = INT_MAX; for (d = bmax; d >= bmin; d -= 2) { int x = max (xoff, bd[d]); int y = x - d; if (y < yoff) x = yoff + d, y = yoff; if (x + y < bxybest) { bxybest = x + y; bxbest = x; } } /* Use the better of the two diagonals. */ if ((xlim + ylim) - bxybest < fxybest - (xoff + yoff)) { part->xmid = fxbest; part->ymid = fxybest - fxbest; part->lo_minimal = 1; part->hi_minimal = 0; } else { part->xmid = bxbest; part->ymid = bxybest - bxbest; part->lo_minimal = 0; part->hi_minimal = 1; } return 2 * c - 1; } }}/* Compare in detail contiguous subsequences of the two files which are known, as a whole, to match each other. The results are recorded in the vectors files[N].changed_flag, by storing a 1 in the element for each line that is an insertion or deletion. The subsequence of file 0 is [XOFF, XLIM) and likewise for file 1. Note that XLIM, YLIM are exclusive bounds. All line numbers are origin-0 and discarded lines are not counted. If MINIMAL is nonzero, find a minimal difference no matter how expensive it is. */static voidcompareseq (xoff, xlim, yoff, ylim, minimal) int xoff, xlim, yoff, ylim, minimal;{ int * const xv = xvec; /* Help the compiler. */ int * const yv = yvec; /* Slide down the bottom initial diagonal. */ while (xoff < xlim && yoff < ylim && xv[xoff] == yv[yoff]) ++xoff, ++yoff; /* Slide up the top initial diagonal. */ while (xlim > xoff && ylim > yoff && xv[xlim - 1] == yv[ylim - 1]) --xlim, --ylim; /* Handle simple cases. */ if (xoff == xlim) while (yoff < ylim) files[1].changed_flag[files[1].realindexes[yoff++]] = 1; else if (yoff == ylim) while (xoff < xlim) files[0].changed_flag[files[0].realindexes[xoff++]] = 1; else { int c;
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -